/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 39 Can Low-fat Food Labels Lead to ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Can Low-fat Food Labels Lead to Obesity? What are the effects of low-fat food labels on food consumption? Do people eat more of a snack food when the food is labeled as low-fat? The answer may depend both on whether the snack food is labeled low-fat and whether the label includes serving-size information. An experiment investigated this question using university staff, graduate students, and undergraduate students at a large university as subjects. Subjects were asked to evaluate a pilot episode for an upcoming TV show in a theater on campus and were given a cold 24-ounce bottle of water and a bag of granola from a respected campus rest aurant called The Spice Box. They were told to enjoy as much or as little of the granola as they wanted. Depending on the condition randomly assigned to the subjects, the granola was labeled as either "Regular Rocky Mountain Granola" or "Low-Fat Rocky Mountain Granola." Below this, the label indicated "Contains 1 Serving" or "Contains 2 Servings," or it provided no serving-size information. 32 Twenty subjects were assigned to each treatment, and their granola bags were weighed at the end of the session to determine how much granola was eaten. a. What are the factors and the treatments? How many subjects does the experiment require? b. Out line a completely randomized design for this experiment. (You need not actually do the randomization.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Factors: type of label, serving size info; 6 treatments; 120 subjects. b. Randomly assign subjects to 6 treatment groups.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Factors and Treatments

Factors are the variables that the experimenters manipulate. In this experiment, there are two factors: the labeling of the granola (`Regular` or `Low-Fat`) and the serving size information (`1 Serving`, `2 Servings`, or `No Serving Size Information`). Each combination of these factors forms a treatment. There are 2 (types of labeling) x 3 (types of serving size information) = 6 treatments in this experiment.
02

Calculate Required Subjects

Each of the 6 treatments receives 20 subjects. Therefore, the total number of subjects required for the experiment is the number of treatments multiplied by the number of subjects per treatment: 6 treatments x 20 subjects per treatment = 120 subjects.
03

Design the Completely Randomized Experiment

In a completely randomized design, subjects are randomly assigned to each of the treatments. This means each person has an equal chance of being placed in any of the 6 treatment groups. The randomization ensures that the results are not biased by how subjects are assigned to treatments, allowing for a fair comparison of effects across all treatment groups.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Factors and Treatments
In the realm of experimental design, **factors** and **treatments** are pivotal components. Factors refer to the different variables the experiment manipulates, while treatments are the specific conditions resulting from these manipulations.

For the experiment on low-fat food labels, two primary factors were identified: the type of granola label (either "Regular" or "Low-Fat") and the serving size information provided ("1 Serving," "2 Servings," or "No Serving Size Information").

This culminates in several unique combinations, forming the "treatments" in this study:
  • Regular with 1 Serving
  • Regular with 2 Servings
  • Regular with No Serving Size Information
  • Low-Fat with 1 Serving
  • Low-Fat with 2 Servings
  • Low-Fat with No Serving Size Information
By identifying these treatments, researchers can effectively measure and compare the effects of each variant on the participants' granola consumption.
Completely Randomized Design
In the field of experimental design, a **completely randomized design** is highly valued for its simplicity and effectiveness. This method involves randomly assigning subjects to different treatment groups, ensuring each subject has an equal chance of receiving any of the treatments.

In the context of the low-fat label experiment, this means that the 120 subjects were randomly distributed into the 6 treatment groups, with 20 subjects per group. The strength of this approach lies in its ability to eliminate biases in the assignment process, which can otherwise skew results and lead to incorrect conclusions.

Randomization also helps balance out differences among participants across all treatment groups, ensuring that any observed effects are truly due to the experimental treatments rather than extraneous variables.
Serving Size Information
**Serving size information** plays a crucial role in influencing consumers' perceptions and behavior. In the experiment, serving size information was manipulated to study its effect on the consumption of granola.

Participants received varying serving size labels - some saw "1 Serving," others "2 Servings," while a third group received no serving size information at all. By altering this information, researchers sought to determine whether knowing the portion size affects how much food participants would consume.

Another layer of complexity emerges when considering how serving size information interacts with other factors, such as the type of label (鈥淩egular鈥 vs. 鈥淟ow-Fat鈥), giving insights into how multiple factors may combine to affect decision-making and consumption.
Labeling Effects
The **labeling effects** are an interesting area of research in consumer psychology, often influencing how people perceive and consume products. In this experiment, granola was labeled as either "Regular" or "Low-Fat," allowing researchers to explore how these labels might affect consumption behaviors.

