/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 61 The mean height of married Ameri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The mean height of married American women in their early twenties is 64.5 inches and the standard deviation is 2.5 inches. The mean height of married men the same age is 68.5 inches, with standard deviation 2.7 inches. The correlation between the heights of husbands and wives is about \(r=0.5\). (a) Find the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting a husband's height from his wife's height for married couples in their early 20 s. Show your work. (b) Suppose that the height of a randomly selected wife was 1 standard deviation below average. Predict the height of her husband without using the least-squares line. Show your work.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The regression equation is \( \hat{y} = 33.67 + 0.54x \). (b) Predicted husband's height is 67.25 inches.

Step by step solution

01

Determine Variables

Identify and define the variables and values provided in the problem.- Mean height of women: \( \bar{x} = 64.5 \) inches- Standard deviation of women's height: \( s_x = 2.5 \) inches- Mean height of men: \( \bar{y} = 68.5 \) inches- Standard deviation of men's height: \( s_y = 2.7 \) inches- Correlation coefficient: \( r = 0.5 \)
02

Calculate the Slope (b) of the Regression Line

The formula for the slope \( b \) of the regression line is:\[ b = r \times \left( \frac{s_y}{s_x} \right)\]Substitute the known values:\[ b = 0.5 \times \left( \frac{2.7}{2.5} \right) = 0.5 \times 1.08 = 0.54\]
03

Calculate the Intercept (a) of the Regression Line

The formula for the intercept \( a \) of the regression line is:\[ a = \bar{y} - b \times \bar{x}\]Substitute the known values:\[ a = 68.5 - 0.54 \times 64.5 = 68.5 - 34.83 = 33.67\]
04

Form the Regression Equation

Combine the slope and intercept to form the equation of the least-squares regression line:\[ \hat{y} = 33.67 + 0.54x\]where \( \hat{y} \) is the predicted husband's height based on the wife's height \( x \).
05

Apply Theoretical Prediction for Part (b)

For part (b), use the concept that the husband's height is expected to move from the mean by a factor of \( r \) given the wife's deviation from the mean.- Wife's height is 1 standard deviation below average: \(-1 \times s_x = -2.5\) inches deviation- Husband's predicted deviation: \(r \times (-2.5) = 0.5 \times (-2.5) = -1.25\) inches- Predicted husband's height: \(\bar{y} - 1.25 = 68.5 - 1.25 = 67.25\) inches
06

