/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 Healthy men aged 21-35 were rand... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Healthy men aged 21-35 were randomly assigned to one of two groups: half received \(0.82\) gram of alcohol per kilogram of body weight; half received a placebo. Participants were then given 30 minutes to read up to 34 pages of Tolstoy's War and Peace (beginning at Chapter 1 , with each page containing approximately 22 lines of text). Every two to four minutes, participants were prompted to indicate whether they were "zoning out." The proportion of times participants indicated they were zoning out was recorded for each subject. The following table summarizes data on the proportion of episodes of zoning out. \({ }^{13}\) (The study report gave the standard error of the mean \(s / n \sqrt{n}\), abbreviated as SEM, rather than the standard deviation s.) $$ \begin{array}{llll} \hline \text { Group } & n & x^{-} \bar{x} & \text { SEM } \\ \hline \text { Alcohol } & 25 & 0.25 & 0.05 \\ \hline \text { Placebo } & 25 & 0.12 & 0.03 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) What are the two sample standard deviations? (b) What degrees of freedom does the conservative Option 2 use for twosample \(t\) procedures for these samples? (c) Using Option 2, give a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference between the two groups.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) \(s_1 = 0.25\), \(s_2 = 0.15\). (b) Degrees of freedom = 24. (c) 90% confidence interval: \([-0.106, 0.366]\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Sample Standard Deviations

To find the sample standard deviations for each group, use the relationship between the SEM, standard deviation \(s\), and the sample size \(n\): \( SEM = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \). Rearrange this to solve for \(s\): \( s = SEM \times \sqrt{n} \). For the Alcohol group: \( s_1 = 0.05 \times \sqrt{25} = 0.05 \times 5 = 0.25 \).For the Placebo group: \( s_2 = 0.03 \times \sqrt{25} = 0.03 \times 5 = 0.15 \).
02

Determine Degrees of Freedom Using Option 2

Option 2 for a two-sample \(t\) procedure uses the smaller of \(n_1 - 1\) and \(n_2 - 1\) as the degrees of freedom.For both groups, \(n_1 = 25\) and \(n_2 = 25\), thus:Degrees of freedom \(df = \min(25-1, 25-1) = 24\).
03

Compute the 90% Confidence Interval

The formula for the confidence interval for the difference between two means is:\[ (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t^* \cdot \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} \]Where \(t^*\) is the critical value from the \(t\)-distribution with 24 degrees of freedom for a 90% confidence interval. Using a \(t\)-distribution table or calculator, \(t^* \approx 1.711\).The difference in means is \(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 = 0.25 - 0.12 = 0.13\).Standard error of the difference is:\[ \sqrt{\frac{0.25^2}{25} + \frac{0.15^2}{25}} = \sqrt{0.01 + 0.009} = \sqrt{0.019} \approx 0.138 \]The confidence interval is:\[ 0.13 \pm 1.711 \times 0.138 = 0.13 \pm 0.236 \]This gives the interval: \([-0.106, 0.366]\), suggesting there is no statistically significant difference between the means at a 90% confidence level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standard Error of the Mean
Understanding the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) is crucial when working with data samples. The SEM measures how much the sample mean of your data is expected to differ from the true population mean. It is a way to express the precision of the sample mean estimate.
To calculate the SEM, you can use the formula:\[SEM = \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}\]where:
  • \(s\) is the sample standard deviation.
  • \(n\) is the sample size.
The SEM decreases as the sample size increases, which implies more reliable estimation of the population mean with larger samples. In the original exercise, SEM was used to summarize how often participants were zoning out.
For the alcoholic group, SEM was given as 0.05. This small SEM value suggests that the sample mean of the zoning out proportion is close to what we might expect from the overall population. Similarly, for the placebo group, the SEM was 0.03, indicating a similar understanding of the group's tendency to zone out.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we can be fairly certain the true population parameter lies. In statistical terms, it's a way to capture uncertainty around an estimate. If we compute a 90% confidence interval, for example, it implies that if we were to take 100 different samples and build a CI from each sample, we would expect the true parameter to be contained in approximately 90 of those intervals.
This is computed using the formula:\[(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t^* \cdot \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]where:
  • \(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2\) is the difference in sample means.
  • \(t^*\) is the critical value from the \(t\)-distribution.
  • \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are sample standard deviations.
  • \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are sample sizes.
In the exercise, the 90% CI was calculated for the difference in means between the alcohol and placebo groups. The computed interval was \([-0.106, 0.366]\). Such intervals help in determining if differences are statistically significant. In this case, as the interval includes zero, it suggests that the difference in means is not statistically significant at the 90% level.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom are a crucial concept in statistics that essentially tell us how many values in a calculation are free to vary. It's a foundational piece in the calculation of many statistical tests, including the \(t\)-test used in the exercise.
For independent samples \(t\)-tests, degrees of freedom can be calculated easily for equal sample sizes using the formula:\[df = \min(n_1 - 1, n_2 - 1)\]where \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sizes of the two samples involved.
In the case of the exercise, both groups consisted of 25 participants. Therefore, the degrees of freedom used for the \(t\)-test was 24, calculated from \(25 - 1 = 24\).
Having the correct degrees of freedom allows for the determination of the appropriate critical value \(t^*\) when constructing confidence intervals or conducting hypothesis tests. This parameter is pivotal in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of inferential statistics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Kathleen Vohs of the University of Minnesota and her coworkers carried out several randomized comparative experiments on the effects of thinking about money. Here's part of one such experiment. \({ }^{24}\) Ask student subjects to unscramble 30 sets of five words to make a meaningful phrase from four of the five words. The control group unscrambled phrases like "cold it desk outside is" into "it is cold outside." The treatment group unscrambled phrases that lead to thinking about money, turning "high a salary desk paying" into "a high-paying salary." Then each subject worked a hard puzzle, knowing that he or she could ask for help. Here are the times in seconds until subjects asked for help. For the treatment group: $$ \begin{array}{llllllll} 609444242 & 199 & 174 & 55 & 251 & 466 & 443 \end{array} $$ \(\begin{array}{llllllll}531 & 135 & 241 & 476 & 482 & 362 & 69 & 160\end{array}\) For the control group: \(\begin{array}{lllllllll}118 & 272 & 413 & 291 & 140 & 104 & 55 & 189 & 126\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llllllll}400 \quad 92 & 64 & 88 & 142 & 141 & 373 & 156\end{array}\) The researchers suspected that money is connected with self-sufficiency, so that the treatment group will ask for help less quickly on the average. Do the data support this idea?

