/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Significant Does Not Mean Import... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Significant Does Not Mean Important. Never forget that even small effects can be statistically significant if the samples are large. To illustrate this fact, consider a sample of 148 small businesses. During a three-year period, 15 of the 106 businesses headed by men and seven of the 42 businesses headed by women failed. 22 a. Find the proportions of failures for businesses headed by women and businesses headed by men. These sample proportions are quite close to each other. Give the \(P\). value for the \(z\) test of the hypothesis that the same proportion of women's and men's businesses fail. (Use the two-sided alternative.) The test is very far from being significant. b. Now suppose that the same sample proportions came from a sample 30 times as large. That is, 210 out of 1260 businesses headed by women and 450 out of 3180 businesses headed by men fail. Verify that the proportions of failures are exactly the same as in part (a). Repeat the \(z\) test for the new data and show that it is now significant at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level. c. It is wise to use a confidence interval to estimate the size of an effect rather than just giving a P-value. Give the large sample \(95 \%\) confidence intervals for the difference between the proportions of women's and men's businesses that fail for the settings of both parts (a) and (b). What is the effect of larger samples on the confidence interval? Do you think the size of the difference between the proportions is an important difference? In responding to Exercises \(23.26\) through \(23.36\) follow the Plan, Solve, and Conclude steps of the four-step process.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Larger samples increase statistical significance but reveal small, potentially unimportant differences. Confidence intervals are narrower with larger samples.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Failure Proportions (Part a)

For businesses headed by men: - Total businesses: 106- Failed businesses: 15 - Proportion: \( p_{men} = \frac{15}{106} \approx 0.1415 \)For businesses headed by women: - Total businesses: 42- Failed businesses: 7 - Proportion: \( p_{women} = \frac{7}{42} \approx 0.1667 \)
02

Perform z-Test (Part a)

Calculate pooled proportion \( p \) for the two groups:\[ p = \frac{15+7}{106+42} = \frac{22}{148} \approx 0.1486 \]Calculate \( z \) statistic:\[ z = \frac{0.1667 - 0.1415}{\sqrt{0.1486 \cdot (1-0.1486) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{106} + \frac{1}{42}\right)}} \approx 0.547 \]Using a standard normal distribution table, the two-tailed p-value corresponding to \( z = 0.547 \) is not significant.
03

Verify Proportions for Larger Sample (Part b)

Verify the same proportions for a larger sample:For women: - Total businesses: 1260- Failed businesses: 210- Proportion: \( \frac{210}{1260} = 0.1667 \)For men: - Total businesses: 3180- Failed businesses: 450- Proportion: \( \frac{450}{3180} = 0.1415 \)The proportions match those from part (a).
04

Perform z-Test for Larger Sample (Part b)

Pooled proportion for the larger sample:\[ p = \frac{450+210}{3180+1260} = \frac{660}{4440} \approx 0.1486 \]Calculate \( z \) statistic for larger sample:\[ z = \frac{0.1667 - 0.1415}{\sqrt{0.1486 \cdot (1-0.1486) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3180} + \frac{1}{1260}\right)}} \approx 2.997 \]Using a standard normal distribution, the p-value is less than \( 0.05 \), indicating a significant difference.
05

Confidence Interval Calculation (Part c)

For part (a):Calculate standard error (SE):\[ SE_{a} = \sqrt{0.1486 \cdot (1-0.1486) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{106} + \frac{1}{42}\right)} \approx 0.0637 \]The confidence interval:\[ (0.1667 - 0.1415) \pm 1.96 \times 0.0637 \approx ( -0.067, 0.116) \]For part (b):Calculate standard error (SE):\[ SE_{b} = \sqrt{0.1486 \cdot (1-0.1486) \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3180} + \frac{1}{1260}\right)} \approx 0.0214 \]The confidence interval:\[ (0.1667 - 0.1415) \pm 1.96 \times 0.0214 \approx (0.004, 0.050) \]The larger sample size results in a narrower confidence interval.
06

Conclusion (Part c)

Larger sample sizes provide more precise estimates of effect size, as indicated by the narrower confidence interval in part (b). The actual difference in proportions remains small, suggesting that the difference may not be practically important.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

z-test
In statistics, a z-test is a powerful tool used to determine if there are significant differences between sample and population means. It compares the observed data with what the null hypothesis suggests. In our scenario, we want to see if the proportion of business failures led by men differs significantly from those led by women.
A z-test involves several key steps:
  • First, we calculate the sample proportions, which are the ratios of failed businesses to total businesses for each group.

  • Next, we compute the pooled proportion of failures for both groups combined. This step helps in standardizing the differences.

  • Then, we calculate the z-score using the difference between sample proportions and the standard error derived from the pooled proportion. The formula for the z-score is:\[z = \frac{\text{Observed Proportion Difference} - 0}{\text{Standard Error}}\]

  • Finally, by comparing this z-score against a standard distribution table, we obtain a p-value, which indicates how significant the observed differences are.
In the exercise above, the z-test performed with the initial smaller sample size wasn't significant, but when the sample size increased dramatically, the z-test showed statistical significance.
confidence interval
Confidence intervals give us a range of values that can estimate the true population parameter. They are particularly useful when you want to understand how certain you can be about your sample results.
A 95% confidence interval tells us that, if we were to take 100 different samples and compute confidence intervals for each, about 95 of those intervals would contain the true population proportion.
To create a confidence interval around the difference in proportions of business failures:
  • The standard error for the difference in proportions is computed using the pooled proportion from both groups.

  • The margin of error is then estimated by multiplying this standard error with the z-score that corresponds to the desired confidence level, often 1.96 for 95% confidence.

