/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 54 (Optional topic) Should the gove... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(Optional topic) Should the government help the poor? In the 2014 General Social Survey, \(32 \%\) of those sampled thought of themselves as Democrats, \(45 \%\) as Independents, \(21 \%\) as Republicans, and \(2 \%\) as Other. \({ }^{23}\) When asked, " Should the government in Washington do everything possible to improve the standard of living of all poor Americans?"" \(23 \%\) of the Democrats, \(18 \%\) of the Independents, \(4 \%\) of the Republicans, and \(15 \%\) of Others agreed. Given that a person agrees that the government in Washington should do everything possible to improve the standard of living of all poor Americans, use Bayes' rule to find the probability the person thinks of him- or herself as a Democrat.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probability the person is a Democrat is approximately 0.443.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the events

Let \( D \) be the event that a person thinks of themselves as a Democrat. Let \( A \) be the event that a person agrees the government should help the poor.
02

Determine Given Probabilities

Given probabilities from the problem are as follows:\ \( P(D) = 0.32 \) (Probability of being a Democrat),\ \( P(A|D) = 0.23 \) (Probability of agreeing if Democrat).
03

Determine Probability of Agreement

Calculate \( P(A) \), the probability that a person agrees the government should help the poor.\ \[ P(A) = P(A|D)\cdot P(D) + P(A|I)\cdot P(I) + P(A|R)\cdot P(R) + P(A|O)\cdot P(O) \]\ where \( I,R,O \) are Independents, Republicans, and Others respectively: \( P(I) = 0.45,\ P(R) = 0.21,\ P(O) = 0.02 \), \( P(A|I) = 0.18,\ P(A|R) = 0.04,\ P(A|O) = 0.15 \).
04

Compute Probability of Agreement

Substitute the values calculated in Step 3 into the expression for \( P(A) \):\ \[ P(A) = 0.23\cdot 0.32 + 0.18\cdot 0.45 + 0.04\cdot 0.21 + 0.15\cdot 0.02 \].\ \[ P(A) = 0.0736 + 0.081 + 0.0084 + 0.003 = 0.166 \].
05

Apply Bayes' Rule

Find \( P(D|A) \) using Bayes' Rule:\ \[ P(D|A) = \frac{P(A|D)\cdot P(D)}{P(A)} \].\ Substituting the known values gives\ \[ P(D|A) = \frac{0.23\cdot 0.32}{0.166} = \frac{0.0736}{0.166} \approx 0.443 \].

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Probability Calculation
Probability calculation is the foundational step in determining the likelihood of an event occurring. The essence of probability is to quantify the chance of an event, expressed as a number between 0 and 1. Let’s break down how probabilities are calculated in a scenario:
  • Firstly, define the events clearly. In our exercise, events include being a Democrat, Independent, Republican, or Another party, and agreeing with a governmental policy.
  • Next, identify known probabilities. For instance, the straight probabilities: 32% of those asked are Democrats.
  • Combine probabilities when necessary. In this task, we compute the overall probability of agreement that the government should help the poor by considering the probabilities of agreement within each political group.
It’s like crafting a recipe, where each ingredient’s proportion contributes to the overall flavor. Always ensure your probabilities add up appropriately, helping to reliably predict the likelihood of subsequent events.
Exploring Conditional Probability
Conditional probability extends the concept of classic probability by focusing on the likelihood of an event occurring given that another event has already happened. Essentially, it's a way to refine probability calculations when you have additional information.
For instance, in the exercise, we looked at the probability of someone agreeing that the government should help the poor if we already know they're a Democrat. This is represented mathematically as \( P(A|D) \), meaning the probability of agreement \( A \) given Democrat \( D \).
  • Conditional probabilities are central in contexts where multiple events might influence an outcome.
  • It uses known probabilities in a narrower scope to derive new insight.
  • It requires careful combination of original probabilities to yield new, context-specific data.
Think of it as seeing through a clear lens, where knowing one detail helps us see the bigger picture more accurately.
Applying Statistical Reasoning
Statistical reasoning allows us to make sense of numbers and probabilities, transforming them into actionable insights. It involves using probability data to derive logical conclusions about the world.
In our exercise, statistical reasoning is applied using Bayes' Theorem. This theorem helps update our belief about a hypothesis, in this case, how likely someone is to be a Democrat if they support governmental aid for the poor, based on prior knowledge.
  • Bayes' Theorem combines our prior knowledge with new evidence. For example, using known data about political affiliations and agreement rates.
  • It’s an iterative process, constantly refining understanding by incorporating new information.
  • In practice, statistical reasoning solidifies abstract probability into real-world applications, making seemingly vague data meaningful.
Consider it a wise teacher, guiding you from assumptions and raw data to informed conclusions, showing how interconnected information leads to new insights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Independent? In 2015 , the Report on the LC Berkeley Faculty Salary Equity Study shows that 87 of the university's 222 assistant professors were women, along with 137 of the 324 associate professors and 243 of the 972 full professors. (a) What is the probability that a randomly chosen Berkeley professor (of any rank) is a woman? (b) What is the conditional probability that a randomly chosen professor is a woman, given that the person chosen is a full professor? (c) Are the rank and sex of Berkeley professors independent? How do you know?

Playing the lottery. New York State's "Quick Draw" lottery moves right along. Players choose between 1 and 10 numbers from the range 1 to \(80 ; 20\) winning numbers are displayed on a screen every four minutes. If you choose just one number, your probability of winning is \(20 / 80\), or \(0.25\). Lester plays one number eight times as he sits in a bar. What is the probability that all eight bets lose?

(Optional topic) College degrees and sex. According to the National Center for Educational Statistics, in \(201426 \%\) of college degrees were associate degrees, \(49 \%\) were bachelor's, \(20 \%\) were master's, and \(5 \%\) were doctor's (including professional degrees such as MD, DDS, and law degrees). Women earned \(61 \%\) of the associate degrees, \(57 \%\) of the bachelor's, \(60 \%\) of the master's, and \(52 \%\) of the doctor's. (a) What are the prior probabilities for the four types of degrees? (b) Find the posterior probabilities for the type of degree given that the recipient is female. Is the relationship between the prior and posterior probabilities what you would expect? Explain briefly.

An instant lottery game gives you probability \(0.02\) of winning on any one play. Plays are independent of each other. If you play three times, the probability that you win on none of your plays is about (a) \(0.98\). (b) \(0.94\) (c) \(0.000008\).

If the DNA profile (or combination of alleles) found on the hair is possessed by one in \(1.6\) million individuals and the database of convicted felons contains \(4.5\) million individuals, approximately how many individuals in the database would demonstrate a match between their DNA and that found on the hair?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.