/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 35 5% Versus 1\%. Sketch the standa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

5% Versus 1\%. Sketch the standard Normal curve for the \(z\) test statistic and mark off areas under the curve to show why a value of \(z\) that is statistically significant at the \(1 \%\) level in a one-sided test is always statistically significant at the \(5 \%\) level. If \(z\) is statistically significant at the \(5 \%\) level, what can you say about its significance at the \(1 \%\) level?

Short Answer

Expert verified
A z score significant at 5% isn't always significant at 1%; it must exceed 2.33 to be significant at both levels.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We are asked to consider two significance levels: 5% and 1%, and we need to determine when a test statistic is significant at these levels for a one-sided test.
02

Define the Critical Values

For a one-sided test with a normal distribution, the critical value for a 5% significance level is approximately 1.645, and for a 1% significance level, it is approximately 2.33.
03

Draw the Normal Distribution Curve

Sketch a standard normal distribution curve. Mark the critical value for 5% at 1.645 on the z-axis, representing the point beyond which the area under the curve is 5%. Also mark the critical value for 1% at 2.33, which is further to the right.
04

Identify the Areas Under the Curve

Shade the area to the right of 1.645 as the rejection region for the 5% significance level. Shade the area to the right of 2.33 as the rejection region for the 1% significance level. Note that the 1% region is within the 5% region.
05

Interpret the Sketch

A z score that lies beyond 2.33 is statistically significant at the 1% level as it falls within this rejection zone. Any z score beyond 1.645 but less than 2.33 is significant at the 5% level but not at the 1% level. Any z greater than 2.33 is significant at both levels.
06

Conclusion

If a z score is significant at the 5% level, it is beyond 1.645, but to be significant at the 1% level, it must be beyond 2.33. Thus, a score significant at 5% might not be significant at 1%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Normal Distribution
Normal distribution is a key concept in statistics that helps us understand how data is spread around a mean (average) value. Often characterized by its familiar bell-shaped curve, the normal distribution describes how the frequency of data points decreases the further they are from the mean. This distribution is symmetric, meaning the left side of the curve is a mirror image of the right.
  • The highest point of the curve represents the mean, median, and mode of the dataset.
  • Data points are most frequent around this central peak.
  • The standard deviation measures the spread of the data around the mean; the wider the spread, the flatter the curve.
The normal distribution is fundamental in statistical hypothesis testing, allowing us to determine probabilities and make inferences about population parameters. When you conduct a statistical test, like the z-test mentioned in the exercise, you're often assuming your data follows a normal distribution.
Critical Values
Critical values are crucial in hypothesis testing as they define the boundaries of the acceptance and rejection regions. When you conduct a z-test, critical values help decide whether your test statistics are significant.
  • For a one-sided test, there is one critical value set based on your chosen significance level.
  • At the 5% significance level for a normal distribution, the critical z-score is usually around 1.645.
  • At the more stringent 1% level, the critical z-score increases to approximately 2.33.
These values indicate the point beyond which the null hypothesis can be rejected. If your calculated test statistic exceeds a critical value, your results are considered statistically significant at that level.
Significance Levels
Significance levels are a foundational concept in hypothesis testing that determine the risk you take in rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. Commonly denoted by the Greek letter alpha (\( \alpha \)), significance levels form the probability of committing a Type I error.
  • A 5% significance level (\( \alpha = 0.05 \)) means you'd expect to reject the null hypothesis erroneously 5 times out of 100 trials.
  • A more conservative 1% level (\( \alpha = 0.01 \)) reduces this expectation to 1 out of 100.
Testing at lower significance levels requires more substantial evidence against the null hypothesis to reach significance. A z-score significant at 5% might not meet the stricter standard at 1%. Lowering the significance level thus increases confidence in your test results but also increases the likelihood of a Type II error, where you might not detect an effect when there is one.
One-sided Test
In statistical hypothesis testing, deciding between one-sided and two-sided tests is critical for correctly interpreting results. A one-sided test examines whether a test statistic is significantly greater or less than a certain value. It's useful when you have a specific direction in your hypothesis.
  • One-sided tests have more "power" to detect an effect in one direction, meaning a smaller critical value leads to the rejection region arriving sooner.
  • In the context of the normal distribution curve, this means focusing solely on one tail – either the left or the right, depending on your hypothesis.
For example, if you only want to test if something is greater than a known value, you'd use a one-sided test. This type of test simplifies the hypothesis check, but it's important to ensure that the directional hypothesis aligns with the context of your research to avoid incorrect conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How to Show That You Are Rich. Every society has its own marks of wealth and prestige. In ancient China, it appears that owning pigs was such a mark. Evidence comes from examining burial sites. The skulls of sacrificed pigs tend to appear along with expensive ornaments, which suggests that the pigs, like the ornaments, signal the wealth and prestige of the person buried. A study of burials from around 3500 ?.C. concluded that "there are striking differences in grave goods between burials with pig skulls and burials without them .... A test indicates that the two samples of total artifacts are statistically significantly different at the \(0.01\) level." 2 Explain clearly why "statistically significantly different at the \(0.01\) level" gives good reason to think that there really is a systematic difference between burials that contain pig skulls and those that lack them.

Alleviating Test Anxiety. Research suggest s that pressure to perform well can reduce performance on exams. Are there effective strategies to deal with pressure? In an experiment, researchers had students take a test on mathematical skills. The same st udents were then asked to take a second test on the same skills. However, for the second test, the researchers added conditions intended to increase the pressure to perform well. Now each student was paired with a partner, and only if both improved their scores would they receive a monetary reward for participating in the experiment. They were also told that their performance would be videot aped and watched by teachers and students. Students were then randomly divided into two groups. One group served as a control. To help them cope with the pressure, 10 minutes before the second exam, students in the second group were asked to write as candidly as possible about their thoughts and feelings regarding the exam. The difference in the test scores (posttest - pretest score) was computed. "Students who expressed their thoughts before the second high-pressure test showed a statistically significant \(5 \%\) math accuracy improvement from the pretest to posttest" \((P<0.03)\). 10 A colleague who knows no statistics says that an increase of \(5 \%\) isn't a lot-and maybe it's just an accident due to natural variation among the students. Explain in simple language how " \(P<0.03^{"}\) answers this objection.

Th This What P Means? A randomized comparative experiment examined the effect of the attractiveness of an instructor on the performance of students on a quiz given by the instructor. The researchers found a statistically significant difference in quiz scores between students in a class with an instructor rated as attractive and students in a class with an instructor rated as unattractive \((P=0.005) . .^{\circ}\) When asked to explain the meaning of " \(P=0.005\)," a student says, "This means there is only probability of \(0.005\) that the null hypot hesis is true." Explain what \(P=0.005\) really means in a way that makes it clear that the student's explanation is wrong.

The \(z\) statistic for a one-sided test is \(z=1.62\). This test is a. not statistically significant at either \(\alpha=0.05\) or \(\alpha=0.01\). b. statistically significant at \(\alpha=0.05\) but not at \(\alpha=0.01\). c. stat istically significant at both \(\alpha=0.05\) and \(\alpha=0.01\).

Researchers investigated the effectiveness of oral zinc, as compared to a placebo, in reducing the duration of the common cold when taken within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms. The researchers found that those taking oral zinc had a statistically significantly shorter duration \((P<0.05)\) than those taking the placebo. \(-\) This means that a. the probability that the null hypothesis is true is less than \(0.05\). b. the value of the test statistic, the mean reduction in duration of the cold, is large. c. neither of the above is true.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.