/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 110-exercise Who reviews? Government regulati... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: 110-exercise (page 283)

Who reviews? Government regulations require that institutional review boards consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider.

a. Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists?

b. Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A religious leader? An activist for patients鈥� rights?)

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Review boards should contain people who are not scientists because they need to make sure they are representing individual participants and protecting them from harm.

b. No, I do not think that one outside member is enough.

Step by step solution

01

Step: 1Given:Who reviews? Government regulations require that institutional review boards consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider.

I have to give an explanation for the above two statements.

02

Step 2:part a.A situation is given.a. Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists?

Reason part a.

Review boards should contain people who are not scientists because they need to make sure they are representing individual participants and protecting them from harm. We want to make sure normal, everyday people are on the board who are not interested in studies or future studies.

03

Step 3. b.A situation is given. b. Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A religious leader? an activist for patients’ rights)

No, I do not think that one outside member is enough. We need to leave room for a variety of reasons, viewpoints, and perspectives from people inside and outside the scientific community.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Foster care versus orphanages Do abandoned children placed in foster homes do better than similar children placed in an institution? The Bucharest Early Intervention Project found statistically significant evidence that they do. The subjects were 136young children abandoned at birth and living in orphanages in Bucharest, Romania. Half of the children, chosen at random, were placed in foster homes. The other half remained in the orphanages. (Foster care was not easily available in Romania at the time and so was paid for by the study.) What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain your reasoning.

Running red lights An SRS of 880 drivers was asked: 鈥淩ecalling the last

ten traffic lights you drove through, how many of them were red when you entered the

intersections?鈥� Of the 880 respondents, 171 admitted that at least one light had been red.

A practical problem with this survey is that people may not give truthful answers. Explain

the likely direction of the bias.

Miami's car colorsUsing a webcam, a traffic analyst selected a random sample of 800cars traveling on I-195in Miami on a weekday morning. Among the 800cars in the sample, 24%were white. The margin of error for this estimate is 3.0percentage points.

a. Would you be surprised if a census revealed that 26%of cars onI-195 in Miami on a weekday morning were white? Explain your answer.

b. Explain how the traffic analyst could decrease the margin of error.

A popular website places opinion poll questions next to many of its news stories. Simply

click your response to join the sample. One of the questions was 鈥淒o you plan to diet this

year?鈥� More than 30,000 people responded, with 68% saying 鈥淵es.鈥� Which of the

following is true?

a. About 68% of Americans planned to diet.

b. The poll used a convenience sample, so the results tell us little about the population of

all adults.

c. The poll uses voluntary response, so the results tell us little about the population of all

adults.

d. The sample is too small to draw any conclusion.

e. None of these.

Weight? Wait what? Marcos asked a random sample of 50mall shoppers for their weight. Twenty-five of the shoppers were asked directly and the other 25 were asked anonymously by means of a 鈥渟ecret ballot.鈥� The mean reported weight was13 pounds heavier for the anonymous group. Explain why the two means are so different.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.