/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 41 Killing bacteria Expose marine b... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Killing bacteria Expose marine bacteria to X-rays for time periods from 1 to 15 minutes. Here are the number of surviving bacteria (in hundreds) on a culture plate after each exposure time: \(^{21}\) $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \hline \text { Time } t & \text { Count } y & \text { Time } t & \text { Count } y \\ 1 & 355 & 9 & 56 \\ 2 & 211 & 10 & 38 \\ 3 & 197 & 11 & 36 \\ 4 & 166 & 12 & 32 \\ 5 & 142 & 13 & 21 \\ 6 & 106 & 14 & 19 \\ 7 & 104 & 15 & 15 \\ 8 & 60 & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Make a reasonably accurate scatterplot of the data by hand, using time as the explanatory variable. Describe what you see. (b) A scatterplot of the natural logarithm of the number of surviving bacteria versus time is shown below. Based on this graph, explain why it would be reasonable to use an exponential model to describe the relationship between count of bacteria and time. (c) Minitab output from a linear regression analysis on the transformed data is shown below. $$ \begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{lllll} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 5.97316 & 0.05978 & 99.92 & 0.000 \\ \text { Time } & -0.218425 & 0.006575 & -33.22 & 0.000 \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{lll} S=0.110016 & R-S q=98.8 \frac{8}{6} & R-S q(a d j)=98.7 \% \end{array} \end{aligned} $$ Give the equation of the least-squares regression line. Be sure to define any variables you use. (d) Use your model to predict the number of surviving bacteria after 17 minutes. Show your work.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The model predicts approximately 108 surviving bacteria after 17 minutes.

Step by step solution

01

Constructing a Scatterplot

To construct a scatterplot, we will plot the exposure time, \( t \), on the x-axis and the number of surviving bacteria \( y \) (in hundreds) on the y-axis. When looking at the scatterplot, we might observe a downward trend because the number of surviving bacteria seems to decrease as the exposure time increases.
02

Analyzing Logarithmic Transformation

A scatterplot of \( \ln(y) \) versus \( t \) should show a linear relationship if using an exponential model is appropriate. In this context, if the points roughly form a straight line, an exponential relationship can be assumed between \( y \) and \( t \).
03

Understanding Minitab Output

From Minitab, the linear regression equation for \( \ln(y) \) is displayed as \( \ln(y) = 5.97316 - 0.218425t \). In this equation, the coefficient of \(t\) is negative, indicating a decrease in the number of bacteria over time, while the constant provides the intercept. \( R^2 \) indicates a high degree of correlation (98.8%), suggesting a good fit for the model.
04

Formulating the Exponential Model

To convert the model back to bacteria count, take the exponential of both sides: \( y = e^{5.97316 - 0.218425t} \). Here, \( y \) represents the number of surviving bacteria and \( t \) the exposure time in minutes.
05

