/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 If we assume that the conditions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

If we assume that the conditions for correlation are met, which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a) A correlation of 0.02 indicates a strong positive association. b) Standardizing the variables will make the correlation \(0 .\) c) Adding an outlier can dramatically change the correlation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) False, (b) False, (c) True.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing statement (a)

The statement claims a correlation of 0.02 represents a strong positive association. Correlation values range from -1 to 1. A correlation of 0.02 is very close to 0, indicating a very weak or negligible association, not a strong one. Hence, the statement is false.
02

Analyzing statement (b)

The statement suggests that standardizing the variables results in a correlation of 0. Standardizing involves converting data to a z-score, having a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. However, correlation measures the linear relationship and is unaffected by changes in scale or origin of the data, so standardizing does not change it to 0. The statement is false.
03

Analyzing statement (c)

The statement claims that adding an outlier can dramatically change the correlation. Outliers, being extreme values, have a significant impact on correlation by either inflating or deflating it. Adding an outlier can therefore drastically alter the calculated correlation. The statement is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standardizing Variables
Standardizing variables is a common technique used in statistics to prepare data for analysis. When we standardize variables, we transform the data into a z-score. A z-score is a statistical measurement that describes a value's relation to the mean of a group of values. This transformation is achieved by subtracting the mean from each data point and then dividing the result by the standard deviation. As a result:
  • The mean of the transformed data becomes 0.
  • The standard deviation becomes 1.
Despite these changes in scale, the process of standardizing does not affect the correlation between variables. Correlation assesses the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables, irrespective of units or scale. Therefore, the correlation coefficient remains unchanged even after standardizing the variables. This fact ensures that standardizing is a powerful technique to simplify data without affecting relationships interpreted through correlation.
Outliers in Data
In data analysis, an outlier is a data point that is significantly different from other observations. Outliers can heavily influence statistical measures, such as mean and correlation. They can arise due to measurement errors, experimental conditions, or simply variations in the data.
Adding an outlier to a dataset can dramatically change the correlation. Since correlation measures the degree to which two variables move together, an outlier can artificially inflate or deflate this measure. For example:
  • An outlier with a large difference from the average can increase the apparent correlation if it lies along the regression line.
  • Conversely, if the outlier falls outside the general data trend, it may reduce the observed correlation.
Due to their significant impact, it's crucial to identify outliers in datasets and consider their causes and effects carefully. Determining whether an outlier should be addressed or removed depends on the context and understanding of the data.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship describes a situation in which two variables are proportional to each other. This implies that any change in one variable tends to be mirrored by a change in the other variable. In statistical terms, a linear relationship is characterized by a straight line when plotted on a graph.
Correlation is the numerical value that quantifies the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. Correlation coefficients range from -1 to 1:
  • A correlation of 1 signifies a perfect positive linear relationship, where as one variable increases, the other also increases.
  • A correlation of -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, where as one variable increases, the other decreases.
  • A correlation of 0 shows no linear relationship between the variables.
Understanding linear relationships through correlation helps in predicting the behavior of one variable based on the changes in another, which is essential for statistical modeling and decision-making in various fields.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the previous exercise you analyzed the association between the amounts of fat and sodium in fast food hamburgers. What about fat and calories? Here are data for the same burgers: $$\begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline \text { Fat }(\mathrm{g}) & 19 & 31 & 34 & 35 & 39 & 39 & 43 \\ \text { Calories } & 410 & 580 & 590 & 570 & 640 & 680 & 660 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

A researcher studies children in elementary school and finds a strong positive linear association between height and reading scores. a) Does this mean that taller children are generally better readers? b) What might explain the strong correlation?

The errors in predicting hurricane tracks (examined in this chapter) were given in nautical miles. An ordinary mile is 0.86898 nautical miles. Most people living on the Gulf Coast of the United States would prefer to know the prediction errors in miles rather than nautical miles. Explain why converting the errors to miles would not change the correlation between

If we assume that the conditions for correlation are met, which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a) A correlation of -0.98 indicates a strong, negative association. b) Multiplying every value of \(x\) by 2 will double the correlation. c) The units of the correlation are the same as the units of \(y .\)

A polling organization is checking its database to see if the two data sources it used sampled the same zip codes. The variable Data source \(=1\) if the data source is Metro Media, 2 if the data source is Data Qwest, and 3 if it's Rolling Poll. The organization finds that the correlation between five-digit zip code and Data source is \(-0.0229 .\) It concludes that the correlation is low enough to state that there is no dependency between Zip Code and Source of Data. Comment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.