Lamb's-quarter is a common weed that interferes with the growth of corn. An agriculture researcher planted corn at the same rate in 16 small plots of ground, then weeded the plots by hand to allow a fixed number of lamb's-quarter plants to grow in each meter of corn row. No other weeds were allowed to grow. Here are the yields of corn (bushels per acre) for only the experimental plots controlled to have one weed per meter of row and nine weeds per meter of row: \({ }^{9}\) $$ \begin{array}{l|llll} \hline \text { One weed/meter } & 166.2 & 157.3 & 166.7 & 161.1 \\ \hline \text { Nine weeds/meter } & 162.8 & 142.4 & 162.8 & 162.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Explain carefully why a two-sample \(t\) confidence interval for the difference in mean yields may not be accurate.

Does the way the press depicts the economic future affect the stock market? To investigate this, researchers analyzed the longest article about the crisis from the front page of the Money section of USA Today from a randomly chosen weekday of each week between August 2007 and June 2009. Articles were rated as to how positive or negative they were about the economic future. For each week, the change in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (average DJIA value the week after the article appeared minus the average the week the article appeared) was computed. Positive values of the change indicate that the DJIA increased. \({ }^{21}\) Here are the changes in DJIA corresponding to very positive articles: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrr}-325 & -200 & -225 & -75 & -25 & 25 & 50 \\ 225 & 25 & -225 & -250 & 200 & 250 & 75\end{array}\) Here are the changes in DJIA values corresponding to very negative articles: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrr} 150 & 300 & 225 & 125 & -175 & -225 & -375 \\ -175 & 0 & 125 & 175 & 475 & & \end{array} $$ Is there good evidence that the DJIA performs differently after very positive articles than after very negative articles? (a) Do the sample means suggest that there is a difference in the change in the DJIA after very positive articles versus after very negative articles? (b) Make stemplots for both samples. Are there any obvious departures from Normality? (c) Test the hypothesis \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) against the two-sided alternative. What do you conclude from part (a) and from the result of your test? (d) Among a host of different factors that are claimed to have triggered the economic crisis of 2007-2009, one was a "culture of irresponsibility" in the way the future was depicted in the press. Do the data provide any evidence that negative articles in the press contributed to poor performance of the DJIA?

Businesses know that customers often respond to background music. Do they also respond to odors? One study of this question took place in a small pizza restaurant in France on two Saturday evenings in May. On one of these evenings, a relaxing lavender odor was spread through the restaurant. On the other evening, no scent was used. Table \(21.2\) gives the time (in minutes) that two samples of 30 customers spent in the restaurant and the amount they spent (in euros). \({ }^{7}\) The two evenings were comparable in many ways (weather, customer count, and so on), so we are willing to regard the data as independent SRSs from spring Saturday evenings at this restaurant. The authors say, "Therefore, at this stage, it would be impossible to generalize the results to other restaurants." (a) Does a lavender odor encourage customers to stay longer in the restaurant? Examine the time data and explain why they are suitable for two-sample \(t\) procedures. Use the two-sample \(t\) test to answer the question posed. (b) Does a lavender odor encourage customers to spend more while in the restaurant? Examine the spending data. In what ways do these data deviate from Normality? Explain why, with 30 observations, the \(t\) procedures are reasonably accurate for these data. Use the two-sample \(t\) test to answer the question posed.

Do education programs for preschool children that follow the Montessori method perform better than other programs? A study compared five-year-old children in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who had been enrolled in preschool programs from the age of three. \({ }^{15}\) (a) Explain why comparing children whose parents chose a Montessori school with children of other parents would not show whether Montessori schools perform better than other programs. (In fact, all the children in the study applied to the Montessori school. The school district assigned students to Montessori or other preschools by a random lottery.) (b) In all, 54 children were assigned to the Montessori school and 112 to other schools at age three. When the children were five, parents of 30 of the Montessori children and 25 of the others could be located and agreed to and subsequently participated in testing. This information reveals a possible source of bias in the comparison of outcomes. Explain why. (c) One of the many response variables was score on a test of ability to apply basic mathematics to solve problems. Here are summaries for the children who took this test: $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \hline \text { Group } & n & \mathrm{x}^{-\bar{x}} & \mathrm{~s} \\ \hline \text { Montessori } & 30 & 19 & 3.11 \\ \hline \text { Control } & 25 & 17 & 4.19 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Is there evidence of a difference in the population mean scores? (The researchers used two-sided alternative hypotheses.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.