/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 The plus four 90\% confidence in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The plus four 90\% confidence interval for the difference between the proportion of rats that succeed when given \(M\) and the proportion that succeed without it is (a) \(0.455 \pm 0.312\). (b) \(0.417 \pm 0.304\). (c) \(0.417 \pm 0.185\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (c) \(0.417 \pm 0.185\) is the likely 90% confidence interval using the plus four method.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Given Information

We are given three options for the plus four 90% confidence interval for the difference between two proportions. The options are (a) \(0.455 \pm 0.312\), (b) \(0.417 \pm 0.304\), and (c) \(0.417 \pm 0.185\). We need to determine which of these intervals correctly represents the 90% confidence interval.
02

Understanding Plus Four Method

The plus four method adjusts sample proportions by adding two successes and two failures to each sample. This is particularly useful when the sample size is small to ensure a more accurate confidence interval. The confidence interval is constructed around the adjusted proportions, not the original sample proportions.
03

Perform Calculation (If Needed)

If raw data about proportions and sample sizes were provided, this step would involve calculating the adjusted proportions and then finding the confidence interval using the plus four method for confidence intervals regarding the difference between two population proportions. However, we are not provided with these data and instead are given different result options.
04

Compare and Choose the Correct Option

Given that calculating from raw data is not possible here, we'll infer the correct option using probable estimates and adjustments typical for a plus four 90% confidence interval. The choice depends on statistical reasonability based on intervals after adjustment, where a 90% CI typically implies lesser width. Option (c) has the smallest range which is more characteristic of a typical 90% plus four CI.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Plus Four Method
The Plus Four Method is a statistical technique that adjusts sample proportions to improve the accuracy of confidence intervals, particularly in cases with small sample sizes. By adding two successes and two failures to each sample, the method enhances the reliability of confidence intervals, especially when dealing with differences between two proportions. This adjustment helps to mitigate the effect of small samples that can skew results, making it an essential tool for inferential statistics.

When applying the plus four method, remember that the confidence interval is built around these adjusted proportions. This means that the interval accounts for the added data, providing a more stable and reliable estimate of the population parameter. While this method is beneficial, it's most effective when applied with consideration of the sample's original size and characteristics.
Difference Between Proportions
Understanding the difference between proportions is fundamental in statistics, particularly when you are interested in comparing two groups. In our context, it's about comparing the proportion of success in two different populations or treatments.

To find this, you compute the proportion from each group separately, then subtract one from the other. This result gives the difference in success rates between the two groups. For example, if one group has a success proportion of 0.6 and another has 0.4, their difference is 0.2.

This metric is highly significant because it shows the effect size, indicating how much one treatment or condition may differ from another. In hypothesis testing, such differences can help infer whether observed changes are due to chance or an actual effect. Understanding this difference helps in making informed statistical inferences and confident decision-making.
Statistical Inference
Statistical inference is a vital process in statistics that allows us to make predictions or informed guesses about a population based on a sample of data. It involves using data analysis to deduce properties of an underlying distribution of probability.

Through techniques like hypothesis testing and confidence intervals, statistical inference lets us analyze sample data to make broader generalizations or predictions. Its primary goal is to reach conclusions about population parameters.

In practice, statistical inference enables you to make assertions about differences between proportions, like those we see when comparing the success rates of groups. The insights drawn from inference can guide data-driven decisions, ensuring that conclusions are based on sound evidence rather than assumptions.
Confidence Level
The confidence level in statistics is a measure that quantifies the certainty or uncertainty of an inference being correct. It's a percentage that tells us how often the true population parameter falls within the confidence interval if you were to repeat the study numerous times.

Common confidence levels include 90%, 95%, and 99%. A 90% confidence level means that if you took 100 random samples and computed the confidence interval for each, you'd expect about 90 of the intervals to contain the true population parameter.

Choosing a confidence level involves balancing the need for precision with the need for certainty. A higher confidence level suggests more certainty but results in a wider confidence interval. Conversely, a lower level suggests less certainty but a narrower range, requiring a thoughtful approach to decide what's more crucial for the particular study at hand.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Chantix is different from most other quitsmoking products in that it targets nicotine receptors in the brain, attaches to them, and blocks nicotine from reaching them. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on Chantix was conducted with a 24-week treatment period. Participants in the study were cigarette smokers who were either unwilling or unable to quit smoking in the next month but were willing to reduce their smoking and make an attempt to quit within the next three months. Subjects received either Chantix or a placebo for 24 weeks, with a target of reducing the number of cigarettes smoked by \(50 \%\) or more by week \(4,75 \%\) or more by week 8, and a quit attempt by 12 weeks. The primary outcome measured was continuous abstinence from smoking during weeks 15 through 24. Of the 760 subjects taking Chantix, 244 abstained from smoking during weeks 15 through 24 , whereas 52 of the 750 subjects taking the placebo abstained during this same time period. \({ }^{24}\) Give a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the difference (treatment minus placebo) in the proportions of smokers who would abstain from smoking during weeks 15 through \(24 .\)

Many teens have posted profiles on a socialnetworking website. A sample survey in 2007 asked a random sample of teens with online profiles if they included false information in their profiles. Of 170 younger teens (aged 12 to 14\(), 117\) said yes. Of 317 older teens (aged 15 to 17), 152 said yes. 16 (a) Do these samples satisfy the guidelines for the large-sample confidence interval? (b) Give a 95\% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of younger and older teens who include false information in their online profiles.

The survey in Exercise 23.26 also looked at possible differences in the proportions of males and females who used ride-hailing apps. They found that 378 of the 2361 males and 340 of the 2426 females had used a ride-hailing app. Is there evidence of a difference between the proportions of males and females who have used a ridehailing app?

The \(90 \%\) large-sample confidence interval for the difference \(p_{9}-p_{12}\) in the proportions of 9th- and 12thgraders who ate breakfast daily is about (a) \(0.058 \pm 0.012\). (b) \(0.058 \pm 0.019\). (c) \(0.023 \pm 0.045\).

In recent years, a number of new commercial online services have emerged that have altered some aspect of people's lives. Of these, ride-hailing apps provide a good example of this new on-demand economy. A Pew Internet survey in 2016 examined several demographic variables of users of ride-hailing apps such as Uber or Lyft, including education, age, race, and income. Of the 4787 adults included in the survey, 2369 were college graduates, of which 687 had used a ride-hailing app. Among the 2418 adults who had not completed college, 268 had used a ride-hailing app. \({ }^{23}\) Is there good evidence that the proportion of adults who have used a ride-hailing app is different between college graduates and those without college degrees?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.