/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 40 Store window creativity and shop... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Store window creativity and shopper behavior. Do more creative storewindow displays affect shopper behavior? Six main-street retailers selling everyday fashion items were used in the study. Pretests with shoppers showed the six stores to be comparable on brands and consumer perceptions of value for the money. Three of the retailers had more creative windows in terms of displaying items in a more innovative and artistic manner versus the less creative windows, which had a more concrete focus on the items on display. All display windows were of similar dimensions. Observers, in close proximity but out of sight of shoppers, watched their behavior as they passed the display windows, and for each shopper it was recorded whether they looked at the window or entered the store. A total of 863 shoppers passed the more creative windows and 971 passed the less creative windows. The study found that a higher percentage of shoppers looked at and entered the stores with the more creative windows, with the differences in shoppers" behavior between the more/less creative windows being statistically significant. 32 (a) Is this an observational study or an experiment? What are the explanatory and response variables? (b) Explain what statistical significance means in describing the outcome of this study. (c) Despite the results being statistically significant, the authors state:

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Observational study. Explanatory: window type; Response: shopper behavior. (b) Statistical significance means the results are unlikely due to chance.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Type of Study

To identify if it's an observational study or an experiment, consider whether the researchers intervened to assign the subjects to different conditions. Since the researchers observed existing conditions without manipulation, this is an observational study.
02

Identify Explanatory and Response Variables

The explanatory variable is the type of store window (creative vs. less creative), while the response variable is the shopper's behavior (whether they looked at the window or entered the store). These are the two primary variables the study focuses on to assess the effect of window creativity on behavior.
03

Define Statistical Significance

Statistical significance refers to the likelihood that the observed differences in shopper behavior between the two types of windows were not due to chance. It suggests that the creative window displays genuinely influenced shopper behavior, as supported by a statistical test showing a significant difference in percentages.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
In the realm of statistics, distinguishing between an observational study and an experiment is crucial to understanding research methodology. An observational study is defined by its lack of manipulation. Researchers observe subjects in their natural environment without interfering with the variables or conditions. In the exercise at hand, the researchers did not alter the store windows or assign different conditions to the shoppers.

Instead, they simply observed the existing variation in window creativity. This means no artificial scenarios were created; they merely watched and recorded natural shopper behavior as it unfolded. Observational studies can offer valuable insights because they reflect real-world settings, however, they might also be limited in explaining cause-and-effect relationships since other variables could influence the outcomes.
  • No manipulation of conditions
  • Observes natural behavior
  • Highlights potential variables in action
Explanatory Variables
Explanatory variables, sometimes known as independent variables, are essentially the inputs or factors that the researcher believes may have an impact on the response variables. In the study about store window creativity, the explanatory variable is the type of store window presentation.

Here, two distinct conditions are observed: creative vs. less creative window displays. The research task is to see how these different types of windows might influence or explain changes in shopper behavior. By identifying this variable, researchers can begin to understand how variations in store window presentation might affect consumer decisions.
  • Defined as the variables believed to influence outcomes
  • In this study, it is the type of window display
  • Critical for analyzing the cause of changes
Response Variables
Response variables are elements within a study that researchers measure to determine the effects of changes in the explanatory variables. They are essentially the outcomes of interest that might be influenced by other variables. In the context of our store window study, the response variable is shopper behavior, particularly their likelihood of looking at the display or entering the store.

By measuring these behaviors, the researchers aim to quantify the influence of window creativity. This information helps answer whether creative store displays genuinely impact consumer behavior, acting as a reflection of any shifts prompted by changes in the explanatory variable.
  • Outcomes influenced by the explanatory variable
  • In this study, includes whether shoppers looked at or entered the store
  • Essential for understanding the impact of the cause
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a fundamental concept in statistics that describes whether the results of a study are likely due to chance or if they reflect genuine effects or differences. In our study of store window creativity, statistical significance is used to affirm that the observed differences in shopper behavior between the creative and less creative windows are not just random occurrences.