Labeling can lead to assumptions about the healthiness of a product. For example:
  • Low-fat labels might make consumers feel healthier choices are being made, potentially leading to higher consumption due to a misconception that it's acceptable to eat more.
  • Regular labels might not carry the same "healthy" connotation, which might restrain the amount consumed.
The study aims to observe these psychological reactions to food labeling, providing insight into how marketing and packaging can influence eating habits.
Experimental Subjects
**Experimental subjects** refer to the individuals participating in an experiment, whose responses are critical to understanding the outcomes of the study. In the low-fat granola labeling experiment, subjects consisted of university staff, graduate students, and undergraduate students at a large university.

These subjects are pivotal for several reasons:
  • Diversity in subjects - having both students and staff - provides a broad range of perspectives and eating behaviors, increasing the generalizability of the findings.
  • Random assignment of these subjects to treatment groups ensures a balanced distribution of characteristics across groups, reducing external biases.
Overall, the choice and handling of experimental subjects are critical steps, as they significantly impact the reliability and validity of the experimental results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Quitting Smoking and Risk for Type 2 Diabetes. Researchers studied a group of 10,892 middle-aged adults over a period of nine years. They found that smokers who quit had a higher risk of diabetes within three years of quitting than either nonsmokers or continuing smokers. \({ }^{4}\) Does this show that stopping smoking causes the short-term risk for Type 2 diabetes to increase? (Weight gain has been shown to be a major risk factor for developing Type 2 diabetes and is often a side effect of quitting smoking. Smokers also often quit due to health reasons.) Based on this research, should you tell a middle-aged adult who smokes that stopping smoking can cause diabetes and advise him or her to continue smoking? Carefully explain your answers to both questions.

More Education Improves Driving? Although traffic fatalities have been decreasing for years, this decrease has not been experienced equally in all segments of the population. In fact, although the overall rate of traffic fatalities has been decreasing, the rate has declined the most for those with more education and has actually gone up for those without high school degrees. A recent study shows that among those over 25, as education level increased from less than high school, to high school grad, to some college, to college grad, the rate of motor vehicle crash deaths decreased. \(\underline{2}\) a. What are the explanatory and response variables? b. Those with less education tend to drive cars that are older, have poorer crash test ratings, and have fewer safety features such as side airbags. Are the variables age of car, crash test rating, and presence of safety features explanatory variables, response variables, or lurking variables? Explain your reason. c. Is the association between traffic fatalities and education level good reason to think that a higher level of education actually causes an individual to be a safer driver? Explain why or why not.

Algal Blooms. Algal blooms have become a recurring problem on many American lakes. Among other things, they can cause damage to a person's liver, kidneys, and nervous system. Phosphorus runoff from farms is one factor that contributes to algal blooms. Will inserting fertilizer into soil rather than spreading it across the surface help reduce runoff? To study this, researchers compare the effects of these two methods of fertilizing fields on the amount of phosphorus in runoff. Specific features of a field, such as slope of the ground and nature of the soil, can affect runoff, so the researchers divide each of four fields into two plots of equal size in such a way that the runoff from each plot can be measured separately. They use a matched pairs design, with the two plots in the same field as the matched pairs. a. Draw a sketch of the four fields, displaying each as a rectangle. Divide each field (rectangle) in half, each half representing one of the two plots. Label the two plots for each field as Plot 1 and Plot \(2 .\) b. Do the randomization required by the matched pairs design. That is, randomly assign the two treatments to the two plots in each field. Mark on your sketch which treatment is used in each plot.

The Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation asked whether a community-wide advertising campaign would reduce smoking. The researchers located 11 pairs of communities, with each pair similar in location, size, economic status, and so on. One community in each pair was chosen at random to participate in the advertising campaign and the other was not. This is a. an observational study. b. a matched pairs experiment. c. a completely randomized experiment.

The Font Matters! In general, when trying to change your behavior, if the effort required is perceived as high, this will be an impediment to change, whether it is modifying your diet or your study habits. Researchers divided 40 students into two groups of 20 . The first group reads instructions for an exercise program printed in an easy-to-read font (Arial, 12 point), and the second group reads identical instructions in a difficult-to-read font (Brush, 12 point). Each subject estimates how many minutes the program will take and also uses a seven-point rating scale to report whether they are likely to include the exercise program as part of their daily routine ( 7 = very likely). The researchers hypothesized that those reading about the exercise program in the more difficult-toread font would estimate that the program would take longer and, they would be less likely to make the exercise program part of their regular routine. 3 Is this an experiment? Why or why not? What are the explanatory and response variables?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.