/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Aw, nuts! A company claims that ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Aw, nuts! A company claims that each batch of its deluxe mixed nuts contains 52% cashews, 27% almonds, 13% macadamia nuts, and 8% brazil nuts. To test this claim, a quality control inspector takes a random sample of 150 nuts from the latest batch. The one-way table below displays the sample data. (a) State appropriate hypotheses for performing a test of the company鈥檚 claim. (b) Calculate the expected counts for each type of nut. Show your work.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Test the null hypothesis that observed proportions match claimed ones, expected counts are: 78 cashews, 40.5 almonds, 19.5 macadamias, 12 brazil nuts.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We are given a company's claim about the proportion of different types of nuts in a batch, which are 52% cashews, 27% almonds, 13% macadamia nuts, and 8% brazil nuts. We are also given a sample of 150 nuts taken by a quality control inspector. Our task is to set up appropriate hypotheses and calculate the expected counts for each type of nut to test the company's claim.
02

State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

For this type of test, we are conducting a chi-square goodness-of-fit. Our null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) is that the distribution of nuts in the sample follows the company's stated proportions. Formally, \( H_0: \) \( p_{cashews}=0.52, \) \( p_{almonds}=0.27, \) \( p_{macadamia}=0.13, \) \( p_{brazil}=0.08 \). The alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)) is that at least one of the proportions differs from the company's claims.
03

Calculate the Expected Counts

To calculate the expected counts for each type of nut, multiply the total sample size (150 nuts) by each claimed proportion. This gives us: - Expected count of cashews = 150 \( \times \) 0.52 = 78. - Expected count of almonds = 150 \( \times \) 0.27 = 40.5. - Expected count of macadamia nuts = 150 \( \times \) 0.13 = 19.5. - Expected count of brazil nuts = 150 \( \times \) 0.08 = 12.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test
The chi-square goodness-of-fit test is a statistical method used to determine if a sample data matches a population with a specific distribution. In essence, it helps us verify claims about the distribution of categorical data. The method involves comparing the observed counts from the sample to the expected counts based on hypothesized proportions. This test is particularly useful when you want to see if there are significant differences between what was expected and what was actually observed.
  • It quantifies the discrepancies between expected and observed data.
  • It is applicable when you have one categorical variable with two or more levels.
The chi-square statistic is calculated using the formula: \[\chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_i - E_i)^2}{E_i}\]where \( O_i \) represents the observed frequency, and \( E_i \) represents the expected frequency. After computing, the statistic is compared to a critical value from a chi-square distribution to make inferences.
Expected Counts
Expected counts are the theoretically predicted frequencies of occurrences in each category of a sample, based on the null hypothesis. To calculate expected counts, you multiply the total number of observations by the proportion expected under the null hypothesis. This gives us an idea of what the distribution of the sample should look like if the null hypothesis is true.
  • Calculation for each category: \( E = n \times p \), where \( n \) is the total sample size, and \( p \) is the proportion claimed.
For example, if a company claims that 52% of its mixed nuts are cashews, in a sample of 150 nuts, you would expect:
  • Cashews: 150 \( \times \) 0.52 = 78
  • Almonds: 150 \( \times \) 0.27 = 40.5
  • Macadamia nuts: 150 \( \times \) 0.13 = 19.5
  • Brazil nuts: 150 \( \times \) 0.08 = 12
These figures serve as benchmarks to compare against the actual sampled counts.
Proportions
Proportions represent the relative part of the whole, often expressed as percentages or decimals. In the context of hypothesis testing, they are the expected percentages that a particular characteristic should take according to the null hypothesis.
In our problem, the company's claim sets forth proportions for each type of nut:
  • 52% cashews
  • 27% almonds
  • 13% macadamia nuts
  • 8% brazil nuts
These proportions form the basis of the null hypothesis. Understanding proportions is crucial because it guides how we calculate expected counts and analyze our sample data. When actual sample data varies considerably from these proportions, it might suggest that the claim doesn't hold, prompting a chi-square test.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In statistical testing, formulating the null and alternative hypotheses is essential, as they define what you are testing. The null hypothesis (H_0) is a statement of no effect or no difference, suggesting that any deviation in the data is due to chance.
  • For our problem, the null hypothesis is that the actual proportions match the company's stated values: \( H_0: p_{cashews}=0.52, p_{almonds}=0.27, p_{macadamia}=0.13, p_{brazil}=0.08 \).
Contrastingly, the alternative hypothesis (H_a) suggests that there's some effect or difference, meaning at least one of the true proportions differs from the stated values.
  • In our testing, the alternative hypothesis claims that the proportions do not match the company's claims entirely or partially.
Testing these hypotheses through observed data helps determine if there's enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This framework is central to statistical inference, allowing us to make sound decisions or conclusions based on sample data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A survey by the National Institutes of Health asked a random sample of young adults (aged 19 to 25 years), 鈥淲here do you live now? That is, where do you stay most often?鈥 Here is the full two-way table (omitting a few who refused to answer and one who claimed to be homeless):30 (a) Should we use a chi-square test for homogeneity or a chi-square test of association/independence in this setting? Justify your answer. (b) State appropriate hypotheses for performing the type of test you chose in part (a). Minitab output from a chi-square test is shown below. (c) Check that the conditions for carrying out the test are met. (d) Interpret the P-value in context. What conclusion would you draw?

