/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 130 (a) Given two complex numbers in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) Given two complex numbers in polar form: $$ w=r(\cos \theta+i \sin \theta), z=s(\cos \phi+i \sin \phi) $$ show that their product is precisely $$ w z=r s(\cos (\theta+\phi)+i \sin (\theta+\phi)) $$ (b) (de Moivre's Theorem: Abraham de Moivre \((1667-1754))\) Prove that $$ (\cos \theta+i \sin \theta)^{n}=\cos (n \theta)+i \sin (n \theta) $$ (c) Prove that, if $$ z=r(\cos \theta+i \sin \theta) $$ satisfies \(z^{n}=1\) for some integer \(n,\) then \(r=1\) The last three problems in this subsection look more closely at "roots of unity" \(-\) that is, roots of the polynomial equation \(x^{n}=1 .\) In the real domain, we know that: (i) when \(n\) is odd, the equation \(x^{n}=1\) has exactly one root, namely \(x=1 ;\) and (ii) when \(n\) is even, the equation \(x^{n}=1\) has just two solutions, namely \(x=\pm 1\). In contrast, in the complex domain, there are \(n " n^{\text {th }}\) roots of unity" . Problem \(\mathbf{1 3 0}(\mathrm{c})\) shows that these "roots of unity" all lie on the unit circle, centered at the origin. And if we put \(n \theta=2 k \pi\) in Problem \(130(\mathrm{~b})\) we see that the \(n n^{\text {th }}\) roots of unity include the point \(" 1=\cos 0+i \sin 0\) ", and are then equally spaced around that circle with \(\theta=\frac{2 k \pi}{n}(1 \leqslant k \leqslant n-1),\) and form the vertices of a regular \(n\) -gon.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The product is \(w z = r s(\cos(\theta + \phi) + i \sin(\theta + \phi))\). (b) De Moivre's Theorem is proven by induction. (c) If \(z^n=1\), then \(r=1\).

Step by step solution

01

Polar Form Multiplication Identity

Given two complex numbers in polar form \(w = r(\cos(\theta) + i \sin(\theta))\) and \(z = s(\cos(\phi) + i \sin(\phi))\), their product can be expressed when multiplying the magnitudes \(r\) and \(s\), and using the angle sum identities for trigonometric functions: \[ w z = r s \left( (\cos(\theta) \cos(\phi) - \sin(\theta) \sin(\phi)) + i (\cos(\theta) \sin(\phi) + \sin(\theta) \cos(\phi)) \right) \] Using trigonometric identities: \[ \cos(A + B) = \cos(A)\cos(B) - \sin(A)\sin(B) \] \[ \sin(A + B) = \cos(A)\sin(B) + \sin(A)\cos(B) \] Thus, \[ w z = rs(\cos(\theta + \phi) + i \sin(\theta + \phi)) \] showing that the product of two complex numbers in polar form results in a complex number whose magnitude is the product of the magnitudes and whose angle is the sum of the angles.
02

De Moivre's Theorem Proof

We want to prove that \[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^{n} = \cos(n\theta) + i \sin(n\theta) \] Using mathematical induction on \(n\):- **Base case**: For \(n=1\), the equation holds as \[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta \]- **Inductive step**: Assume the formula holds for \(n = k\), that is, \[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^{k} = \cos(k\theta)+ i \sin(k\theta) \]Then for \(n=k+1\), the left-hand side is: \[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^{k+1} = (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^{k} (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) \]Using the inductive hypothesis, we can substitute:\[ = (\cos(k\theta)+ i \sin(k\theta)) (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) \]Using the polar form multiplication finding: \[ = (\cos(k\theta + \theta) + i \sin(k\theta + \theta)) \]\[ = (\cos((k+1)\theta) + i \sin((k+1)\theta)) \] Thus, by induction, the formula holds for all integers \(n\).
03

