/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 48 A University of Helsinki (Finlan... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A University of Helsinki (Finland) study wanted to determine if chocolate consumption during pregnancy had an effect on infant temperament at age 6months. Researchers began by asking 305healthy pregnant women to report their chocolate consumption. Six months after birth, the researchers asked mothers to rate their infants鈥 temperament using the traits of smiling, laughter, and fear. The babies born to women who had been eating chocolate daily during pregnancy were found to be more active and 鈥減ositively reactive鈥濃攁 measure that the investigators said encompasses traits like smiling and laughter.

a. What are the explanatory and response variables?

b. Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer.

c. Does this study show that eating chocolate regularly during pregnancy helps produce infants with good temperament? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part a. The chocolate consumption of the mother is the explanatory variable whereas the infants鈥 temperament is the response variable.

Part b. The study is an observational study.

Part c. No.

Step by step solution

01

Part a. Step 1. Explanation

The researchers want to determine if chocolate consumption during pregnancy had an effect on the infant temperament at an age of six months or not. Thus, the chocolate consumption is the independent variable whereas the temperament of the infants is the dependent variable as it depends on the chocolate consumption by their mothers during pregnancy. Therefore, the chocolate consumption of the mother is the explanatory variable whereas the infants鈥 temperament is the response variable.

02

Part b. Step 1. Explanation

In the given study, the researchers did not try to influence the mothers nor the infants. Moreover, the mount of chocolate consumption was decided by the mother鈥檚 itself and thus the researchers did not have control over the mother鈥檚 decisions.

The researchers thus did not assign treatments to the mothers for the study and therefore, this study is an observational study.

03

Part c. Step 1. Explanation

In part (b) we found out that the study was an observational study.

It is then not possible to find out if the chocolate consumption is the cause of infants鈥 temperament because the result could be affected by a lurking variable. A possible lurking variable is the mothers鈥 temperament as children tends to have the same temperament as their parents while the mothers鈥 temperament also influence how much chocolate they eat.

If we have to find out the accurate result then the experiment is better because the lurking variable does not influence it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Corn variety 1yielded 140bushels per acre last year at a research farm. This year, corn

variety 2, planted in the same location, yielded only 110bushels per acre. Based on these

results, is it reasonable to conclude that corn variety 1is more productive than corn variety

2?

a. Yes, because 140bushels per acre is greater than 110bushels per acre.

b. Yes, because the study was done at a research farm.

c. No, because there may be other differences between the two years besides the corn

variety.

d. No, because there was no use of a placebo in the experiment.

e. No, because the experiment wasn鈥檛 double-blind.

Wording bias Comment on each of the following as a potential sample survey question.

Is the question clear? Is it slanted toward a desired response?

a. 鈥淪ome cell phone users have developed brain cancer. Should all cell phones come with

a warning label explaining the danger of using cell phones?鈥

b. 鈥淒o you agree that a national system of health insurance should be favored because it

would provide health insurance for everyone and would reduce administrative costs?鈥

c. 鈥淚n view of escalating environmental degradation and incipient resource depletion,

would you favor economic incentives for recycling of resource鈥搃ntensive consumer

驳辞辞诲蝉?鈥

A popular website places opinion poll questions next to many of its news stories. Simply

click your response to join the sample. One of the questions was 鈥淒o you plan to diet this

year?鈥 More than 30,000 people responded, with 68% saying 鈥淵es.鈥 Which of the

following is true?

a. About 68% of Americans planned to diet.

b. The poll used a convenience sample, so the results tell us little about the population of

all adults.

c. The poll uses voluntary response, so the results tell us little about the population of all

adults.

d. The sample is too small to draw any conclusion.

e. None of these.

Sampling the forestTo gather data on a 1200-acre pine forest in Louisiana, the U.S. Forest Service laid a grid of 1410equally spaced circular plots over a map of the forest. A ground survey visited a sample of 10%of the plots.

a. Explain how you would use a random number generator to choose an SRS of 141plots. Your description should be clear enough for a classmate to carry out your plan.

b. Use your method from part (a) to choose the first 3plots.

Weekend birthdays Over the years, the percentage of births that are planned cesarean

sections has been rising. Because doctors can schedule these deliveries, there might be

more children born during the week and fewer born on the weekend than if births were

uniformly distributed throughout the week. To investigate, Mrs. McDonald and her class

selected an SRS of 73people born since1993 . Of these people, 24were born on Friday,

Saturday, or Sunday. To determine if these data provide convincing evidence that fewer than43%37 of people born since 1993were born on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, 100simulated SRSs were selected. Each dot in the graph shows the number of people that were born on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday in a simulated SRS of 73people, assuming that each person

had a 43%chance of being born on one of these three days.

a. Explain how the graph illustrates the concept of sampling variability.

b. Based on the data from the study and the results of the simulation, is there convincing

evidence that fewer than 43%of people born since 1993were born on Friday, Saturday,

or Sunday? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.