Verify Results

Ensure the regression equation and theoretical prediction align with expected statistical behavior and confirm calculations. Both derive logically from the correlation and given means.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often represented by the symbol \(r\), is a statistical measure that describes the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. In the context of the heights of husbands and wives, an \(r\) value of 0.5 indicates a moderate positive correlation.
This means that as the height of a wife increases, there is a tendency for the husband's height to increase as well. However, the correlation is not perfect; many other factors could influence the husband's height beyond the wife's height.Understanding the correlation coefficient is crucial when you're interpreting data involving two variables:
  • Values of \(r\) range from -1 to 1.
  • An \(r\) value of 1 implies a perfect positive linear relationship.
  • An \(r\) value of -1 implies a perfect negative linear relationship.
  • An \(r\) value close to 0 implies no linear relationship.
The correlation coefficient is key to predictive modeling, where we often use it to understand and quantify the relationship between predictors and outcomes. It's essential to remember that correlation does not imply causation.When using correlation in predictive modeling, such as forming a regression equation, it helps define how changes in one variable might be associated with changes in another. In this case, how the height of a wife might indicate changes in her husband's height.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion in a set of values. In simpler terms, it tells us how spread out the numbers are around the mean. For the heights of married men and women in their early twenties, the standard deviations are given as 2.5 inches and 2.7 inches respectively.
This means that, on average, individuals' heights vary by these amounts from the average height. Why is standard deviation important?
  • It provides a measure of the typical distance each data point is from the mean.
  • A larger standard deviation indicates a wider distribution of values.
  • It helps in understanding how much individual data points deviate from the average.
In predictive modeling, standard deviation helps determine how unusual a particular observation might be. For instance, if a wife's height is 1 standard deviation below average, we know precisely how much lower than average that is. Coupled with the correlation, we can predict how the husband's height would deviate using this information. Standard deviation, alongside mean values, is essential for calculating predictive equations such as the least-squares regression line, where it's used to standardize differences and ultimately to help derive the predicted outcomes.
Predictive Modeling
Predictive modeling involves using statistical techniques to create a model that can predict future outcomes based on current data. The least-squares regression line is one such tool used in predictive modeling. It helps us predict one variable based on the known values of another variable, leveraging their linear relationship.
In the exercise, we're tasked with predicting the husband's height from the wife's height using the least-squares regression line. The process involves several key components:
  • Calculating the slope \(b\): It shows how the dependent variable (husband's height) changes with a unit change in the independent variable (wife's height).
  • Determining the intercept \(a\): It represents the predicted husband's height when the wife's height is exactly the mean height.
  • Formulating the regression equation: This equation uses both the slope and intercept to make predictions.
Predictive modeling isn’t just about forming equations. It’s about understanding relationships and variations, such as those defined by the correlation coefficient and standard deviation. It involves interpreting these measures to offer meaningful predictions.
By leveraging predictive modeling, we can make educated guesses about one variable by understanding the patterns and relationships with another. This application is crucial in many fields, from personalistic predictions, like in this height example, to business, healthcare, and many other domains.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 10 (page 160 ) presented data on the lean body mass and resting metabolic rate for 12 women who were subjects in a study of dieting. Lean body mass, given in kilograms, is a person's weight leaving out all fat. Metabolic rate, in calories burned per 24 hours, is the rate at which the body consumes energy. Here are the data again. $$\begin{array}{llllllll}\hline \text { Mass: } & 36.1 & 54.6 & 48.5 & 42.0 & 50.6 & 42.0 & 40.3 & 33.1 & 42.4 & 34.5 & 51.1 & 41.2 \\\\\text { Rate: } & 995 & 1425 & 1396 & 1418 & 1502 & 1256 & 1189 & 9131124 & 1052 & 1347 & 1204 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (a) Use your calculator to help make a scatterplot. (b) Use your calculator's regression function to find the equation of the least-squares regression line. Add this line to your scatterplot from part (a). (c) Explain in words what the slope of the regression line tells us. (d) Calculate and interpret the residual for the woman who had a lean body mass of \(50.6 \mathrm{~kg}\) and a metabolic rate of 1502 .

How sensitive to changes in water temperature are coral reefs? To find out, measure the growth of corals in aquariums where the water temperature is controlled at different levels. Growth is measured by weighing the coral before and after the experiment. What are the explanatory and response variables? Are they categorical or quantitative?

In its recent Fuel Economy Guide, the Environmental Protection Agency gives data on 1152 vehicles. There are a number of outliers, mainly vehicles with very poor gas mileage. If we ignore the outliers, however, the combined city and highway gas mileage of the other 1120 or so vehicles is approximately Normal with mean 18.7 miles per gallon (mpg) and standard deviation 4.3 mpg. How high must a vehicle's gas mileage be in order to fall in the top \(10 \%\) of all vehicles? (The distribution omits a few high outliers, mainly hybrid gas-electric vehicles.)

In its recent Fuel Economy Guide, the Environmental Protection Agency gives data on 1152 vehicles. There are a number of outliers, mainly vehicles with very poor gas mileage. If we ignore the outliers, however, the combined city and highway gas mileage of the other 1120 or so vehicles is approximately Normal with mean 18.7 miles per gallon (mpg) and standard deviation 4.3 mpg. The Chevrolet Malibu with a four-cylinder engine has a combined gas mileage of 25 mpg. What percent of all vehicles have worse gas mileage than the Malibu?

A college newspaper interviews a psychologist about student ratings of the teaching of faculty members. The psychologist says, "The evidence indicates that the correlation between the research productivity and teaching rating of faculty members is close to zero." The paper reports this as "Professor McDaniel said that good researchers tend to be poor teachers, and vice versa." Explain why the paper's report is wrong. Write a statement in plain language (don't use the word "correlation") to explain the psychologist's meaning.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.