Proving the Magnitude Condition for Unity Roots

Given \(z = r(\cos \theta+i \sin \theta)\) and \(z^{n}=1\), first rewrite \(1\) in polar form as \(1(\cos 0 + i \sin 0)\).Calculating the nth power:\[ z^{n} = (r(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta))^{n} = r^{n}(\cos(n\theta) + i \sin(n\theta)) \]Equating to \(1\):\[ r^{n}(\cos(n\theta) + i \sin(n\theta)) = 1(\cos 0 + i \sin 0) \]If the magnitudes are equal, then:\[ r^{n} = 1 \Rightarrow r=1 \] since \(r\) is real and positive.This shows that if \(z^{n} = 1\), then indeed \(r=1\), confirming that "roots of unity" lie on the unit circle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Multiplication of Complex Numbers
Multiplying complex numbers can be easier when they're in polar form. A complex number can be represented as \( w = r(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) \) and \( z = s(\cos \phi + i \sin \phi) \). To multiply these two, the magnitudes \( r \) and \( s \) are multiplied together, and the angles \( \theta \) and \( \phi \) are added up.
Using the trigonometric identities:
- \( \cos(A + B) = \cos(A)\cos(B) - \sin(A)\sin(B) \)
- \( \sin(A + B) = \cos(A)\sin(B) + \sin(A)\cos(B) \)
we find that when the two polar forms multiply, their resulting form is:
\[ w z = r s(\cos(\theta + \phi) + i \sin(\theta + \phi)) \]
This result shows that the product of two complex numbers in polar form is another complex number, with its magnitude being the product of the two magnitudes, and its "angle" being the sum of the angles.
De Moivre's Theorem
De Moivre's Theorem provides a very handy way to calculate powers of complex numbers in polar form. The theorem states:
\[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^n = \cos(n\theta) + i \sin(n\theta) \]
This means that raising a complex number (in polar form) to the power of \( n \) simply raises its angle by \( n \) times. A simple way to understand this is through mathematical induction.
**Base case**: For \( n = 1 \), the expression naturally holds as:
\[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta \]
**Inductive step**: We assume it holds for a case when \( n = k \), meaning:
\[ (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^k = \cos(k\theta) + i \sin(k\theta) \]
Then for \( n = k + 1 \), we calculate by multiplying:
\( (\cos \theta + i \sin \theta)^{k+1} = (\cos(k\theta) + i \sin(k\theta))(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) \)
Using the multiplication and angle addition mentioned before, we find that the theorem holds. Thus, De Moivre’s Theorem is a powerful tool for calculations involving powers of complex numbers in polar form.
Roots of Unity
Roots of unity are specific complex numbers that, when raised to a specified power, equal one. In polar form, a complex number \( z = r(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta) \) satisfies \( z^n = 1 \).
To solve for these, we represent 1 as \( 1(\cos 0 + i \sin 0) \), meaning roots of the equation are:
\[ z^n = r^n(\cos(n\theta) + i \sin(n\theta)) = 1 \]
For this equation to hold, \( r^n = 1 \), which means \( r = 1 \), implying that these roots lie on the unit circle. The angles are given by \( n\theta = 2k\pi \), resulting in \( \theta = \frac{2k\pi}{n} \), where \( k \) ranges from 0 to \( n-1 \).
This implies that the \( n \)th roots of unity are evenly distributed around the unit circle, forming the vertices of a regular \( n \)-gon.
Mathematical Induction
Mathematical induction is a proof technique commonly employed in mathematics to verify the truth of an infinite sequence of statements. The process consists of two main parts: the base case and the inductive step.
**Base Case**: One proves that the statement holds for the initial value (usually \( n=1 \)). This verifies that the property is true at the starting point of the sequence.
**Inductive Step**: Here, one assumes that the statement is true for a particular case \( n=k \), called the "induction hypothesis." You then show this implies the statement is also true for \( n=k+1 \).
This technique is often used to prove assertions like De Moivre’s Theorem, where the formula is established for a simple value, and its consistency is demonstrated for all larger values. If both parts succeed, the statement holds universally for all integers following the base case.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a)(i) Suppose \(a^{n}-1=p\) is a prime. Prove that \(a=2\) and that \(n\) must itself be prime. (ii) How many primes are there among the first five such numbers $$ 2^{2}-1,2^{3}-1,2^{5}-1,2^{7}-1,2^{11}-1 ? $$ (b)(i) Suppose \(a^{n}+1=p\) is a prime. Prove that either \(a=1\), or \(a\) must be even and that \(n\) must then be a power of 2 . (ii) In the simplest case, where \(a=2\), how many primes are there among the first five such numbers $$ 2^{1}+1,2^{2}+1,2^{4}+1,2^{8}+1,2^{16}+1 ? $$

