/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Genetically altered mice. Geneti... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Genetically altered mice. Genetic influences on cancer can be studied by manipulating the genetic makeup of mice. One of the processes that turn genes on or off (so to speak) in particular locations is called "DNA methylation." Do low levels of this process help cause tumors? Compare mice altered to have low levels with normal mice. Of 33 mice with lowered levels of DNA methylation, 23 developed tumors. None of the control group of 18 normal mice developed tumors in the same time period. \({ }^{18}\) (a) Explain why we cannot safely use either the large-sample confidence interval or the test for comparing the proportions of normal and altered mice that develop tumors. (b) The plus four method adds two observations, a success and a failure, to each sample. What are the sample sizes and the numbers of mice with tumors after you do this? (c) Give a 99\% confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of the two populations that develop tumors.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Large-sample methods are inappropriate; use the plus four method. Confidence interval calculations give the intervals for groups.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem Context

We are comparing the proportion of tumors in two groups of mice, one with low levels of DNA methylation and the other a control group. We want to determine if this difference is statistically significant and calculate the confidence interval for the difference.
02

Evaluate Large-Sample Methods Appropriateness

Large-sample methods require a certain number of successes and failures in each group to be valid. Typically, both are greater than 5. In this case, we have 23 successes (tumors) and 10 failures in the altered group, and 0 successes with 18 failures in the control group, which doesn't satisfy this condition for the control group. Hence, large-sample methods cannot be safely used.
03

Apply Plus Four Method

The plus four method involves adding two additional observations (one success and one failure) to each sample. For the altered group, this transforms the sample size from 33 to 35, with 24 successes. For the control group, the sample size becomes 20, with 1 success and 19 failures.
04

Calculate Proportions with Adjustments

Calculate the proportion of tumors in each group with the plus four adjustments:- Altered group: \( p_1 = \frac{24}{35} \)- Control group: \( p_2 = \frac{1}{20} \)
05

Calculate the Standard Error for the Difference in Proportions

Use the formula for the standard error of the difference in proportions:\[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_1(1-p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{p_2(1-p_2)}{n_2}} \] where \( n_1 = 35 \) and \( n_2 = 20 \).
06

Determine the 99% Confidence Interval

The 99% confidence interval is given by:\[ (p_1 - p_2) \pm z \times SE \] where \( z \) is the z-score corresponding to 99% confidence (approximately 2.576). Substitute \( p_1 \), \( p_2 \), \( SE \), and \( z \) to compute the interval.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

DNA Methylation and Cancer
DNA methylation is a biological process that modifies the DNA to regulate gene activity. In simple terms, it acts like a switch that can turn genes on or off. Scientists are particularly interested in DNA methylation because of its potential role in cancer formation.
In our study with genetically altered mice, the aim was to understand if lower DNA methylation links to an increased tumor rate. By comparing two groups of mice—one with altered methylation levels and one control group with normal levels—we seek insights into the genetic influence on cancer.
• Lower methylation as a potential cause for tumors emphasizes the need for genetic investigation.
• Understanding these influences could lead to better cancer prevention and treatment strategies.
Confidence Intervals
A confidence interval provides a range of values that we believe contain the true difference in proportions between two groups. It offers an assurance level or 'confidence' that this range captures the actual figure we're estimating.
For our mouse study, a 99% confidence interval means we can be 99% sure that the interval calculated contains the true difference in tumor development proportions between the altered and control mice population.
The confidence interval considers the variability in data and provides a more robust picture than a simple point estimate. Therefore, it's an essential statistical tool to quantify the uncertainty in our sample data and make meaningful inferences about the larger populations of interest.
Plus Four Method
The plus four method is a statistical technique often used when the sample size or number of successes or failures is small. It involves adding one success and one failure to each group, adjusting the sample size when calculating the confidence intervals or significance tests. This adjustment helps to stabilize the variability inherent in smaller samples.
In the mouse study, after applying the plus four method, the altered group sample size became 35 with 24 instances of tumors, while the control group’s size became 20 with 1 tumor case. These adjustments help create a more reliable estimation of proportions, facilitating the generation of accurate confidence intervals.
• Enhances reliability of statistical inference in small samples
• Facilitates comparison between groups when assumptions of larger samples are not met
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance helps determine if the observed differences in sample data likely reflect true differences in the overall population. It answers the question: Is the observed effect due to chance, or is it a true difference?
In the context of our study, statistical significance assesses whether the difference in tumor proportions between altered and control mice is enough to infer that low levels of DNA methylation could likely cause cancer. If a result is statistically significant, it's unlikely to occur by random variation alone.
• Helps draw conclusions about population differences
• Strengthens the evidence for or against a hypothesized effect, such as a genetic cause for cancer
Deciding statistical significance typically involves comparing a p-value with a chosen significance level, commonly decision points like 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001, depending on how strongly you wish to control for Type I errors.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An aerosolized vaccine for measles was developed in Mexico and has been used on more than 4 million children since 1980. Aerosolized vaccines have the advantages of being able to be administered by people without clinical training and do not cause injection-associated infections. Despite these advantages, data about efficacy of the aerosolized vaccines against measles compared to subcutaneously injection of the vaccine have been inconsistent. Because of this, a large randomized controlled study was conducted using children in India. The primary outcome was an immune response to measles measured 91 days after the treatments. Among the 785 children receiving the subcutaneous injection, 743 developed an immune response, while among the 775 children receiving the aerosolized vaccine, 662 developed an immune response. \({ }^{3}\) (a) Compute the proportion of subjects experiencing the primary outcome for both the aerosol and injection groups. (b) Can we safely use the large-sample confidence interval for comparing the proportion of children who developed an immune response to measles in the aerosol and injection groups? Explain. (c) Give a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of children in the aerosol and injection groups who experienced the primary outcome. (d) The study described is an example of a noninferiority clinical trial intended to show that the effect of a new treatment, the aerosolized vaccine, is not worse than the standard treatment by more than a specified margin. 4 Specifically, is the percentage of children who developed an immune response for the aerosol treatment more than \(5 \%\) below the percentage for the subcutaneous injected vaccine? The five-percentage-point difference was based on previous studies and the fact that with a bigger difference the aerosolized vaccine would not provide the levels of protection necessary to achieve herd immunity. Using your answer in part (c), do you feel the investigators demonstrated the noninferiority of the aerosolized vaccine? Explain.

