/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 A study of child care enrolled 1... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A study of child care enrolled 1364 infants and followed them through their sixth year in school. Later, the researchers published an article in which they stated that 鈥渢he more time children spent in child care from birth to age four-and-a-half, the more adults tended to rate them, both at age four-and-a- half and at kindergarten, as less likely to get along with others, as more assertive, as disobedient, and as aggressive." \(^{31}\) (a) Is this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer. (b) What are the explanatory and response variables? (c) Does this study show that child care causes children to be more aggressive? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Observational study. (b) Explanatory: time in child care; Response: behavior ratings. (c) No causation, only correlation shown.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Type of Study

The first step is to determine whether the study is observational or experimental. In this context, no treatment or controlled variable was applied to the participants by the researchers, they merely observed their behavior in natural settings over time. This indicates that the study is an observational study rather than an experiment.
02

Determine the Explanatory and Response Variables

The explanatory variable is the primary variablethought to influence the response. In this case, it is the amount of time children spent in child care from birth to age four-and-a-half. The response variables include how adults rate children's behavior, specifically in terms of their ability to get along with others, assertiveness, obedience, and aggression.
03

Analyze Causation vs. Correlation

Observational studies can show correlation but not causation due to the lack of controlled experimentation. While the study shows a correlation between time spent in child care and certain behaviors, it cannot definitively state that child care causes these behaviors because other confounding variables may be at play.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
An observational study in statistics is a type of research where the researchers observe subjects and measure variables of interest without assigning treatments to the subjects. In the context of the study about child care, researchers tracked the progress and behavior of infants through their sixth year in school. Importantly, they did not intervene or manipulate any variables; they simply recorded what naturally occurred.

Unlike experiments that actively apply a treatment, observational studies merely observe what happens in regular conditions. This is ideal for studying effects where ethical or practical constraints make an experiment infeasible. However, it also means that these studies can identify associations, not causation. This is because there is no control group to compare a treatment group against, making it challenging to isolate the effect of a single variable.
Explanatory Variable
An explanatory variable, also known as an independent variable, is one that researchers believe may cause changes in the behavior or the outcome being studied. In the child care study, the explanatory variable is the amount of time children spent in child care from birth to age four-and-a-half.

This variable is crucial as it is hypothesized to influence children's later behavior. By measuring how much time each child spent in care, researchers aimed to explore its effects on various behavioral outcomes.

Understanding the explanatory variable helps researchers design studies and analyze data effectively, as it is central to formulating hypotheses about relationships between variables.
Response Variable
The response variable, or dependent variable, is the outcome that researchers aim to explain or predict. In the child care study, the response variables were the ratings of children's behaviors, such as their ability to get along with others, assertiveness, obedience, and aggression.

Researchers wanted to see if there was a pattern or change in these behaviors based on the explanatory variable, which is the time spent in child care. They rated children's behaviors both at age four-and-a-half and in kindergarten.

A clear understanding of the response variable is crucial in interpreting study results, as it helps clarify what outcomes are being influenced or linked to the explanatory variables.
Causation vs. Correlation
Causation and correlation are essential concepts in understanding results from studies, especially in observational research. Correlation implies a relationship or association between two variables; however, it doesn't mean that one causes the other to happen.

In the mentioned study, researchers found a correlation between time spent in child care and certain behavioral traits such as aggression. Nonetheless, due to the nature of an observational study, such a correlation cannot definitively indicate causation. Causation would require an experimental setup where confounding variables can be controlled.

It's important to note that while a correlation can initially suggest that further investigation is warranted, relying solely on observational data for causal claims can lead to inaccurate conclusions due to the possibility of unseen confounding factors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A double-blind experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the Salk polio vaccine. The purpose of keeping the diagnosing physicians unaware of the treatment status of the experimental subjects was to (a) eliminate grounds for malpractice suits. (b) ensure that subjects were randomly assigned to treatments. (c) eliminate a possible source of bias. (d) make sure nobody is harmed. (e) avoid the placebo effect.

A University of Helsinki (Finland) study wanted to determine if chocolate consumption during pregnancy had an effect on infant temperament at age 6 months. Researchers began by asking 305 healthy pregnant women to report their chocolate consumption. Six months after birth, the researchers asked mothers to rate their infants鈥 temperament, including smiling, laughter, and fear. The babies born to women who had been eating chocolate daily during pregnancy were found to be more active and "positively reactive" - a measure that the investigators said encompasses traits like smiling and laughter. \(^{30}\) (a) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer. (b) What are the explanatory and response variables? (c) Does this study show that eating chocolate regularly during pregnancy helps produce infants with good temperament? Explain.

Do abandoned children placed in foster homes do better than similar children placed in an institution? The Bucharest Early Intervention Project found that the answer is a clear 鈥淵es.鈥 The subjects were 136 young children abandoned at birth and living in orphanages in Bucharest, Romania. Half of the children, chosen at random, were placed in foster homes. The other half remained in the orphanages.\(^{55}\) (Foster care was not easily available in Romania at the time and so was paid for by the study.) What conclusion can we draw from this study? Explain.

Which of two brands of electric razor shaves closer? Describe how you would design and carry out an experiment to answer this question using 50 adult male volunteers.

Fizz Laboratories, a pharmaceutical company, has developed a new drug for relieving chronic pain. Sixty patients suffering from arthritis and needing pain relief are available. Each patient will be treated and asked an hour later, 鈥淎bout what percent of pain relief did you experience?鈥 (a) Why should Fizz not simply administer the new drug and record the patients鈥 responses? (b) Should the patients be told whether they are getting the new drug or a placebo? How would this knowledge probably affect their reactions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.