(a) Write down the coordinates of the midpoint \(M\) of the line segment joining \(Y=(a, b)\) and \(Z=(c, d)\). Justify your answer. (b) Position a general triangle \(X Y Z\) so that the vertex \(X\) lies at the origin \((0,0) .\) Suppose that \(Y\) then has coordinates \((a, b)\) and \(Z\) has coordinates \((c, d) .\) Let \(M\) be the midpoint of \(X Y,\) and \(N\) be the midpoint of \(X Z\). Prove the Midpoint Theorem, namely that \(" M N\) is parallel to \(Y Z\) and half its length" (c) Given any quadrilateral \(A B C D\), let \(P\) be the midpoint of \(A B,\) let \(Q\) be the midpoint of \(B C\), let \(R\) be the midpoint of \(C D,\) and let \(S\) be the midpoint of \(D A .\) Prove that \(P Q R S\) is always a parallelogram.

The two hundred numbers $$ 1,2,3,4,5, \ldots, 200 $$ are written on the board. Students take turns to replace two numbers \(a, b\) from the current list by their sum divided by \(\sqrt{2}\). Eventually one number is left on the board. Prove that the final number must be less than \(2000 . \quad \triangle\)

(a) Write the inverse \((a+b i)^{-1}\) in the form \(c+d i\). (b) Write down a quadratic equation with real coefficients, which has \(a+b i\) as one root (where \(a\) and \(b\) are real numbers).

(Farey series) When the fully cancelled fractions in [0,1] with denominator \(\leqslant n\) are arranged in increasing order, the result is called the Farey series (or Farey sequence) of order \(n\). \(\begin{array}{ll}\text { Order 1: } & \frac{0}{1}<\frac{1}{1} \\ \text { Order } 2: & \frac{0}{1}<\frac{1}{2}<\frac{1}{1} \\ \text { Order 3: } & \frac{0}{1}<\frac{1}{3}<\frac{1}{2}<\frac{2}{3}<\frac{1}{1} \\ \text { Order 4: } & \frac{0}{1}<\frac{1}{4}<\frac{1}{3}<\frac{1}{2}<\frac{2}{3}<\frac{3}{4}<\frac{1}{1}\end{array}\) (a) Write down the full Farey series (or sequence) of order 7 . (b)(i) Imagine the points \(0.1,0.2,0.3, \ldots, 0.9\) dividing the interval [0,1] into ten subintervals of length \(\frac{1}{10}\). Now insert the eight points corresponding to $$ \frac{1}{9}, \frac{2}{9}, \frac{3}{9}, \ldots, \frac{8}{9} $$ Into which of the ten subintervals do they fall? (ii) Imagine the \(n\) points $$ \frac{1}{n+1}, \frac{2}{n+1}, \frac{3}{n+1}, \ldots, \frac{n}{n+1} $$ dividing the interval [0,1] into \(n+1\) subintervals of length \(\frac{1}{n+1}\). Now insert the \(n-1\) points $$ \frac{1}{n}, \frac{2}{n}, \frac{3}{n}, \ldots, \frac{n-1}{n} $$ Into which of the \(n+1\) subintervals do they fall? (iii) In passing from the Farey series of order \(n\) to the Farey series of order \(n+1,\) we insert fractions of the form \(\frac{k}{n+1}\) between certain pairs of adjacent fractions in the Farey series of order \(n\). If \(\frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}\) are adjacent fractions in the Farey series of order \(n\), prove that, when adding fractions for the Farey series of order \(n+1,\) at most one fraction is inserted between \(\frac{a}{b}\) and \(\frac{c}{d}\). (c) Note: It is worth struggling to prove the two results in part (c). But do not be surprised if they prove to be elusive \(-\) in which case, be prepared to simply use the result in part (c)(ii) to solve part (d). (i) In the Farey series of order \(n\) the first two fractions are \(\frac{0}{1}<\frac{1}{n},\) and the last two fractions are \(\frac{n-1}{n}<\frac{1}{1} .\) Prove that every other adjacent pair of fractions \(\frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}\) in the Farey series of order \(n\) satisfies \(b d>n\) (ii) Let \(\frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}\) be adjacent fractions in the Farey series of order \(n\). Prove (by induction on \(n)\) that \(b c-a d=1\). (d) Prove that if $$ \frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}<\frac{e}{f} $$ are three successive terms in any Farey series, then $$ \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a+e}{b+f} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.