/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 Students and catalog shopping Wh... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Students and catalog shopping What is the most important reason that students buy from catalogs? The answer may differ for different groups of students. Here are results for separate random samples of American and Asian students at a large midwestern university: \(^{26}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \text { American } & \text { Asian } \\ \text { Save time } & 29 & 10 \\ \text { Easy } & 28 & 11 \\ \text { Low price } & 17 & 34 \\ \text { Live far from stores } & 11 & 4 \\ \text { No pressure to buy } & 10 & 3 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Should we use a chi-square test for homogeneity or a chi-square test for independence in this setting? Justify your answer. (b) State appropriate hypotheses for performing the type of test you chose in part (a). (c) Check that the conditions for carrying out the test are met. (d) Interpret the \(P\) -value in context. What conclusion would you draw?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use a chi-square test for homogeneity to determine if the distribution of shopping reasons differs between American and Asian students.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Proper Test

We are comparing the distribution of reasons for catalog shopping for two different independent groups of students: American and Asian. In this scenario, a chi-square test for homogeneity is appropriate because we want to see if the distribution of preferences is consistent across these two different groups.
02

Formulate Hypotheses

For a chi-square test for homogeneity, the null hypothesis ( H_0 ) is that the distribution of reasons for catalog shopping is the same for both American and Asian students. The alternative hypothesis ( H_1 ) is that the distributions are different among the groups.
03

Check Test Conditions

To conduct a chi-square test, we must ensure the conditions are met: (1) All expected counts should be at least 5. Calculate expected counts by multiplying row totals by column totals and dividing by the grand total. Verify if all computed expected counts meet this criterion.
04

Calculate Expected Counts

Compute the expected counts for each cell: \[\text{Expected Count} = \frac{(\text{Row Total})(\text{Column Total})}{\text{Grand Total}}\]. This calculation should be done for each category under both student groups to confirm if all are at least 5.
05

Compute P-value

Using the calculated expected counts, compute the chi-square statistic and find the corresponding p-value from the chi-square distribution table. This value represents the probability of observing the data if the null hypothesis is true.
06

Interpret the P-value

A low p-value (typically less than 0.05) suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference in the distributions of reasons between student groups. If the p-value is high, it suggests insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
07

Conclusion

Based on the computed p-value, decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, and accordingly conclude if there is a significant difference in reasons for catalog shopping between American and Asian students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Groups
When conducting statistical tests like the chi-square test for homogeneity, it's crucial to understand the concept of independent groups. Here, independent groups mean that the samples are drawn from populations that do not influence each other.
In this exercise, American and Asian students represent two distinct and separate groups. Each group's preferences are evaluated without the other group's data influencing it.
This independence is vital as it ensures that any observed differences in preferences are due to actual differences between the groups, not due to any overlap or mixing in the data.
  • This makes the results more credible and reliable.
  • Remember, mixing or overlapping groups would invalidate our results, as it would introduce bias or confounding factors.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a foundational concept in statistics, and it's pivotal to hypothesis testing, including the chi-square test for homogeneity.
In simple terms, the null hypothesis is an assumption that there's no effect or no difference. It's the default position that indicates no relationship between the groups being compared.
In our context, the null hypothesis is that the distribution of reasons for catalog shopping is the same for both American and Asian students.
  • This assumption acts as a starting point for statistical testing.
  • Proving or disproving this hypothesis guides us in understanding the relationships between variables.
By statistically testing this, we can confirm whether what we observe is likely due to chance or signifies a real difference between groups.
Expected Counts
Expected counts are an integral part of the chi-square test calculation. They help us understand what the distribution of observed data would look like if the null hypothesis were true.
To calculate expected counts for each category, we use the formula: \[ \text{Expected Count} = \frac{(\text{Row Total})(\text{Column Total})}{\text{Grand Total}}\] Each expected count represents the number of observations we'd predict to fall into a category if there were no real difference between the groups.
  • Ensuring all expected counts are at least 5 is crucial.
  • This condition validates the accuracy of the chi-square approximation.
By comparing these expected counts with the actual data, we can investigate whether there are significant differences between what we expect under the null hypothesis and what we observe.
P-value Interpretation
Interpreting the p-value is perhaps the most crucial part of hypothesis testing, as it tells us about the strength of our results. The p-value quantifies the probability of observing the data if the null hypothesis is true.
In other words, a low p-value, typically less than 0.05, suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, leading us to reject it. This indicates that there is a significant difference between groups.
  • Conversely, a high p-value suggests insufficient evidence to dismiss the null hypothesis.
  • It means observed discrepancies might occur by random chance alone.
Thus, the p-value helps us decide whether the differences in the student groups are statistically significant and not due to random variability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Going Nuts The UR Nuts Company sells Deluxe and Premium nut mixes, both of which contain only cashews, brazil nuts, almonds, and peanuts. The Premium nuts are much more expensive than the Deluxe nuts. A consumer group suspects that the two nut mixes are really the same. To find out, the group took separate random samples of 20 pounds of each nut mix and recorded the weights of each type of nut in the sample. Here are the data: \({ }^{18}\) $$ \begin{array}{lcc} {\text { Type of mix }} \\ \text { Type of nut } & \text { Premium } & \text { Deluxe } \\ \text { Cashew } & 6 \mathrm{lb} & 5 \mathrm{lb} \\ \text { Brazil nut } & 3 \mathrm{lb} & 4 \mathrm{lb} \\ \text { Almond } & 5 \mathrm{lb} & 6 \mathrm{lb} \\ \text { Peanut } & 6 \mathrm{lb} & 5 \mathrm{lb} \end{array} $$ Explain why we can't use a chi-square test to determine whether these two distributions differ significantly.

