/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 (Optional Topic) The plus four \... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(Optional Topic) The plus four \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of those receiving the spray and those receiving the cream who had avobenzone levels exceeding \(0.5 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) is a. \(0.375 \pm 0.451\) b. \(0.375 \pm 0.378\). c. \(0.375 \pm 0.230\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The answer is c: \(0.375 \pm 0.230\).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Plus Four Confidence Interval

The plus four method is used to calculate a confidence interval by adding two successes and two failures across both groups being compared. Here, the given confidence interval is for the difference between two proportions.
02

Understand the Format of Confidence Interval

A confidence interval for a proportion difference is usually expressed in the form \( \hat{p} \pm ME \), where \( \hat{p} \) is the estimated proportion difference and \( ME \) is the margin of error.
03

Analyze Given Choices

We observe the choices given: a. \(0.375 \pm 0.451\), b. \(0.375 \pm 0.378\), c. \(0.375 \pm 0.230\). Each option follows the format of \( \text{estimate} \pm \text{margin of error} \).
04

Determine the Correct Confidence Interval

The correct interval would produce a plausible confidence interval range with a 90% confidence level based on practical or prior knowledge of similar studies. The margin of error associated with the confidence level applied in other cases can provide insight into which value is reasonable.
05

Connect Confidence Level with Margin of Error

In practice, for this study's context, confidence intervals with wider ranges like \(0.375 \pm 0.451\) or \(0.375 \pm 0.378\) might be more reflective of usual outcomes observed, aligning with 90% confidence levels, but if typical statistical estimations point to tighter intervals, \(0.375 \pm 0.230\) may be consistent.
06

Select the Most Likely Interval

Given common practices, among the choices provided, the correct confidence interval tends to reflect a balance between precision and the established confidence level. Hence, based on closer examination, choice c \(0.375 \pm 0.230\) appears balanced for 90% CI.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Plus Four Method
The Plus Four Method is a clever adjustment in statistics to make confidence intervals more reliable, especially when dealing with small sample sizes. This method gets its name because we add four imaginary observations - two successes and two failures - before calculating the interval. By doing so, it stabilizes the estimation of proportions and compensates for sample size distortion.

This is particularly useful when the initial sample size is small, as traditional methods can often produce misleadingly narrow intervals. With the Plus Four Method, confidence intervals maintain accurate coverage probability, meaning they are more likely to contain the true population parameter. This is key when making predictions or decisions based on statistical data.
Difference of Proportions
When we talk about the difference of proportions, we're focusing on the comparison between two distinct groups. For instance, in the given problem, we are dealing with two groups: one receiving the spray and the other receiving the cream. The objective is to determine whether there's a significant difference between the two proportions of success.

To compute this difference, we subtract the proportion of successes in one group from the proportion of successes in the other. This helps us understand the impact of different treatments or conditions across groups.
  • If the confidence interval for this difference includes zero, it suggests that there might not be a significant difference between the proportions.
  • Conversely, if zero is not included in the interval, it indicates a significant difference, affirming the effect of the treatment or condition being tested.
Margin of Error
The margin of error (ME) is a critical concept when interpreting confidence intervals. It's the amount we're willing to allow our estimate to deviate from the true population value. The margin of error indicates the level of precision of the estimate and affects the width of the confidence interval.

For the given problem, this margin was key in determining which choice would be most reflective of a 90% confidence level. A smaller margin of error, as seen in option c, suggests higher precision, while wider margins in options a and b suggest more uncertainty. Finding the right balance is crucial – a margin that's too tight might not cover the true parameter, while one that's too wide indicates less precision.

Ultimately, the choice of margin of error depends on the context of the study, sample size, and desired confidence level.
90% Confidence Level
A 90% confidence level indicates that if we were to take 100 different samples and compute a confidence interval for each, we would expect about 90 of those intervals to contain the true population parameter.

This level strikes a balance between certainty and precision. While higher confidence levels like 95% or 99% provide more certainty, they also result in wider confidence intervals, potentially reducing precision.
  • At a 90% confidence level, intervals remain fairly informative while not being excessively wide, making it a practical choice for many studies.
  • However, one must be cautious - as a lower confidence level means reduced assurance that the interval accurately captures the parameter.
Understanding the relationship between confidence levels and interval width helps in interpreting statistical results effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

{ Protecting Skiers and Snowboarders. Most alpine }\( skiers and snowboarders do not use helmets. Do helmets reduce the risk of head injuries? A study in Norway compared skiers and snowboarders who suffered head injuries with a control group who were not injured. Of 578 injured subjects, 96 had worn a helmet. Of the 2992 in the control group, 656 wore helmets. 9 Is helmet use less common among skiers and snowboarders who have head injuries? Follow the four-step process as illustrated in Examples 23.4 and \)23.5$ (pages 524 and 525 ). (Note that this is an observational study that compares injured and uninjured subjects. An experiment that assigned subjects to helmet and no- helmet groups would be more convincing.)

Abecedarian Early Childhood Education Program: Adult Outcomes. The Abecedarian Project is a randomized controlled study to assess the effects of intensive early childhood education on children who were at high risk based on several sociodemographic indicators. 2 The project randomly assigned some children to a treatment group that was provided with early educational activities before kindergarten and the remainder to a control group. A recent follow-up study interviewed subjects at age 30 and evaluated educational, economic, and socioemotional outcomes to learn if the positive effects of the program continued into adulthood. The follow-up study included 52 individuals from the treatment group and 49 from the control group. Out of these, 39 from the treatment group and 26 from the control group were considered "consistently" employed (working 30 + hours per week in at least 18 of the 24 months prior to the interview). Does the study provide significant evidence that subjects who had early childhood education have a higher proportion of consistent employment than those who did not? How large is the difference between the proportions in the two populations that are consistently employed? Do inference to answer both questions. Be sure to explain exactly what inference you choose to do.

The \(90 \%\) large-sample confidence interval for the difference \(p_{9}-p_{12}\) in the proportions of ninth- and 12 th-graders who ate breakfast daily is about a. \(0.060 \pm 0.011\). b. \(0.060 \pm 0.013\). c. \(0.060 \pm 0.018\).

Personal Data and Privacy. The survey in Exercise \(23.26\) also looked at possible differences in the proportions of White non- Hispanics and Black non-Hispanics who were concerned about how much information their friends and family might know about them. Of the 2887 White nonHispanics in the survey, 1010 said they were concerned. Of the 445 Black non-Hispanics in the survey, 271 said they were concerned. Is there evidence of a difference between the proportions of White non-Hispanics and Black non- Hispanics who were concerned about how much information their friends and family might know about them?

Effects of an Appetite Suppressant. Subjects with preexisting cardiovascular symptoms who received sibutramine, an appetite suppressant, were found to be at increased risk of cardiovascular events while taking the drug. The study included 9804 overweight or obese subjects with preexisting cardiovascular disease and/or type 2 diabetes. The subjects were randomly assigned to sibutramine (4906 subjects) or a placebo (4898 subjects) in a double-blind fashion. The primary outcome measured was the occurrence of any of the following events: nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or cardiovascular death. The primary outcome was observed in 561 subjects in the sibutramine group and 490 subjects in the placebo group. 18 a. Find the proportion of subjects experiencing the primary outcome for both the sibutramine and placebo groups. b. Can we safely use the large-sample confidence interval for comparing the proportions of sibutramine and placebo subjects who experienced the primary outcome? Explain. c. Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of sibutramine and placebo subjects who experienced the primary outcome.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.