/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 Another Reason Not to Smoke? A r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Another Reason Not to Smoke? A research article reports that children at age five of women who smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day during pregnancy had IQs four points lower, on average, than children of nonsmokers. 12 Suggest some lurking variables that may help explain the association between smoking during pregnancy and children's later test scores. The association by itself is not good evidence that mothers' smoking causes lower scores.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Lurking variables include socioeconomic status, parental education, home environment, and healthcare access.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Scenario

Begin by understanding the main problem: The research shows that children of smoking mothers have lower IQ scores compared to children of non-smoking mothers. The question asks to identify lurking variables that could explain this association.
02

Identify Potential Lurking Variables

Lurking variables are hidden variables that may influence both the dependent and independent variables, thus creating an association between them. These variables are not directly measured in the study but may impact the results.
03

Socioeconomic Status

Consider the socioeconomic status (SES) of mothers. It is possible that mothers from lower SES backgrounds are both more likely to smoke and have less access to resources that improve their children's cognitive development.
04

Educational Background

The level of education of the mother might be another lurking variable. Mothers with lower educational attainment might smoke more and also have children with lower cognitive stimulation, which could affect children's IQ scores.
05

Parenting Styles and Home Environment

Parenting styles and the home environment provided by the mothers can also be lurking variables. Smokers may tend to provide different home environments and parenting styles which might affect children's cognitive development.
06

Access to Healthcare or Prenatal Care

Access to adequate prenatal care is another important factor. Mothers who smoke might also have less access to quality prenatal care, impacting the health and development of the child.
07

Conclusion

Summarize by noting that the identified lurking variables, such as socioeconomic status, education, parenting styles, and healthcare access, might contribute to the observed association but smoking itself is not definitively shown to cause lower IQ scores due to these confounding factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Socioeconomic Status
Socioeconomic status (SES) refers to an individual's or group's position within a hierarchical social structure. It is often measured by a combination of education, income, and occupation. SES can considerably influence various aspects of life, including health and education. In the context of expecting mothers, those from lower SES backgrounds may face numerous challenges and constraints that can indirectly affect their children's development.
For instance, limited financial resources can restrict access to quality healthcare, nutritious food, and educational materials—all of which are vital for early childhood development. Furthermore, low SES environments might expose children and parents to stressors like financial strain or unsafe living conditions.
Because these factors can materially affect a child's cognitive development, SES acts as a lurking variable that may contribute to the link between maternal smoking and lower IQ scores in children.
Educational Background
Educational background significantly influences family well-being and parenting practices. Mothers with higher educational attainment often have better knowledge about health and child development practices. They are typically more aware of the harmful effects of smoking during pregnancy and are more likely to refrain from it.
On the other hand, mothers with lower educational attainment may not have as much access to information or may not fully understand the long-term impacts of smoking. These mothers might also have fewer resources or opportunities for cognitive stimulation and enrichment activities for their children.
  • This lack of exposure and stimulation can potentially contribute to lower cognitive outcomes in children.
  • Because educational background shapes such a wide range of behaviors and attitudes, it can serve as another crucial lurking variable.
Parenting Styles
Parenting styles encompass the various approaches parents employ in raising their children. These styles can significantly influence a child's cognitive and emotional development. There are different parenting styles such as authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful, each carrying its outcomes for child development.
Mothers who smoke may tend to have different parenting practices compared to non-smoking mothers. For example, they might exhibit more stress or less emotional availability, which could affect the child's cognitive and emotional growth. Moreover, the home environment in families where smoking is prevalent might not provide the optimal stimuli necessary for boosting a child's cognitive abilities.
  • The variation in parenting styles and home environments serves as a lurking variable, influencing both the children's IQ scores and the initial relationship seen with maternal smoking.
Prenatal Care
Prenatal care is essential for monitoring the health and development of both the mother and her unborn child during pregnancy. Proper prenatal care involves regular check-ups, nutritional plans, and screenings for potential health issues; this ensures that fetal development is on track.
A lack of access to quality prenatal care can hinder these monitoring and preventive measures, potentially leading to complications that affect both the mother's and child's health. Women who smoke during pregnancy may also be less likely to seek or receive comprehensive prenatal care, due to various reasons related to lifestyle, economic, or educational barriers.
Thus, the absence of adequate prenatal care acts as an influential lurking variable, which might contribute to the observed discrepancies in children's IQ scores.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Fred keeps his savings in his mattress. He began with \(\$ 10,000\) from his mother and adds \(\$ 200\) each year. His total savings \(y\) after \(x\) years are given by the equation a. \(y=10,000+200 x\). b. \(y=200+10,000 x\). c. \(y=10,000+x\)

Regression to the Mean. We expect that students who do well on the midterm exam in a course will usually also do well on the final exam. Gary Smith of Pomona College looked at the exam scores of all 346 students who took his statistics class over a 10-year period. 27 The least-squares line for predicting final exam score from midterm-exam score was \(\hat{y}=46.6+0.41 x\). (Both exams have a 100 -point scale.) Octavio scores 10 points above the class mean on the midterm. How many points above the class mean do you predict that he will score on the final? (Hint: Use the fact that the least-squares line passes through the point \(x, y\) and the fact that Octavio's midterm score is \(x+10\).) This is another example of regression to the mean: st udents who do well on the midterm will, in general, do less well, but still above average, on the final.

Is Math the Key to Success in College? A College Board study of 15,941 high school graduates found a strong correlation between how much math minority students took in high school and their later success in college. News articles quoted the head of the College Board as saying that "math is the gatekeeper for success in college." Maybe so, but we should also think about lurking variables. What might lead minority students to take more or fewer high school math courses? Would these same factors influence success in college?

Regression to the Mean. Ejgure. \(4.9\) (page 116 ) displays the relationship between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2019 Masters Tournament. The least-squares line for predicting second-round scores \((y)\) from first-round scores \((x)\) has equation \(\hat{y}=62.91+0.164 x\). Find the predicted second-round scores for a player who shot 80 in the first round and for a player who shot 70 . The mean second-round score for all players was 75.02. So, a player who does well in the first round is predicted to do less well, but still better than average, in the second round. In addition, a player who does poorly in the first is predicted to do better, but still worse than average, in the second. (Comment: This is regression to the mean. If you select individuals with extreme scores on some measure, they tend to have less extreme scores when measured again. That's because their extreme position is partly merit and partly luck, and the luck will be different next time. Regression to the mean contributes to lots of "effects." The rookie of the year often doesn't do as well the next year; the best player in an orchestral audition may play less well once hired than the runners-up; a student who feels she needs coaching after taking the SAT often does better on the next try without coaching.)

SAT Scores. The correlation between mean \(2018 \mathrm{Math}\) SAT scores and mean 2018 ERW (Evidence-Based Reading and Writing) SAT scores for all 50 states and the District of Columbia is \(0.985\). Would you expect the correlation between the mean state SAT scores for these two tests to be lower, about the same, or higher than the correlation between the scores of individuals on these two tests? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.