  • The confidence interval itself is calculated as the observed difference in sample proportions plus or minus this margin of error. \[CI = (\text{Proportion Difference}) \pm (z \times SE)\]
With a larger sample size, the confidence interval becomes narrower, indicating a more precise estimate. Despite the precision, the actual practical significance of the difference in this scenario remains a debate.
sample size effect
The size of your sample can greatly influence the outcome of statistical tests, such as the z-test. With bigger samples, we tend to see more reliable estimates and often higher statistical significance. This is due to the reduction of variability and the ability to detect even small differences.
In the given exercise, when we increased the sample size by 30 times, from 148 to 4440 businesses, the previously non-significant z-test became significant.
Key impacts of sample size include:
  • **Precision:** Larger sample sizes lead to more precise estimates, which shrink the standard error and result in narrower confidence intervals. This precision can help determine effects more accurately.

  • **Power:** The ability of a test to detect differences (its power) increases with larger sample sizes, meaning smaller differences might become statistically significant.

  • **Significance Testing:** A difference might be statistically significant in a large sample, but it doesn't always mean the difference is practically significant.
While larger sample sizes lend greater statistical power, it's essential to interpret the significance in the context of practical application. Even if the statistics suggest significance, real-world implications must always be considered.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Are They Tracking Me? A survey in 2019 asked a random sample of U.S. adults if they believed the government was tracking all or most of their activities online or on their cell phones. Of the 671 adults aged 18-29, 396 said "yes." Of the 977 adults aged 65 or older, 293 said "yes." 17 a. Do these samples satisfy the guidelines for the largesample confidence interval? b. Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of adults aged 18-29 and adults aged 65 or older who believed the government was tracking all or most of their activities online or on their cell phones.

Smoking among Seniors. Since the 1990 s, daily cigarette smoking among high school seniors has dropped from around \(12 \%\) to slightly over \(3 \%\). In 2017, random samples of 1725 female and 1564 male high school seniors found that \(3.7 \%\) of the females and \(3.1 \%\) of the males had smoked cigarettes daily in the 30 days before the survey. \(\underline{2}\) Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of the populations of male and female high school seniors who had smoked cigarettes daily in the 30 days before the survey. Follow the four-step process as illustrated in Examples \(23.2\) and \(23.3\) (pages 518 and 520 ).

(Optional Topic) Lyme Disease. Lyme disease is spread in the northeastern United States by infected ticks. The ticks are infected mainly by feeding on mice, so more mice result in more infected ticks. The mouse population rises and falls with the abundance of acorns, their favored food. Experimenters studied two similar forest areas in a year when the acorn crop failed. They added hundreds of thousands of acorns to one area to imitate an abundant acorn crop, while leaving the other area untouched. The next spring, 54 of the 72 mice trapped in the first area were in breeding condition, versus 10 of the 17 mice trapped in the second area. 27 Estimate the difference between the proportions of mice ready to breed in good acorn years and bad acorn years. (Use \(90 \%\) confidence. Be sure to justify your choice of confidence interval.)

I'll Stop Smoking-Soon! Chantix is different from most other quit-smoking products in that it targets nicotine receptors in the brain, attaches to them, and blocks nicotine from reaching them. A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled clinical trial on Chantix was conducted with a 24week treatment period. Participants in the study were cigarette smokers who were either unwilling or unable to quit smoking in the next month but were willing to reduce their smoking and make an attempt to quit within the next three months. Subjects received either Chantix or a placebo for 24 weeks, with a target of reducing the number of cigarettes smoked by \(50 \%\) or more by week \(4,75 \%\) or more by week 8 , and a quit attempt by 12 weeks. The primary outcome measured was continuous abstinence from smoking during weeks 15 through 24. Of the 760 subjects taking Chantix, 244 abstained from smoking during weeks 15 through 24 , whereas 52 of the 750 subjects taking the placebo abstained during this same time period. 24 a. Give a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference (treatment minus placebo) in the proportions of smokers who would abstain from smoking during weeks 15 through 24 . b. Pfizer, the company that manufactures Chantix, claims that Chatix is proven to help smokers quit. Does your confidence interval support this claim? Discuss.

Aerosolized Vaccine for Measles. An aerosolized vaccine for measles was developed in Mexico and has been used on more than 4 million children since 1980 . Aerosolized vaccines have the advantages of being able to be administered by people without clinical training and do not cause injectionassociated infections. Despite these advantages, data about efficacy of the aerosolized vaccines against measles compared to subcutaneous injection of the vaccine have been inconsistent. Because of this, a large randomized controlled study was conducted using children in India. The primary outcome was an immune response to measles measured 91 days after the treatments. Among the 785 children receiving the subcutaneous injection, 743 developed an immune response, while among the 775 children receiving the aerosolized vaccine, 662 developed an immune response. 3 a. Compute the proportion of subjects experiencing the primary outcome for both the aerosol and injection groups. b. Can we safely use the large-sample confidence interval for comparing the proportion of children who developed an immune response to measles in the aerosol and injection groups? Explain. c. Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of children in the aerosol and injection groups who experienced the primary outcome. d. The study described is an example of a noninferiority clinical trial intended to show that the effect of a new treatment, the aerosolized vaccine, is not worse than that of the standard treatment by more than a specified margin. 4 Specifically, is the percentage of children who developed an immune response for the aerosol treatment more than \(5 \%\) below the percentage for the subcutaneous injected vaccine? The 5percentage-point difference was based on previous studies and the fact that with a bigger difference, the aerosolized vaccine would not provide the levels of protection necessary to achieve herd immunity. Using your answer in part (c), do you feel the investigators demonstrated the noninferiority of the aerosolized vaccine? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.