/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 Marijuana and work. How does smo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Marijuana and work. How does smoking marijuana affect willingness to work? Canadian researchers persuaded young adult men who used marijuana to live for 98 days in a "planned environment." The men earned money by weaving belts. They used their earnings to pay for meals and other consumption and could keep any money left over. One group smoked two potent marijuana cigarettes every evening. The other group smoked two weak marijuana cigarettes. All subjects could buy more cigarettes but were given strong or weak cigarettes, depending on their group. Did the weak and strong groups differ in work output and eamings? 29 (a) Outline the design of the experiment using 20 subjects with 10 assigned to each group. (b) Here are the names of the 20 subjects. Use software or Table B at line 126 to carry out the randomization your design requires. Abel Fleming Mani Scannell Aeffner Fritz Mattos Stout Birkel Giriunas Reíchert Williams Bower Kennedy Riddle Wilso DeVore Lamone Sawant Worbis (c) Do you think this can be run as a double-blind experiment? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Randomly assign 10 subjects to each group. (b) Use Table B to randomize. (c) Double-blind is challenging but possible with indistinct cannabis effects.

Step by step solution

01

Design the Experiment

The experiment involves assigning 20 young adult men, who all regularly use marijuana, into two groups of 10. Each group will live in a controlled environment for 98 days. One group will smoke two potent marijuana cigarettes every evening, and the other will smoke two weak marijuana cigarettes. Performance is measured by the number of belts woven and earnings kept after expenses.
02

Random Assignment of Subjects

To randomly assign subjects, you can use software or a random number table to ensure each subject has an equal chance of being in either group. For example, writing each subject's name on a slip of paper, then drawing them one by one to assign them alternately to the strong or weak marijuana cigarette group achieves randomization.
03

Review of Table B for Randomization

Using table B, particularly line 126, each subject is matched with a number and placed into groups. Typically, numbers can be assigned serially to make selection easier. Once two teams are created, the assignments ensure that each set has unbiased selection.
04

Double-blind Setup Feasibility

A double-blind experiment involves neither the subjects nor the investigators knowing which group receives the potent cigarettes. This might be challenging, as the difference between weak and strong marijuana may be perceivable by the subjects due to its effects. However, if possible to make indistinct and measure indirect effects, it could qualify as double-blind.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment
Random assignment is a crucial part of experimental design to ensure that the results are not biased. In this marijuana study, 20 subjects need to be divided into two groups of 10.
The groups should be equivalent in all respects except for the treatment they receive. In this case, one group receives potent marijuana cigarettes while the other receives weaker ones.
To achieve random assignment, you can use different methods such as:
  • Software that generates random assignments
  • Random number tables
  • Drawing names from a hat
The main goal is to give every subject an equal chance of being assigned to any group. This reduces bias and helps ensure the differences in outcomes can be attributed to the marijuana strength rather than pre-existing differences between individuals.
By mixing the participants randomly, any variability between them is evenly distributed between the two groups, enhancing the validity of the experiment.
Double-blind Experiment
A double-blind experiment is designed so that neither the participants nor the researchers know which group receives the potent treatment. This method aims to minimize bias and influence in experimental outcomes. However, in the study of marijuana effects on productivity, conducting a double-blind experiment can be challenging.
Participants might easily discern the effects of strong versus weak marijuana due to noticeable differences in potency. These perceptible differences can unintentionally inform them of their group assignment. Despite these challenges, researchers can strive for a level of blinding by disguising other aspects of the study.
They might focus on:
  • Masking appearance, labeling, and administration process of cigarettes
  • Measuring indirect outcomes that are less observable by participants
This experimentation strategy is pivotal for removing observer and participant bias, as knowing which treatment is being administered could sway participants' behavior and outcomes.
Controlled Environment
A controlled environment is essential for maintaining consistency during an experiment. In this exercise, participants were placed in a "planned environment" where all aspects except the treatment they received were controlled. This approach limits external variables that could affect outcomes and ensures that any observed changes in output and earnings can be attributed more confidently to the treatment, i.e., the strength of the marijuana cigarettes.
Some key aspects of a controlled environment include:
  • All participants living in the same setting for an equal duration (98 days in this study)
  • Regulating diet and daily routines to ensure they remain consistent
  • Providing equal access to resources, like additional cigarettes, with specific rules about their use
By controlling these factors, researchers can focus on the key variable they wish to test, here being the effect of marijuana potency on work output. This control strengthens the reliability of the conclusions drawn from the study.
Statistics in Research
In experimental research like the study of marijuana effects on labor willingness, statistics plays a pivotal role in analyzing data and drawing conclusions. Researchers use statistical tools to determine whether observed differences between the groups are significant and not due to random chance.
Some important statistical concepts include:
  • Descriptive Statistics: Summarize and describe the features of data, like mean number of belts woven and earnings retained.
  • Inferential Statistics: Used to make inferences or predictions about a larger population based on the sample data.
  • Significance Testing: Determines if the difference in output between the two groups is statistically significant.
These statistical measures are crucial as they help researchers validate their hypotheses about the effects of marijuana potency. Well-applied statistics ensure the findings are robust and generalizable, making them invaluable tools in experimental research.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do antioxidants prevent cancer? People who eat lots of fruits and vegetables have lower rates of colon cancer than those who eat little of these foods. Fruits and vegetables are rich in "antioxidants" such as vitamins \(A, C\), and \(\mathbf{E}\). Will taking antioxidants help prevent colon cancer? A medical experiment studied this question with 864 people who were at risk of colon cancer. The subjects were divided into four groups: daily beta-carotene, daily vitamins \(\mathrm{C}\) and \(\mathbf{E}\), all three vitamins every day, or daily placebo. After four years, the researchers were surprised to find no significant difference in colon cancer among the groups. 38 (a) What are the explanatory and response variables in this experiment? (b) Outline the design of the experiment. Use your judgment in choosing the group sizes. (c) The study was double-blind. What does this mean? (d) What does "no significant difference" mean in describing the outcome of the study? (e) Suggest some lurking variables that could explain why people who eat lots of fruits and vegetables have lower rates of colon cancer. The experiment suggests that these variables, rather than the antioxidants, may be responsible for the observed benefits of fruits and vegetables.

