/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 How Useful Is Regression? Figure... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

How Useful Is Regression? Figure \(4.8\) (page 119 ) displays the relationship between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2016 Masters Tournament. The correlation is \(r=0.198\). Figure \(4.6\) (page 115 ) gives data on number of boats registered in Florida and the number of manatees killed by boats for the years 1977 to 2015 . The correlation is \(r=0.953\). Explain in simple language why knowing only these correlations enables you to say that prediction of manatee deaths from number of boats registered by a regression line will be much more accurate than prediction of a golfer's second-round score from his first-round score.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Correlation \( r = 0.953 \) allows for more accurate predictions than \( r = 0.198 \).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Correlation

Correlation, denoted by \( r \), measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. A correlation close to 1 or -1 indicates a strong relationship, while a correlation close to 0 indicates a weak relationship.
02

Analyzing Golfer Scores Correlation

The golfer scores have a correlation \( r = 0.198 \), which indicates a weak linear relationship between the scores of the first and the second rounds. This means the scores are not strongly related.
03

Analyzing Manatee and Boat Registration Correlation

The data between the number of boats registered and manatee deaths has a correlation \( r = 0.953 \), indicating a very strong linear relationship. This implies that as the number of boats increases, the number of manatees killed by boats also tends to increase in a predictable way.
04

Comparing Predictive Accuracy

A higher correlation (closer to 1 or -1) means more accurate predictions can be made using a regression line. Because the correlation for manatee deaths and boat registrations (\( r = 0.953 \)) is much higher than for golfer scores (\( r = 0.198 \)), predictions about manatee deaths based on boat registrations will be more accurate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation
Correlation is a crucial concept in regression analysis that helps us understand how two variables are related. When we talk about correlation, we're referring to a number, represented by \( r \), that indicates the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables.
A correlation value close to \( 1 \) or \( -1 \) suggests a strong linear relationship. This means that as one variable increases, the other variable tends to also increase (positive correlation) or decrease (negative correlation) in a predictable fashion. On the other hand, a correlation close to \( 0 \) suggests a weak or no linear relationship between the two variables.
  • A positive \( r \) indicates that as one variable goes up, the other variable tends to go up as well.
  • A negative \( r \) indicates that as one variable goes up, the other variable tends to go down.
  • An \( r \) closer to \( 0 \) means the variables don't have a strong linear relationship; in other words, their movements aren't predictable relative to each other.
Understanding correlation is essential as it tells us whether using one variable to predict another would be effective, which is the basis of regression analysis.
Predictive Accuracy
Predictive accuracy refers to how well a regression model can forecast outcomes. In simpler terms, it is how closely the predicted values from the model match the actual data.
The correlation coefficient \( r \) is a key factor in determining predictive accuracy. A high absolute value of \( r \) (close to \( 1 \) or \( -1 \)) implies that the model will generally have higher predictive accuracy. This is because a strong relationship between the variables means the model can better "fit" the data.
When we compare the predictive accuracy of different models, we look at their correlation coefficients:
  • A higher \( r \), as seen in the manatee and boat registration example (\( r = 0.953 \)), means the regression will likely predict outcomes with high accuracy.
  • A lower \( r \), such as the golfers' scores (\( r = 0.198 \)), usually results in lower predictive accuracy, making forecasts less reliable.
Therefore, understanding the correlation can help in estimating how precise a model's predictions could be, thereby guiding decisions in both analysis and application.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship is a straight-line connection between two variables. It is depicted mathematically by a linear equation of the form: \[ y = mx + c \] where \( y \) is the dependent variable, \( x \) is the independent variable, \( m \) is the slope, and \( c \) is the y-intercept.
In a linear relationship, changes in the independent variable \( x \) lead to proportional changes in the dependent variable \( y \). This relationship can be visualized with a scatter plot, where a straight line closely fitting the data points signifies a strong linear relationship.
  • A strong linear relationship, such as the one between boat registrations and manatee deaths, allows for accurate predictions, as changes in one are consistently mirrored in the other.
  • A weak linear relationship, as with the golfers’ scores, implies that the two variables do not move in tandem, making predictions less reliable.
Understanding the nature of the linear relationship between variables is fundamental in assessing how well a regression model will work, and in determining its strength in making accurate predictions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What's my grade? In Professor Krugman's economics course, the correlation between the students' total scores prior to the final examination and their finalexamination scores is \(r=0.5\). The pre-exam totals for all students in the course have mean 280 and standard deviation 40 . The final-exam scores have mean 75 and standard deviation 8. Professor Krugman has lost Julie's final exam but knows that her total before the exam was 300 . He decides to predict her finalexam score from her pre-exam total. (a) What is the slope of the least-squares regression line of final-exam scores on pre-exam total scores in this course? What is the intercept? Interpret the slope in the context of the problem. (b) Use the regression line to predict Julie's final-exam score. (c) Julie doesn't think this method accurately predicts how well she did on the final exam. Use \(r^{2}\) to argue that her actual score could have been much higher (or much lower) than the predicted value.

Regression to the mean. Figure \(4.8\) (page 119) displays the relationship between golfers' scores on the first and second rounds of the 2016 Masters Tournament. The least-squares line for predicting second-round scores \((y)\) from first-round scores \((x)\) has equation \(y^{-} \hat{y}=62.91+0.164 x\). Find the predicted second-round scores for a player who shot 80 in the first round and for a player who shot 70 . The mean second-round score for all players was \(75.02\). So, a player who does well in the first round is predicted to do less well, but still better than average, in the second round. In addition, a player who does poorly in the first is predicted to do berter, but still worse than average, in the second. (Comment: This is regression to the mean. If you select individuals with extreme scores on some measure, they tend to have less extreme scores when measured again. That's because their extreme position is partly merit and partly luck, and the luck will be different next time. Regression to the mean contributes to lots of "effects." The rookie of the year often doesn't do as well the next year; the best player in an orchestral audition may play less well once hired than the runners-up; a student who feels she needs coaching after taking the SAT often does better on the next try without coaching.)

More exercise, more weight loss. In the study described in Example 5.5, the researchers found that, in general, subjects who engaged in more physical activity had higher total energy expenditures. In particular, they found that physical activity explained \(3.3 \%\) of the variation in total energy expenditure. What is the numerical value of the correlation between physical activity and total energy expenditure?

The price of diamond rings. A newspaper advertisement in the Straits Times of Singapore contained pictures of diamond rings and listed their prices, diamond weight (in carats), and gold purity. Based on data for only the 20 -carat gold ladies' rings in the advertisement, the least-squares regression line for predicting price (in Singapore dollars) from the weight of the diamond (in carats) is 17 $$ \text { price }=259.63+3721.02 \text { carats } $$ (a) What does the slope of this line say about the relationship between price and number of carats? (b) What is the predicted price when number of carats = 0? How would you interpret this price?

Another Reason Not to Smoke? A stop-smoking booklet says, "Children of mothers who smoked during pregnancy scored nine points lower on intelligence tests at ages three and four than children of nonsmokers." Suggest some lurking variables that may help explain the association between smoking during pregnancy and children's later test scores. The association by itself is not good evidence that mothers' smoking causes lower scores.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.