Seagulls by the seashore Do seagulls show a preference for where they land? To answer this question, biologists conducted a study in an enclosed outdoor space with a piece of shore whose area was made up of \(56 \%\) sand, \(29 \%\) mud, and \(15 \%\) rocks. The biologists chose 200 seagulls at random. Each seagull was released into the outdoor space on its own and observed until it landed somewhere on the piece of shore. In all, 128 seagulls landed on the sand, 61 landed in the mud, and 11 landed on the rocks. Do these data provide convincing evidence that seagulls show a preference for where they land?

You say tomato The paper "linkage Studies of the Tomato" (Transactions of the Canadian Institute, 1931 ) reported the following data on phenotypes resulting from crossing tall cut-leaf tomatoes with dwarf potato-leaf tomatoes. We wish to investigate whether the following frequencies are consistent with genetic laws, which state that the phenotypes should occur in the ratio 9: 3: 3: 1 . $$ \begin{array}{lcccc} \hline \text { Phenotype: } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Tall } \\ \text { cut } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Tall } \\ \text { potato } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Dwarf } \\ \text { cut } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Dwarf } \\ \text { potato } \end{array} \\ \text { Frequency: } & 926 & 288 & 293 & 104 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assume that the conditions for inference were met. Carry out an appropriate test of the proposed genetic model. What do you conclude?

Is your random number generator working? Use your calculator's RandInt function to generate 200 digits from 0 to 9 and store them in a list. (a) State appropriate hypotheses for a chi-square test for goodness of fit to determine whether your calculator's random number generator gives each digit an equal chance to be generated. (b) Carry out a test at the \(\alpha=0.05\) significance level. For parts (c) and (d), assume that the students' random number generators are all working properly. (c) What is the probability that a student who does this exercise will make a Type I error? (d) Suppose that 25 students in an AP Statistics class independently do this exercise for homework. Find the probability that at least one of them makes a Type I error.

Skittles Statistics teacher Jason Molesky contacted Mars, Inc., to ask about the color distribution for Skittles candies. Here is an excerpt from the response he received: "The original flavor blend for the SKITTLES BITE SIZE CANDIES is lemon, lime, orange, strawberry and grape. They were chosen as a result of consumer preference tests we conducted. The flavor blend is 20 percent of each flavor." (a) State appropriate hypotheses for a significance test of the company's claim. (b) Find the expected counts for a bag of Skittles with 60 candies. (c) How large a \(\chi^{2}\) statistic would you need to have significant evidence against the company's claim at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level? At the \(\alpha=0.01\) level? (d) Create a set of observed counts for a bag with 60 candies that gives a \(P\) -value between 0.01 and \(0.05 .\) Show the calculation of your chi-square statistic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.