/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 Although consumers often want to... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Although consumers often want to touch products before purchasing them, they generally prefer that others have not touched products they would like to buy. Can another person touching a product create a positive reaction? Subjects were given instructions to contact a sales associate at a university bookstore who would provide them with a shirt to try on. When meeting the sales associate, subjects were told there was only one shirt left and it was being tried on by another "customer." The other customer trying on the shirt was a confederate of the experimenter and was either an attractive, well-dressed professional female model or an average-looking female college student wearing jeans and a T-shirt. Subjects, who were either males or females, saw the confederate leaving the dressing room where the shirt was left for them to try on. There was also a control group of subjects who were handed the shirt directly off the rack by the sales associate. Thus, there were five treatments: male subjects seeing a model, female subjects seeing a model, male subjects seeing a college student, female subjects seeing a college student, and the control group. Subjects evaluated the product on five dimensions, each dimension on a seven-point scale, with the five scores then averaged to give the subject's evaluation measure, with higher numbers indicating a more positive evaluation. Here are the sample sizes, means, and standard deviations for the five groups: \({ }^{15}\) $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \hline \text { Treatment Group } & n & \mathrm{x}^{-} \bar{x} & \boldsymbol{s} \\\ \hline \text { Males seeing a model } & 22 & 5.34 & 0.87 \\ \hline \text { Males seeing a student } & 23 & 3.32 & 1.21 \\ \hline \text { Females seeing a model } & 24 & 4.10 & 1.32 \\ \hline \text { Females seeing a student } & 23 & 3.50 & 1.43 \\ \hline \text { Controls } & 27 & 4.17 & 1.50 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Verify that the sample standard deviations allow the use of ANOVA to compare the population means. What do the means suggest about the effect of the subject's sex and the attractiveness of the confederate on the evaluation of the product? (b) The paper reports the ANOVA \(F=8.30\). What are the degrees of freedom for the ANOVA \(F\) statistic and the \(P\)-value? State your conclusions.

Short Answer

Expert verified
ANOVA is appropriate; there is a significant effect of attractiveness and sex on product evaluations.

Step by step solution

01

Assess Homogeneity of Variances

To verify if ANOVA can be used, we need the standard deviations to be relatively similar across groups. The given standard deviations are 0.87, 1.21, 1.32, 1.43, and 1.50 for the different groups. The largest standard deviation (1.50) is less than twice the smallest (0.87), so homogeneity of variances assumption is satisfied.
02

Interpret the Means

The means for each group are 5.34, 3.32, 4.10, 3.50, and 4.17 respectively. This suggests that the most positive evaluation (5.34) comes from males seeing a model. Comparatively, males seeing a student had the lowest mean (3.32). Other groups had intermediate evaluations. Attraction may positively influence product evaluation, especially for males.
03

ANOVA Degrees of Freedom

The degrees of freedom for the between-groups variation is the number of groups minus one: \(df_1 = 5 - 1 = 4\). The degrees of freedom for the within-group variation is the sum of each group's sample size minus the number of groups: \(df_2 = 22 + 23 + 24 + 23 + 27 - 5 = 114\).
04

Determine P-value and Conclusion

Given ANOVA \(F=8.30\), degrees of freedom \((4, 114)\), and knowing that a typical significance level is 0.05, we look up \(F\)-table or use a calculator. An \(F\)-value of 8.30 with these degrees of freedom typically implies \(P < 0.05\), suggesting rejecting the null hypothesis of no difference between means. Thus, attractiveness and subject's sex significantly influence product evaluations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Variance Homogeneity
Before conducting an ANOVA test, it's critical to check for the homogeneity of variances among the groups being compared. This condition, also known as homoscedasticity, implies that the variances should be fairly similar across all groups. We assess this by looking at the sample standard deviations provided in the data. In this scenario, the standard deviations for the groups are given as 0.87, 1.21, 1.32, 1.43, and 1.50. A common rule of thumb for assessing variance homogeneity is that the largest standard deviation should not be more than twice the smallest. Here, the largest standard deviation is 1.50, and the smallest is 0.87. This ratio is less than two, indicating that the assumption of variance homogeneity is satisfied.

When variances are homogeneous, it means that variations within each group are consistent, which is a necessary condition to proceed with ANOVA. This ensures that differences observed between treatment group means are due to the effect of treatments rather than inconsistencies in variation within groups. If variances were not homogeneous, it could potentially lead to incorrect conclusions being drawn from the ANOVA test.
Product Evaluation
In the context of the experiment, product evaluation plays a crucial role. Participants in the study were asked to evaluate a shirt they tried on after seeing a confederate wearing it. The evaluation was based on five dimensions and recorded on a seven-point scale. Each subject's scores on these dimensions were then averaged to provide an overall evaluation score.

This evaluation process is fundamental as it provides quantifiable data that reflects participants' perceptions about the product after observing the confederate. These evaluations are indicative of how the attractiveness and gender of the confederate might influence perceptions and attitudes towards the product. For instance, the mean scores from the data suggest that males gave higher evaluations when the shirt was last worn by an attractive model compared to an average-looking student. Meanwhile, the females' scores showed less variation, suggesting different influencing factors for product evaluation based on observer gender.
Experimental Design
In this study, the experimental design used is essential for understanding how different variables affect the outcome. A controlled experimental environment was created where subjects were exposed to varying conditions – seeing either an attractive, well-dressed model or an average-looking student before evaluating a product. There was also a control group where subjects received the product directly from a sales associate.