Predicting for 17 Minutes

Substitute \( t = 17 \) into the exponential model: \( y = e^{5.97316 - 0.218425 \times 17} \). After calculating, this yields \( y \approx 10.77 \), indicating approximately 108 bacteria (since \( y \) represents hundreds of bacteria).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scatterplot
Creating a scatterplot is one of the best ways to visualize the relationship between two variables. In the case of the exercise about killing bacteria, a scatterplot can help us observe how the bacterial count changes over time when exposed to X-rays. To make a scatterplot:
  • Plot time (in minutes) on the x-axis.
  • Plot the count of surviving bacteria (in hundreds) on the y-axis.
By analyzing this scatterplot, you'll notice that as the exposure time increases, the number of surviving bacteria decreases. The points may form a downward trend, revealing a negative correlation between the two variables. This trend suggests that longer exposure to X-rays reduces the number of bacteria, which is important for determining the effectiveness of the exposure over time.
Natural Logarithm Transformation
A natural logarithm transformation is a mathematical technique used to linearize data that follows an exponential trend. In this exercise, the number of surviving bacteria decreases exponentially with time. However, the relationship is not initially linear, making it difficult to use simple linear regression. To understand if an exponential model will work:
  • Take the natural logarithm of the bacterial count, denoted as \( \ln(y) \).
  • Create a scatterplot with \( \ln(y) \) versus time \( t \).
If the transformed data forms a roughly straight line when graphed, it suggests a linear relationship is present in the transformed data. This alignment implies that an exponential model is justified, as it shows that the data can be represented as an exponential function \( y = e^{a - bt} \). This simplification makes data analysis more manageable and regression more accurate.
Linear Regression
Linear regression is a statistical method used to model and analyze the relationships between variables. With the bacteria data, after logging the counts, we utilize linear regression on the transformed data to find a linear equation.Minitab output gives us the equation:\[ \ln(y) = 5.97316 - 0.218425t \]This equation helps us understand that:- The constant \(5.97316\) is the intercept, which represents the hypothetical scenario of zero exposure.- The coefficient of \( t \) (\(-0.218425\)) reflects the rate of change, showing how much \( \ln(y) \) decreases per unit time increase.A high \( R^2 \) value of 98.8% signifies an excellent fit, suggesting that our regression line accurately predicts the transformed bacterial count based on exposure time.
Bacterial Count Prediction
Predicting the bacterial count involves converting the regression equation from a natural logarithm scale back to the original bacterial count. Here's how you can predict the count after a certain time, such as 17 minutes:First, use the linear equation:\[ \ln(y) = 5.97316 - 0.218425 \times 17 \]Calculate to find:\[ \ln(y) = 2.37627 \]Then, exponentiate both sides to solve for \( y \):\[ y = e^{2.37627} \approx 10.77 \]Thus, the prediction translates to approximately 108 surviving bacteria (since \( y \) represents hundreds of bacteria). This predictive method allows you to estimate the decrease in surviving bacteria over time effectively, supporting studies on bacterial resistance or eradication through X-ray exposure.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Multiple choice: Select the best answer for Exercises, which are based on the following information. To determine property taxes, Florida reappraises real estate every year, and the county appraiser's Web site lists the current "fair market value" of each piece of property. Property usually sells for somewhat more than the appraised market value. We collected data on the appraised market values \(x\) and actual selling prices \(y\) (in thousands of dollars) of a random sample of 16 condominium units in Florida. We checked that the conditions for inference about the slope of the population regression line are met. Here is part of the Minitab output from a least-squares regression analysis using these data. \({ }^{13}\) $$ \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 127.27 & 79.49 & 1.60 & 0.132 \\ \text { Appraisal } & 1.0466 & 0.1126 & 9.29 & 0.000 \\ \mathrm{~S}=69.7299 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=86.1 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj}) & =85.1 \% \end{array} $$ A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the population slope \(\beta\) is (a) \(1.0466 \pm 1.046\). (d) \(1.0466 \pm 0.2207\). (b) \(1.0466 \pm 0.2415\) (e) \(1.0466 \pm 0.2400\). (c) \(1.0466 \pm 0.2387\).

Multiple choice: Select the best answer for Exercises, which are based on the following information. To determine property taxes, Florida reappraises real estate every year, and the county appraiser's Web site lists the current "fair market value" of each piece of property. Property usually sells for somewhat more than the appraised market value. We collected data on the appraised market values \(x\) and actual selling prices \(y\) (in thousands of dollars) of a random sample of 16 condominium units in Florida. We checked that the conditions for inference about the slope of the population regression line are met. Here is part of the Minitab output from a least-squares regression analysis using these data. \({ }^{13}\) $$ \begin{array}{lllll} \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { SE Coef } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ \text { Constant } & 127.27 & 79.49 & 1.60 & 0.132 \\ \text { Appraisal } & 1.0466 & 0.1126 & 9.29 & 0.000 \\ \mathrm{~S}=69.7299 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}=86.1 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{Sq}(\mathrm{adj}) & =85.1 \% \end{array} $$ Which of the following is the best interpretation for the value 0.1126 in the computer output? (a) For each increase of \(\$ 1000\) in appraised value, the average selling price increases by about 0.1126 . (b) When using this model to predict selling price, the predictions will typically be off by about 0.1126 . (c) \(11.26 \%\) of the variation in selling price is accounted for by the linear relationship between selling price and appraised value. (d) There is a weak, positive linear relationship between selling price and appraised value. (e) In repeated samples of size 16 , the sample slope will typically vary from the population slope by about \(0.1126 .\)

