/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Read each brief report of statis... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Read each brief report of statistical research, and identify a) whether it was an observational study or an experiment. If it was an observational study, identify (if possible) b) whether it was retrospective or prospective. c) the subjects studied and how they were selected. d) the parameter of interest. e) the nature and scope of the conclusion the study can reach. If it was an experiment, identify (if possible) b) the subjects studied. c) the factor(s) in the experiment and the number of levels for each. d) the number of treatments. e) the response variable measured. f) the design (completely randomized, blocked, or matched). g) whether it was blind (or double-blind). h) the nature and scope of the conclusion the experiment can reach. Truancy A group of researchers analyzed three observational studies that followed children's attendance and mental health, among other things. They found that students who missed more school tended to have more incidences of depression. One study followed 20,745 secondary students in a random sample of all secondary schools in the United States. Another tracked 2,311 first graders at 18 Baltimore schools who were participating in an intervention program. The third study followed 671 students from first or fifth grade to their senior year in high risk areas of Eugene, OR, who had been randomly assigned to an intervention or to no intervention.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Observational, prospective study. Subjects: students in the U.S., Baltimore, Eugene. Parameter: school attendance and depression.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Study Type

This is an observational study, as the researchers did not manipulate any variables but observed outcomes such as attendance and mental health based on existing data.
02

Determine Retrospective or Prospective

Since the studies followed students over time to observe outcomes, they are likely prospective observational studies.
03

Identify Subjects and Selection Method

The subjects are students. One study involved a random sample of secondary students in the U.S., the second involved first graders in Baltimore, and the third followed students in high-risk areas of Eugene, OR with some assigned to intervention programs.
04

Parameter of Interest

The parameter of interest is the relationship between school attendance and mental health, specifically depression incidences.
05

Conclusion Scope

The studies can suggest an association between increased school absenteeism and higher incidences of depression, but cannot establish causation due to potential confounding factors in observational studies.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Prospective Study
A prospective study is a type of observational study where researchers observe the subjects over a period of time. They start with a group of subjects and follow them into the future.
These studies allow scientists to watch for outcomes, such as the development of diseases or changes in behavior while recording the exposure to certain risk factors. In the context of our exercise, the researchers followed students for an extended period to observe their school attendance patterns and mental health outcomes.
This approach helps in understanding how certain factors might influence future behaviors or health problems. However, since researchers are not intervening or trying to influence the outcome, it limits them from determining definite causations.
Mental Health Analysis
Analyzing mental health within a study involves looking at psychological factors such as depression or anxiety. In the scenario given, the researchers were particularly interested in seeing if there was a link between school absenteeism and mental health issues.
Mental health analysis can be complex because various external and internal factors affect it. This includes family history, personal experiences, and environmental influences.
Even though observational studies like the one described can highlight patterns—like the potential link between missing school and increased depression—they cannot definitively prove one causes the other due to the non-manipulative nature of the study.
Student Attendance
Student attendance in a study context is often tracked to examine its effects on academic and personal outcomes. Regular attendance at school is typically linked with better academic performance and social interactions.
However, in the observational studies discussed, researchers were interested in seeing if attendance had a correlation with mental health, specifically depression. The findings suggested that students who missed more school tended to have more instances of depression, though the reasons behind this were not clearly established through the study alone.
This underscores the importance of considering different variables that may influence both attendance and mental health in such studies.
Random Sampling
Random sampling is a key feature of designing studies that aspire to produce generalizable results. It means selecting subjects from a larger population in such a way that each individual has an equal chance of being chosen.
In the described studies, random sampling was used in selecting secondary students across the United States and assigning interventions in Oregon schools. This method helps to ensure that the sample represents the broader population well, minimizing biases.
The use of random sampling in observational studies is crucial as it helps strengthen findings by ensuring that the observed associations are not heavily influenced by pre-existing differences among study subjects.
Statistical Research
Statistical research involves the collection, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data. It's fundamental in helping researchers draw meaningful conclusions from study findings.
Within the context of the described studies, statistical methods were likely used to analyze data on school attendance and mental health to identify patterns or associations. Findings from statistical research can help shape policies, such as those aimed at improving school attendance or mental health interventions.
However, researchers must interpret statistical data carefully, as correlations found in observational studies do not imply causation. Good statistical research often explores multiple factors and controls for confounding variables to provide clearer insights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For his Statistics class experiment, researcher J. Gilbert decided to study how parents' income affects children's performance on standardized tests like the SAT. He proposed to collect information from a random sample of test takers and examine the relationship between parental income and SAT score. a) Is this an experiment? If not, what kind of study is it? b) If there is relationship between parental income and SAT score, why can't we conclude that differences in score are caused by differences in parental income?

Hamstrings Athletes who had suffered hamstring injuries were randomly assigned to one of two exercise programs. Those who engaged in static stretching returned to sports activity in a mean of 15.2 days faster than those assigned to a program of agility and trunk stabilization exercises. (Journal of Orthopaedic \(\&\) Sports Physical Therapy 34 [March 2004 ]: 3 ) a) Explain why it was important to assign the athletes to the two different treatments randomly. b) There was no control group consisting of athletes who did not participate in a special exercise program. Explain the advantage of including such a group. c) How might blinding have been used? d) One group returned to sports activity in a mean of 37.4 days \((S D=27.6 \text { days })\) and the other in a mean of 22.2 days \((S D=8.3\) days). Do you think this difference is statistically significant? Explain.

People generally don't think "health" when they hear the word "maggot," but one experiment tested the ability of maggots to remove dead tissue from open wounds that would not heal on their own. Sterile maggots were placed in a small pouch which, in turn, was placed on the wound. 100 men with wounds on their lower limbs were randomly assigned to receive either a traditional surgical treatment or maggot therapy. After eight days, the percentage of dead tissue in the wounds that underwent maggot treatment was \(54.5 \%,\) compared to \(66.5 \%\) with the surgical treatment. (The difference decreased with time, and the advantage disappeared by about day \(15 .\) ) Neither patients nor the doctors evaluating the wounds knew which therapy had been applied. (Patients were blindfolded as bandages were changed.) Surprisingly, the number of patients that reported a crawling sensation in their wound was about the same in both groups (http://www.myhealthnewsdaily.com/2030maggots-clean-wounds- faster-surgeons.html) a) What kind of study was this? b) Is that an appropriate choice for this investigation? c) Who were the subjects? d) Identify the treatment and response variables.

Read each brief report of statistical research, and identify a) whether it was an observational study or an experiment. If it was an observational study, identify (if possible) b) whether it was retrospective or prospective. c) the subjects studied and how they were selected. d) the parameter of interest. e) the nature and scope of the conclusion the study can reach. If it was an experiment, identify (if possible) b) the subjects studied. c) the factor(s) in the experiment and the number of levels for each. d) the number of treatments. e) the response variable measured. f) the design (completely randomized, blocked, or matched). g) whether it was blind (or double-blind). h) the nature and scope of the conclusion the experiment can reach. Superglue 130 patients with eligible lacerations randomly assigned to have the wound closed either with Octylcyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive (essentially superglue) or with traditional sutures. When evaluated at the end of the study, the two treatments worked equally well with regard to scarring, and the adhesive was less painful and worked faster.

Swimsuits A swimsuit manufacturer wants to test the speed of its newly designed suit. The company designs an experiment by having 6 randomly selected Olympic swimmers swim as fast as they can with their old swimsuit first and then swim the same event again with the new, expensive swimsuit. The company will use the difference in times as the response variable. Criticize the experiment and point out some of the problems with generalizing the results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.