An appropriate null hypothesis to test whether the trees in the forest are randomly distributed is (a) H0:M 25, where M the mean number of trees in each quadrant. (b) H0:p 0.25, where p the proportion of all trees in the forest that are in Quadrant 1. (c) H0:n1 n2 n3 n4 25, where ni is the number of trees from the sample in Quadrant i. (d) H0:p1 p2 p3 p4 0.25, where pi is the actual proportion of trees in the forest that are in Quadrant i. (e) H0:pppp 藛藛藛藛 1 2 3 4 0. , 25 where p藛 i is the proportion of trees in the sample that are in Quadrant i.

Opinions about the death penalty The General Social Survey asked a random sample of adults, 鈥淒o you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder?鈥 The following table gives the responses of people whose highest education was a high school degree and of people with a bachelor鈥檚 degree: \(\begin{array}{lll}{\text { High school }} & {1010} & {369} \\ {\text { Bachelor's }} & {319} & {185} \\ \hline\end{array}\) We can test the hypothesis of 鈥渘o difference鈥 in support for the death penalty among people in these educational categories in two ways: with a two-sample z test or with a chi-square test. (a) Minitab output for a chi-square test is shown below. State appropriate hypotheses and interpret the P-value in context. What conclusion would you draw? (b) Minitab output for a two-sample z test is shown below. Explain how these results are consistent with the test in part (a).

Yahtzee (5.3, 6.3) In the game of Yahtzee, 5 six-sided dice are rolled simultaneously. To get a Yahtzee, the player must get the same number on all 5 dice. (a) Luis says that the probability of getting a Yahtzee in one roll of the dice is \(\left(\frac{1}{6}\right)^{5} .\) Explain why Luis is wrong. (b) Nassir decides to keep rolling all 5 dice until he gets a Yahtzee. He is surprised when he still hasn鈥檛 gotten a Yahtzee after 25 rolls. Should he be? Calculate an appropriate probability to support your answer.

The P-value for a chi-square goodness-of-fit test is 0.0129. The correct conclusion is (a) reject H0 at A 0.05; there is strong evidence that the trees are randomly distributed. (b) reject H0 at A 0.05; there is not strong evidence that the trees are randomly distributed. (c) reject H0 at A 0.05; there is strong evidence that the trees are not randomly distributed. (d) fail to reject H0 at A 0.05; there is not strong evidence that the trees are randomly distributed. (e) fail to reject H0 at A 0.05; there is strong evidence that the trees are randomly distributed.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.