Exercises 25 to 28 refer to the following setting. Does the color in which words are printed affect your ability to read them? Do the words themselves affect your ability to name the color in which they are printed? Mr. Starnes designed a study to investigate these questions using the 16 students in his AP \(^{\text {R }}\) Statistics class as subjects. Each student performed two tasks in a random order while a partner timed: ( 1 ) read 32 words aloud as quickly as possible, and ( 2 ) say the color in which each of 32 words is printed as quickly as possible. Try both tasks for yourself using the word list below $$ \begin{array}{llll} \text { YELLOW } & \text { RED } & \text { BLUE } & \text { GREEN } \\ \text { RED } & \text { GREEN } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { YELLOW } \\ \text { GREEN } & \text { RED } & \text { BLUE } & \text { BLUE } \\ \text { YELLOW } & \text { BLUE } & \text { GREEN } & \text { RED } \\ \text { BLUE } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { RED } & \text { RED } \\ \text { RED } & \text { BLUE } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { GREN } \\ \text { BLUE } & \text { GREEN } & \text { GREEN } & \text { BLUE } \\ \text { GREEN } & \text { YELLOW } & \text { RED } & \text { YELLOW } \end{array} $$ Color words (4.2) Let's review the design of the study. (a) Explain why this was an experiment and not an observational study. (b) Did Mr. Starnes use a completely randomized design or a randomized block design? Why do you think he chose this experimental design? (c) Explain the purpose of the random assignment in the context of the study. The data from Mr. Starnes's experiment are shown below. For each subject, the time to perform the two tasks is given to the nearest second. $$ \begin{array}{cccccc} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { Words } & \text { Colors } & \text { Subject } & \text { Words } & \text { Colors } \\ 1 & 13 & 20 & 9 & 10 & 16 \\ 2 & 10 & 21 & 10 & 9 & 13 \\ 3 & 15 & 22 & 11 & 11 & 11 \\ 4 & 12 & 25 & 12 & 17 & 26 \\ 5 & 13 & 17 & 13 & 15 & 20 \\ 6 & 11 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 15 \\ 7 & 14 & 32 & 15 & 12 & 18 \\ 8 & 16 & 21 & 16 & 10 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Multiple Choice: Select the best answer for Exercises Some high school physics students dropped a ball and measured the distance fallen (in centimeters) a various times (in seconds) after its release. If you have studied physics, then you probably know that the theoretical relationship between the variables is distance \(=490(\text { time })^{2}\). A scatterplot of the students" data showed a clear curved pattern. At 0.68 seconds after release, the ball had fallen 220.4 centimeters. How much more or less did the ball fall than the theoretical model predicts? (a) More by 226.576 centimeters (b) More by 6.176 centimeters (c) No more and no less (d) Less by 226.576 centimeters (e) Less by 6.176 centimeters

Determining tree biomass It is easy to measure the "diameter at breast height" of a tree. It's hard to measure the total "aboveground biomass" of a tree, because to do this you must cut and weigh the tree. The biomass is important for studies of ecology, so ecologists commonly estimate it using a power model. Combining data on 378 trees in tropical rain forests gives this relationship between biomass \(y\) measured in kilograms and diameter \(x\) measured in centimeters: \(^{20}\) $$ \widehat{\ln y}=-2.00+2.42 \ln x $$ Use this model to estimate the biomass of a tropical tree 30 centimeters in diameter. Show your work.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.