More Education Improves Driving? Although traffic fatalities have been decreasing for years, this decrease has not been experienced equally in all segments of the population. In fact, although the overall rate of traffic fatalities has been decreasing, the rate has declined the most for those with more education and has actually gone up for those without high school degrees. A recent study shows that among those over 25 , as education level increased from less than high school, to high school grad, to some college, to college grad, the rate of motor vehicle crash deaths decreased. 2 (a) What are the explanatory and response variables? (b) Those with less education tend to drive cars that are older, have poorer crash test ratings, and have fewer safety features such as side airbags. Are the variables age of car, crash test rating, and presence of safety features explanatory variables, response variables, or lurking variables? Explain your reason. (c) Is the association between traffic fatalities and education level good reason to think that a higher level of education actually causes an individual to be a safer driver? Explain why or why not.

Price Promotions-Amount versus Percentage Off. Price promotions are commonly used by retailers to motivate consumers to make a purchase. Both the amount off and percentage off are in widespread use, and research on when to wse each method has been mixed. The current study evaluated intent to purchase for a lower- and higher-priced item using either a fixed amount or a percentage off. For the lower-priced item, participants saw a promotion for balloons regularly selling for 48 pesos, but on sale with either a 12-peso or a \(25 \%\) discount. The higher-priced item was a 480-peso sweater on sale with either a 120 -peso discount or a \(25 \%\) discount. One hundred and fifty-one students were randomly assigned to the treatments and responded to two questions measuring value perceptions: "I would be saving a lot of money if I made my purchase at this store," and "This store is selling the advertised product at a considerable discount." Participants answered each question on the scale 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree").

Running and sleep. Sufficient sleep is important for adolescents for both their neural and psychological development. Despite this, daytime sleepiness and poor physical and psychological functioning related to chronic sleep disturbances are common. There is a growing body of evidence that exercise is associated with both better sleep and improved psychological functioning. Sixty participants were recruited from a high school in northwestern Switzerland. They were randomly assigned to either a running group or a control group, 30 to each group. The running group ran every moming for a little over 30 minutes on weekdays for a three-week period. All participants used a sleep log for subjective evaluation of sleep, and sleep was also objectively assessed at the beginning and end of the study using a sleep electroencephalographic device that measured quantities such as sleep efficiency and time spent in the four different sleep phases. Running was found to have a positive impact on both objective and subjective measures of sleep functioning. \({ }^{24}\) (a) What are the explanatory variable(s) and the response variable(s)? (b) Outline the design of the experiment. (c) Here are some more details on the treatment and control groups. All participants arrived at school at 7 a.m., and the running group did two laps on the track and then ran cross country in groups of at least four people for 30 minutes. The control group remained seated at the track, worked on homework, and interacted with each other. When the runners retumed, all participants prepared for school and ate a breakfast that was provided. Why do you think the experimenters had the control group arrive at 7 a.m., interact with classmates, and have breakfast together? Explain. Do you think having the control group do these activities is important for the types of conclusions that can be reached? How? (d) Time to sleep onset was measured before the beginning of the study and again at the end of the study for participants in both groups. Can this be considered a randomized controlled experiment with time to sleep onset as the response and four treatments (runners before, runners after, controls before, and controls after)? Explain why or why not.

The Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation asked whether a communitywide advertising campaign would reduce smoking. The researchers located 11 pairs of communities, with each pair similar in location, size, economic status, and so on. One community in each pair was chosen at random to participate in the advertising campaign and the other was not. This is (a) an observational study. (b) a matched pairs experiment. (c) a completely randomized experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.