/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 In your own words, describe Hami... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In your own words, describe Hamilton's method of apportionment.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Hamilton's method of apportionment is a way to divide a finite number of items (e.g., House seats) proportionally based on weights or population size. Each state (or party, group, etc.) is first assigned a quantity equal to the whole number part of its quota (population divided by a standard divisor). Any remaining items are distributed individually to those states with the largest fractional part left in their quota. This continues until all items are distributed. Ties are broken by first favoring states with a smaller whole quota part, and then to those earlier in a predetermined order.

Step by step solution

01

Basic Idea

Hamilton's method of apportionment is based on the idea of distributing seats proportionally according to the population. Each state is first assigned a number of seats equal to the whole number part of the standard divisor quotient. A 'standard divisor' is calculated by dividing the total population by the fixed number of seats.
02

Calculation of Standard Quotas

Based on the standard divisor, each state's 'standard quota' is calculated simply by dividing the state's population by the standard divisor. The standard quota consists of a whole number part, and a decimal part.
03

Assigning Initial Seats

Each state is initially assigned seats equal to the whole number part of its standard quota. This ensures that the state gets the number of seats proportional to its whole part of the population.
04

Distributing Remaining Seats

After the seats have been distributed according to the standard quotas, if there are any seats left, they are distributed one by one, according to the size of the fractional parts of the quotas, starting with the state with the largest fractional part. This is continued until all the seats are distributed.
05

Handling Ties

If a tie occurs in the process of distributing the remaining seats, whereby the fractional parts of states are equal, the seat is allocated to the state with the smaller whole number part of the quota. If those are also equal, the seat is given to the state that comes first in some predetermined order.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standard Divisor
When using Hamilton's method of apportionment, the first step is to calculate the standard divisor. This is a key concept for understanding how seats are allocated proportionally. The standard divisor is determined by dividing the total population by the number of seats available.
This divisor acts as a baseline number to figure out how many people should ideally be represented by one seat. For example:
  • If the total population is 1,000,000 and there are 100 seats, the standard divisor is 10,000. This means one seat is ideally meant to represent 10,000 people.
Understanding the standard divisor is crucial because it sets up the framework for calculating each state's standard quota and determining how seats are initially distributed based on population. This ensures that the larger the population, the more seats are proportionally allocated.
Standard Quota
The concept of the standard quota comes into play after determining the standard divisor. Each state's standard quota is calculated by dividing the state's population by the standard divisor.
This quota tells you how many seats a state should receive if we could allocate fractional seats. It includes a whole number part and a decimal part. For instance:
  • If a state has a population of 50,000 and the standard divisor is 10,000, then the standard quota is 5.0, meaning the state directly earns 5 seats.
  • Another state with a population of 75,000 would have a standard quota of 7.5. This shows that beyond receiving 7 seats, it has a fractional part of 0.5 that will need special handling.
This step ensures an accurate representation of a state's proportional need for seats before moving to finer adjustments based on decimal places.
Proportional Distribution
Proportional distribution is the process of initially allocating seats based on the whole number part of each state's standard quota. This step ensures that each state gets seats proportional to its population size.
To clarify:
  • Each state first receives seats equal to the whole number in its standard quota. So, a state with a quota of 7.5 would originally be assigned 7 seats.
  • Another state with a quota of 6.25 would receive 6 seats at this stage.
This method helps prevent disparities by ensuring major portions of populations are equally represented before moving on to specific details. It is a fundamental part of creating an initial balance before fractional parts are addressed.
Whole Number Parts
The whole number parts of the standard quota form a crucial basis for the first allocation of seats in Hamilton's method. Once the standard quotas are calculated, each state receives an allocation based on the integer part of their standard quota.
This ensures proportionality to the larger segments of the population. However, it does leave room for adjustment since fractional parts do exist:
  • A state's whole number part is what secures it a minimum number of seats before any further distribution of remaining seats by fractional parts.
  • These whole number parts collectively reflect the largest assured distribution of seats.
It's important to separate whole number allocation from fractional parts management as it simplifies the complex process of fair distribution and gives an initial framework for fairness.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe the head-to-head criterion.

The programmers at the Theater Channel need to select a live musical to introduce their new network. The five choices are Cabaret \((C)\), The Producers \((P)\), Rent \((R)\), Sweeney Todd (S), or West Side Story \((W)\). The 22 programmers rank their choices, summarized in the following preference table. Use the table to solve.$ $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Number of Votes } & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{5} & \mathbf{4} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{2} \\ \hline \text { First Choice } & \text { C } & \text { S } & \text { C } & \text { W } & \text { W } & \text { P } \\ \hline \text { Second Choice } & \text { R } & \text { R } & \text { P } & \text { P } & \text { R } & \text { S } \\ \hline \text { Third Choice } & \text { P } & \text { W } & \text { R } & \text { R } & \text { S } & \text { C } \\ \hline \text { Fourth Choice } & \text { W } & \text { P } & \text { S } & \text { S } & \text { C } & \text { R } \\ \hline \text { Fifth Choice } & \text { S } & \text { C } & \text { W } & \text { C } & \text { P } & \text { W } \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Determine which musical is selected using the pairwise comparison method.

Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. A candidate has a majority of the vote, yet lost the election using the plurality-with-elimination method.

Citizen-initiated ballot measures often present voters with controversial issues over which they do not think alike. Here's one your author would like to initiate: Please rank each of the following options regarding permitting dogs on national park trails. i. Unleashed dogs accompanied by their caregivers should be permitted on designated national park trails. ii. Leashed dogs accompanied by their caregivers should be permitted on designated national park trails. iii. No dogs should be permitted on any national park trails. Your author was not happy with the fact that he could not take his dog running with him on the park trails at Point Reyes National Seashore. Of course, that is his issue. For this project, group members should write a ballot measure, perhaps controversial, like the sample above, but dealing with an issue of relevance to your campus and community. Rather than holding an election, use a random sample of students on your campus, administer the ballot, and have them rank their choices. a. Use each of the four voting methods to determine the winning option for your ballot measure. b. Check to see if any of the four fairness criteria are violated.

Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. A candidate won an election and, in a reelection, the only changes were changes that favored the candidate, so I'm certain that this candidate won the reelection.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.