In the last 10 years, the prevalence of peanut allergies has doubled in Western countries. Is consumption or avoidance of peanuts in infants related to the development of peanut allergies in infants at risk? Subjects included infants between 4 and 11 months with severe eczema, egg allergy, or both, but who did not display a preexisting sensitivity to peanuts based on a skin-prick test. The infants were randomly assigned to either a treatment that avoided consuming peanut protein or a treatment in which at least 6 grams of peanut protein were consumed per week. The response was the presence or absence of peanut allergy at 60 months of age. In the avoidance group containing 263 infants, 36 had developed a peanut allergy at 60 months of age, while in the consumption group containing 266 infants, 5 had developed a peanut allergy. 13 (a) Despite the large sample sizes in both treatments, why should we not use the large-sample confidence interval for these data? (b) The plus four method adds one success and one failure in each sample. What are the sample sizes and counts of successes after you do this? (c) Give the plus four \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the probabilities of developing a peanut allergy for the avoidance and consumption treatments. What does your interval say about the comparison of these treatments in the context of the problem?

In recent years, a number of new commercial online services have emerged that have altered some aspect of people's lives. Of these, ride-hailing apps provide a good example of this new on-demand economy. A Pew Internet survey in 2016 examined several demographic variables of users of ride-hailing apps such as Uber or Lyft, including education, age, race, and income. Of the 4787 adults included in the survey, 2369 were college graduates, of which 687 had used a ride-hailing app. Among the 2418 adults who had not completed college, 268 had used a ride-hailing app. \({ }^{23}\) Is there good evidence that the proportion of adults who have used a ride-hailing app is different between college graduates and those without college degrees?

The Abecedarian Project is a randomized controlled study to assess the effects of intensive early childhood education on children who were at high risk based on several sociodemographic indicators. \({ }^{28}\) The project randomly assigned some children to a treatment group that was provided with early educational activities before kindergarten and the remainder to a control group. A recent follow-up study interviewed subjects at age 30 and evaluated educational, economic, and socioemotional outcomes to learn if the positive effects of the program continued into adulthood. The follow-up study included 52 individuals from the treatment group and 49 from the control group. Out of these, 39 from the treatment group and 26 from the control group were considered "consistently" employed (working 30 + hours per week in at least 18 of the 24 months prior to the interview). Does the study provide significant evidence that children who had early childhood education have a higher proportion of consistent employment than those who did not? How large is the difference between the proportions in the two populations that are consistently employed? Do inference to answer both questions. Be sure to explain exactly what inference you choose to do.

Never forget that even small effects can be statistically significant if the samples are large. To illustrate this fact, consider a sample of 148 small businesses. During a three-year period, 15 of the 106 headed by men and 7 of the 42 headed by women failed. 22 (a) Find the proportions of failures for businesses headed by women and businesses headed by men. These sample proportions are quite close to each other. Give the \(P\)-value for the \(z\) test of the hypothesis that the same proportion of women's and men's businesses fail. (Use the two-sided alternative.) The test is very far from being significant. (b) Now suppose that the same sample proportions came from a sample 30 times as large. That is, 210 out of 1260 businesses headed by women and 450 out of 3180 businesses headed by men fail. Verify that the proportions of failures are exactly the same as in part (a). Repeat the \(z\) test for the new data, and show that it is now significant at the \(\alpha=0.05\) level. (c) It is wise to use a confidence interval to estimate the size of an effect rather than just giving a \(P\)-value. Give the large sample \(95 \%\) confidence intervals for the difference between the proportions of women's and men's businesses that fail for the settings of both parts (a) and (b). What is the effect of larger samples on the confidence interval?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.