/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 (Optional topic) The purpose of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 11: Problem 17

(Optional topic) The purpose of informed consent is a. to obtain a signature from a study subject in order to protect the investigator, the study staff, and the institution. b. to obtain a signature from a study subject in order to document his or her agreement to participate in research. c. to provide a potential subject with appropriate information in an appropriate manner and allow that person to make an informed decision about participation in research.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (c) is correct.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Key Elements of Each Option

Read and analyze each statement provided in the options. Option (a) suggests informed consent is about obtaining a signature to protect the research team and institution. Option (b) focuses on obtaining a signature for documenting a participant's agreement. Option (c) emphasizes providing information so that the participant can make an informed decision.
02

Understand the Purpose of Informed Consent

Informed consent is a process where researchers provide potential participants with all the necessary information about the study, including its purpose, risks, benefits, and procedures. The goal is to enable participants to make an informed decision about whether or not to partake in the study.
03

Evaluate Each Option Against the Informed Consent Purpose

Compare each option to the understood purpose of informed consent. Option (a) focuses on the protection of the investigator and others but doesn't aim toward informing participants. Option (b) deals with documentation, but not the process of informing the subject. Option (c) aligns with the purpose by focusing on providing information for informed decision-making.
04

Select the Most Accurate Option

Based on the comparisons, option (c) directly addresses the true purpose of informed consent, which is about providing the necessary information so participants can make an informed decision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Research Ethics
Research ethics are crucial principles that guide the behavior and decision-making processes of researchers. These ethics ensure that studies are conducted in a way that respects the rights and dignity of participants. Central to research ethics is the principle of obtaining informed consent from participants.
Informed consent means that participants are fully educated about the research before agreeing to take part. This includes details about the study's purpose, methodology, potential risks, and anticipated benefits. By ensuring informed consent is obtained, researchers uphold integrity and respect participants' autonomy.
Research ethics also involve valuing honesty and transparency in reporting research methods and findings. This allows results to be meaningful and reproducible. Ethical studies protect the welfare of participants and contribute to the wider acceptance and trust in scientific research.
  • Sabotaging data for personal gain is unethical.
  • Disregarding participant consent can harm the study's credibility.
  • Following ethical guidelines preserves the integrity of research.
Participant Rights
Participants in research studies possess fundamental rights that need to be safeguarded by researchers. These rights help ensure that participants' welfare is prioritized throughout the research process.
One of the main rights is the right to be informed. Participants should receive a comprehensive explanation of what the study entails, including any potential risks and benefits. This is part of informed consent and enables them to decide freely whether to join or not.
Participants also have the right to withdraw from the study at any time without facing any penalty or loss of benefits. This ensures their autonomy and freedom are respected.
  • Participants must be made aware of their right to confidentiality.
  • Respecting participant rights promotes ethical research practices.
  • Ensuring participant safety is a top priority.
Study Protocols
Study protocols are detailed plans that define every aspect of a research study. They outline how a study will be conducted and provide a framework for researchers to follow, ensuring consistency and validity.
Protocols include information on the study's objective, methodology, eligibility criteria, and data analysis strategies. They serve as a guide for researchers to conduct the study systematically, maintaining ethical and scientific standards.
A well-crafted study protocol ensures that all researchers understand and implement the study's processes uniformly. This reduces variability and errors, leading to reliable results.
  • Protocols help in identifying potential risks beforehand.
  • They ensure that each participant has the same experience.
  • Amendments to protocols must be documented clearly.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

.In July 2018, C-SPAN ran a poll on Twitter that asked, "Do you SUPPORT or OPPOSE the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court?" The final result was \(54 \%\) SUPPORT, \(39 \%\) OPPOSE, and 7\% UNDECIDED. The number of votes received was 42,145 . Explain why these sample results are almost certainly biased.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have serious long-term consequences, including psychiatric disorders. To determine if there is a relationship between TBI and the risk of suicide, researchers examined the medical records of \(7,418,391\) individuals living in Denmark from 1980 to 2014. The researchers found that suicide rates were statistically significantly higher in those individuals who had medical contact for TBI compared to those with no evidence of TBI. However, the medical records did not contain information about TBI suffered prior to 1977 , nor did the records indicate what treatment patients with TBI received. 2 This is an example of a. an observational study. b. a randomized comparative experiment. c. a block design, with blocks being whether or not there was information prior to \(1977 .\)

Many polling organizations conduct surveys about public opinion concerning the death penalty on a regular basis. Here are the questions asked in two polls conducted in \(2018 .\) Question A: Which punishment do you prefer for people convicted of murder: the death penalty or life in prison with no chance of parole? Question B: Are you in favor of the death penalty for a person convicted of murder? One of these questions drew \(56 \%\) favoring/preferring the death penalty. The other drew only \(37 \%\). Which wording pulls respondents favoring/preferring the death penalty? Why? Reactions to Simulated News Reports. A sample of University of Colorado students each viewed one of two simulated news reports about a terrorist bombing against the United States by a fictitious country. One report showed the bombing attack on a military target and the other on a cultural/educational site. In addition, before viewing the news report, each student read one of two "primes." The first was a prime for forgiveness based on the biblical saying "Love thy enemy," and the second was a retaliatory prime based on the biblical saying "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." After viewing the news report, the students were asked to rate on a scale of 1 to 12 what the U.S. reaction should be, with the lowest score (1) corresponding to the United States sending a special amba.ssador to the country and the highest score (12) corresponding to an all-out nuclear attack against the country. Use this information to answer Quertions \(11.11\) and \(11.12 .\)

Do You Trust the Internet? You want to ask a sample of college students, "How much do you trust information about politics that you find on the Internet-a great deal, somewhat, not much, or not at all?" You try out this and other questions on a pilot group of five students chosen from your class. The class members are \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline Allenby & Drake & Kelbick & Rumsey \\ \hline Bach & Ding & Kim & Scott \\ \hline Baker & Drake & Lee & Smith \\ \hline Chen & Farmer & Linder & Stewart \\ \hline Collins & Hans & Miner & Verducci \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Describe how you will label the students to select the sample. b. Use the Simple Random Sample applet, other software, or Table B, beginning at line 122 , to select the five students in the sample. c. What is the response variable in this study?

Typeface Naturalness and Perceived Healthiness. Can the typeface used on a packaged product affect our perception of the product's healthiness? It was hypothesized that use of a "natural" typeface, which looks more handwritten and tends to be more slanted and curved, would lead to a higher perception of product healthiness than an unnatural typeface. Two typefaces, Impact and Sketchflow Print, were used. These typefaces had been shown in a previous study to differ in their perceived nat uralness, but otherwise they were rated similarly on factors such as readability and likability. Images of two identical packages differing only in the typeface used were presented to the subjects. Participants read statements such as "This product is healthy natural/wholesome/organic," and they rated how much they agreed with the statement on a seven-point scale from \(1=\) strong agreement to \(7=\) strong disagreement. The subjects' responses were combined to create a perceived healthiness score. \(\underline{7}\) The researcher had 100 students available to serve as subjects. a. What are the response and explanatory variables? b. Describe the design of a completely randomized experiment to learn the effect of typeface naturalness on perceived healthiness. c. Describe the design of a matched pairs experiment using the same 100 subjects.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.