This kind of design helps isolate the effects of 'who wore the product last' on the evaluation scores. It incorporates both between-subject factors (the person trying the product before the subject) and within-subject controls (the method of shirt presentation).

The carefully balanced design between different gender and observer interactions allows researchers to draw conclusions about how the attractiveness of the individual previously wearing the product affects the subject's evaluation. This setup reduces potential bias and provides a robust data set for statistical analysis through ANOVA.
Sample Means
Sample means are vital in analyzing the results of the ANOVA test. They provide an average score for each group and are crucial for comparing the overall product evaluations between different treatment groups.

In the experiment provided, the sample means are 5.34 for males seeing a model, 3.32 for males seeing a student, 4.10 for females seeing a model, 3.50 for females seeing a student, and 4.17 for the control group. These differences in means highlight how varying conditions impact evaluations.

The comparison of these means indicates patterns in how the attractiveness of the confederate and the observer's gender influence product evaluation. For instance, the higher mean for males who saw a model suggests a positive bias toward products associated with attractive wearers. Understanding these means involves considering both their direct values and their implications for the superiority of certain conditions over others, as revealed by the ANOVA results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How does visual art affect the perception and evaluation of consumer products? Subjects were asked to evaluate an advertisement for bathroom fittings that contained an art image, a nonart image, or no image. The art image was Vermeer's painting Girl with a Pearl Earring, and the nonart image was a photograph of the actress Scarlett Johansson in the same pose wearing the same garments as the girl in the painting and was taken from the motion picture Girl with a Pearl Earring. Thus the art and nonart image were a match on content. College students were divided at random into three groups of 39 each, with each group assigned to one of the three types of advertisements. Students evaluated the product in the advertisement on a scale of 1 to 7 , with 1 being the most unfavorable rating and 7 being the most favorable. The paper reported a one-way ANOVA on the product evaluation index had \(F=6.29\) with \(P<0.05 .{ }^{12}\)

The purpose of analysis of variance is to compare (a) the variances of several populations. (b) the proportions of successes in several populations. (c) the means of several populations.

A study examined the effects of Vitamin \(\mathrm{E}\) and Memantine on the functional decline of patients in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. The investigators took 450 patients and randomly divided them into three groups, each containing 150 patients. One group was assigned to Vitamin E, one group to Memantine, and the last group to a placebo. The primary response was their score on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living (ADCSADL) Inventory, which is designed to assess a patient's functional ability to perform a range of daily living activities, with lower scores indicating worse function. The degrees of freedom for the ANOVA \(F\) statistic comparing the mean ADCS-ADL inventory scores are (a) 2 and \(147 .\) (b) 2 and \(447 .\) (c) 3 and \(147 .\)

Exercise \(27.49\) describes one of the experiments done by researchers at the University of Minne-sota to demonstrate that even being reminded of money makes people more self-sufficient and less involved with other people. Here are three more of these experiments. For each experiment, which statistical test from Chapters \(21,23,25\), and 27 would you use, and why? (a) Randomly assign student subjects to money and control groups. The control group unscrambles neutral phrases, and the money group unscrambles money- oriented phrases, as described in Exercise 27.49. Then ask the subjects to volunteer to help the experimenter by coding data sheets, about five minutes per sheet. Subjects said how many sheets they would volunteer to code. Participants in the money condition volunteered to help code fewer data sheets than did participants in the control condition. (b) Randomly assign student subjects to high-money, low-money, and control groups. After playing Monopoly for a short time, the high-money group is left with \(\$ 4000\) in Monopoly money, the low-money group with \(\$ 200\), and the control group with no money. Each subject is asked to imagine a future with lots of money (high-money group), a little money (low-money group), or just their future plans (control group). Another student walks in and spills a box of 27 pencils. How many pencils does the subject pick up? "Participants in the high-money condition gathered fewer pencils" than subjects in the other two groups. (c) Randomly assign student subjects to three groups. All do paperwork while a computer on the desk shows a screensaver of currency floating underwater (Group 1), a screensaver of fish swimming underwater (Group 2), or a blank screen (Group 3). Each subject must now develop an advertisement and can choose whether to work alone or with a partner. Count how many in each group make each choice. Choosing to perform the task with a coworker was reduced among money condition participants.

To detect the presence of harmful insects in farm fields, we can put up boards covered with a sticky material and examine the insects trapped on the boards. Which colors attract insects best? Experimenters placed six boards of each of four colors at random locations in a field of oats and measured the number of cereal leaf beetles trapped. Here are the data: \(^{9}=\) III BEETLES (a) Is there evidence that the colors differ in their ability to attract beetles? Use ANOVA to answer this question and state carefully the conclusion from this ANOVA. (b) How many pairwise comparisons are there when we compare four colors? (c) Which pairs of colors are significantly different when we require significance level \(5 \%\) for all comparisons as a group? In particular, is yellow significantly better than every other color?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.