/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 Identify the experimental units,... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Identify the experimental units, the explanatory and response variables, and the treatments. Most American adolescents don't cat well and don't exercise enough. Can middle schools increase physical activity among their students? Can they persuade students to eat better? Investigators designed a "physical activity intervention" to increase activity in physical education classes and during leisure periods throughout the school day. They also designed a "nutrition intervention" that improved school lunches and offered ideas for healthy home- packed lunches. Each participating school was randomly assigned to one of the interventions, both interventions, or no intervention. The investigators observed physical activity and lunchtime consumption of fat.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Schools; interventions; physical activity and fat consumption; four combinations of interventions.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Experimental Units

In any experiment, the experimental units are the individuals or entities to which specific treatments are applied. In this study, the experimental units are the schools that participated, as each school was assigned a set of interventions (or none).
02

Determine the Explanatory Variables

Explanatory variables, also known as independent variables, are those that the researchers manipulate to observe an effect on the response variable. In this investigation, the explanatory variables are the type of interventions applied: the 'physical activity intervention', the 'nutrition intervention', or both/no interventions.
03

Identify the Response Variables

Response variables, or dependent variables, are the outcomes measured by the researchers to determine the effect of the explanatory variables. For this study, the response variables are 'physical activity levels' and 'lunchtime consumption of fat.'
04

Determine the Treatments

Treatments are the combinations of explanatory variables applied to the experimental units. Here, the treatments are: 1) 'physical activity intervention only', 2) 'nutrition intervention only', 3) 'both physical activity and nutrition interventions', and 4) 'no intervention.'

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Experimental Units
In the realm of experimental design, the term "experimental units" refers to the entities or subjects to which treatments are applied. Think of experimental units as the foundational elements of any study, as they are the recipients of different experimental conditions or treatments. In our given study of middle school interventions, the experimental units are the schools themselves. Each participating school receives a specific set of interventions, or in some cases, no intervention at all.

These schools are the focus because researchers want to observe how differing levels of intervention impact the exercise and eating habits of their students. By clearly identifying the experimental units, investigators ensure that their findings are valid and applicable to the population studied. Clear identification also helps in the replication of the study for future research.
Explanatory Variables
Explanatory variables are key in understanding what factors might cause changes in an experiment. They are sometimes referred to as independent variables because they are the ones being manipulated by the researchers to observe how they affect the outcome or response variable. In the context of this study on middle schools, the explanatory variables are the types of interventions implemented.

These interventions include:
  • Physical activity intervention, aimed at increasing physical activity during school hours.
  • Nutrition intervention, designed to improve the nutritional quality of school lunches and provide healthy lunch packing ideas.
  • A combination of both interventions to see if their joint effect produces a more significant change.
  • No intervention, serving as a control to compare the other interventions against.
Understanding explanatory variables is crucial for analyzing how different scenarios can impact the study's outcomes.
Response Variables
Response variables, also known as dependent variables, are the key outcomes or effects that researchers measure in an experiment to determine whether or not the explanatory variables have had an impact. In this particular study, the response variables are the changes in students' physical activity levels and their lunchtime consumption of fat.

These variables are critical as they provide the evidence needed to conclude about the effectiveness of the interventions. If the interventions are successful, we might expect to see increased physical activity levels and reduced fat consumption during lunch periods.

Tracking and accurately measuring these response variables helps researchers evaluate the success of different interventions, thus providing insights that can influence future educational policies and programs.
Educational Interventions
Educational interventions in this context pertain to purposeful actions aimed at altering health-related behaviors among students, particularly related to physical activity and nutrition. These interventions are designed based on prior research and health guidelines, to promote healthier lifestyles among adolescent students.

In the experiment, two primary interventions were studied: the "physical activity intervention" and the "nutrition intervention." Each one is specifically tailored; the physical activity intervention focuses on increasing exercise through enhanced PE sessions and more active school days, while the nutrition intervention encourages healthier eating habits through improved school lunch offerings and suggestions for healthier packed lunches.

Educational interventions like these are vital as they not only target immediate health changes but also aim to instill lifelong healthy habits. By methodically implementing such interventions, educators and researchers hope to achieve significant, positive changes in student health outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the \(1960 \mathrm{~s}\) children entering the Willowbrook State School, an institution for the intellectually disabled on Staten Island in New York, were deliberately infected with hepatitis. The researchers argued that almost all children in the institution quickly became infected anyway. The studies showed for the first time that two strains of hepatitis existed. This finding contributed to the development of effective vaccines. Despite these valuable results, the Willowbrook studies are now considered an example of unethical research. Explain why, according to current ethical standards, useful results are not enough to allow a study.

A simple random sample of 1200 adult Americans is selected, and each person is asked the following question: "In light of the huge national deficit, should the government at this time spend additional money to establish a national system of health insurance?" Only \(39 \%\) of those responding answered "Yes." This survey (a) is reasonably accurate since it used a large simple random sample. (b) needs to be larger since only about 24 people were drawn from cach state. (c) probably understates the percent of people who favor a system of national health insurance. (d) is very inaccurate but neither understates nor overstates the percent of people who favor a system of national health insurance. Because simple random sampling was used, it is unbiased. (e) probably overstates the percent of people who favor a system of national health insurance.

To gather information about the validity of a new standardized test for tenth- grade students in a particular state, a random sample of 15 high schools was selected from the state. The new test was administered to every 10 th-grade student in the selected high schools. What kind of sample is this? (a) A simple random sample (b) \(A\) stratified random sample (c) A cluster sanple (d) \(A\) systematic random sample (e) A voluntary response sample

According to Louann Brizendine, author of The Female Brain, women say nearly three times as many words per day as men. Skeptical researchers devised a study to test this claim. They used electronic devices to record the talking patterns of 396 university students who volunteered to participate in the study. The device was programmed to record 30 seconds of sound every 12.5 minutes without the carrier's knowledge. According to a published report of the study in Scientific American, "Men showed a slightly wider variability in words uttered.... But in the end, the sexes came out just about even in the daily averages: women at 16,215 words and men at \(15,669 . " 56\) This difference was not statistically significant. What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain.

A study sought to determine whether the ancient Chinese art of acupuncture could help infertile women become pregnant.' One hundred sixty healthy women undergoing assisted reproductive therapy were recruited for the study. Half of the subjects were randomly assigned to receive acupuncture treatment 25 minutes before embryo transfer and again 25 minutes after the transfer. The remaining 80 subjects were instructed to lie still for 25 minutes after the embryo transfer. Results: In the acupuncture group, 34 women became pregnant. In the control group, 21 women became pregnant. (a) Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the two treatments? (b) The difference in the percent of women who became pregnant in the two groups is statistically significant. Explain what this means to someone who knows little statistics. (c) Explain why the design of the study prevents us from concluding that acupuncture caused the difference in pregnancy rates.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.