This is achieved through statistical tests that measure the probability of the observed results happening if there was actually no effect present. When results are statistically significant, it gives confidence that there is a real impact on behavior tied to the variable in question, in this case, the influence of window creativity.
  • Determines if results are due to chance or a true effect
  • Essential for confirming genuine differences
  • Provides statistical confidence in the study outcome

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation asked whether a communitywide advertising campaign would reduce smoking. The researchers located 11 pairs of communities, with each pair similar in location, size, economic status, and so on. One community in each pair was chosen at random to participate in the advertising campaign and the other was not. This is (a) an observational study. (b) a matched pairs experiment. (c) a completely randomized experiment.

Shared Pain and Bonding. Although painful experiences are involved in social rituals in many parts of the world, little is known about the social effects of pain. Will sharing painful experiences in a small group lead to greater bonding of group members than sharing a similar nonpainful experience? Fifty- four university students in South Wales were divided at random into a pain group containing 27 students, with the remaining students in the no-pain group. Pain was induced by two tasks. In the first task, students submerged their hands in freezing water for as long as possible moving metal balls at the bottom of the vessel into a submerged container; in the second task, students performed a standing wall squat with back straight and knees at 90 degrees for as long as possible. The no-pain group completed the first task using room temperature water for 90 seconds and the second task by balancing on one foot for 60 seconds, changing feet if necessary. In both the pain and no-pain settings, the students completed the tasks in small groups, which typically consisted of four students and contained similar levels of group interaction. Afterward, each student completed a questionnaire to create a bonding score based on answers to questions such as "I feel the participants in this study have a lot in common," or \({ }^{*}\) I feel I can trust the other participants."11 (a) Outline the design of the experiment, following the model of Figure 9.4. (b) Explain how you will randomly assign the subjects at random to the two groups, and then carry out this randomization using software, the Simple Random Sample applet, or Table B beginning at line 125 . (c) Why do you think the experimenter had students in the no-pain group complete similar pain-free tasks in small groups? Do you think this is important for the type of conclusion that can be reached? Explain.

What electrical changes occur in muscles as they get tired? Student subjects hold their arms above their shoulders until they have to drop them. Meanwhile, the electrical activity in their arm muscles is measured. This is (a) an observational study. (b) an uncontrolled experiment. (c) a randomized comparative experiment.

Growing trees faster. The concentration of carbon dioxide \(\left(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\right)\) in the atmosphere is increasing rapidly due to our use of fossil fuels. Because green plants use \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) to fuel photosynthesis, more \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) may cause trees to grow faster. An elaborate apparatus allows researchers to pipe extra \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) to a 30 -meter circle of forest. We want to compare the growth in base area of trees in treated and untreated areas to see if extra \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) does, in fact, increase growth. We can afford to treat three circular areas. 35 (a) Describe the design of a completely randomized experiment using six well- separated, 30 -meter circular areas in a pine forest. Sketch the circles, and carry out the randomization your design calls for. (b) Areas within the forest may differ in soil fertility. Describe a matched pairs design using three pairs of circles that will reduce the extra variation due to different fertility. Sketch the circles and carry out the randomization your design calls for.

Cell Phones and Driving. Does talking on a hands-free cell phone distract drivers? Undergraduate students "drove" in a high-fidelity driving simulator equipped with a hands-free cell phone. The car ahead brakes. How quickly does the subject react? The reaction times will be compared for subjects "driving" with and without using the cell phone. There are 40 student subjects available. 18 (a) What are the response and the explanatory variables? (b) Describe the design of a completely randomized experiment to leam the effect of talking on a hands-free cell phone on reaction time. (c) In a matched pairs design, all subjects drive both with and without using the cell phone. The two drives are on separate days to reduce carryover effects. One of the experimenters wants to assign the order of the two treatments at random: 20 subjects are chosen to drive first with the phone, and the remaining 20 drive first without the phone. The second experimenter argues it would be better to have everyone drive without the phone on the first day and with the phone on the second day so that all subjects are treated alike. Which experimenter do you agree with? Explain why. (d) Suppose there are large differences in the reaction times of the subjects. Would the matched pairs experiment be a better choice than the completely randomized experiment in this case? Explain briefly.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.