/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 Toxic waste The Environmental Pr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Toxic waste The Environmental Protection Agency took a map of a region near a former industrial waste dump and placed a grid of 552 squares on it. They randomly selected any 16 of those squares from which to collect soil samples and checked each for evidence of toxic chemicals. a) What type of sampling did they use? b) Is there any sort of bias associated with this sampling procedure? c) One researcher suggests that plots closer to the old dump site could contain more contaminants than those farther away. How could the sampling procedure be improved to take this into account

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Simple random sampling. b) No bias in selection, but location variance isn't considered. c) Use stratified sampling based on proximity to the dump.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Sampling Method

The EPA randomly selects 16 squares from a grid of 552 to collect soil samples, meaning every square has an equal chance of being selected. This method is known as simple random sampling because each square is independently chosen with no bias regarding location or other characteristics.
02

Evaluate Potential Bias

Since the outcome of the sampling was fully random, there is no inherent selection bias in how the samples were chosen. However, randomness does not account for or ensure consideration of spatial patterns or gradients such as proximity to the waste dump, leading to potential under- or overestimation of contamination.
03

Suggest Improvement to Address Proximity Concerns

To address the possibility that squares nearer to the dump site may have more contamination, a stratified sampling method could be utilized. The grid can be divided into several zones based on distance from the dump, and samples can be collected from each zone proportionally. This way, areas closer to the dump are more purposefully examined.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Simple Random Sampling
Simple random sampling is a basic sampling method used in statistical research. Imagine if you have a big jar filled with marbles, and you randomly pick a few without looking, each marble has the same chance of being picked. That's similar to what happens in simple random sampling.

In the exercise, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used simple random sampling when they chose 16 squares from a grid of 552 squares. Here, each square, like each marble, had an equal chance of being selected. This type of sampling ensures that every possible combination of squares could potentially be chosen, providing a fair representation of the whole area.
  • It is straightforward and easy to implement.
  • This method minimizes selection bias by giving every unit of the population an equal shot.
  • It's useful when the population is homogeneous, meaning any one part isn't more important or different compared to the rest.
Even though simple random sampling is a cornerstone of many statistical practices, it's not always perfect for every situation as it may overlook patterns within the population.
Bias in Sampling
Bias in sampling is when the sample chosen in a study does not accurately represent the population from which it was taken. Even with random sampling, certain biases can creep in due to the nature of what is being studied.

In the EPA scenario, while the random selection method was free from intentional bias, there is still the risk of overlooking spatial biases, which means areas either close to or far from the dump might disproportionately contain contaminants. This is because while each square has an equal chance of being picked, the spatial distribution of contaminates isn’t random.
  • Random sampling does not adjust for uneven distributions within the population.
  • Spatial biases may lead to incorrect assumptions if near and far regions behave differently.
  • Awareness of such biases is key to designing more effective sampling strategies.
It is crucial to acknowledge these potential biases to ensure the conclusions drawn from data are valid, especially in environmental studies where patterns like proximity can directly influence results.
Stratified Sampling
Stratified sampling is a method that addresses certain biases by dividing the population into distinct subgroups and then taking samples from each subgroup. It's like ensuring you have a variety of flavors in an ice cream sample by taking some from every flavor category.

In the problem at hand, using stratified sampling could improve the research outcomes by taking into account the proximity of squares to the dump site. The grid can be divided into zones based on the distance to the dump. For instance, have inner, middle, and outer zones and then sample from each zone systematically. This ensures all areas get examined proportionally, and regions closer to the dump, which may have more contamination, are not overlooked.
  • Stratified sampling caters to subpopulation variations, ensuring each subgroup is adequately represented.
  • This method enhances accuracy by considering specific characteristics of each stratum.
  • It provides a more comprehensive view of the entire area compared to simple random sampling alone.
Stratified sampling offers a refined approach by making sure the structure within the population is captured in the sample. This is particularly valuable in environmental studies where specific factors like distance to a source of pollution are crucial.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cell phone survey What about drawing a random sample only from cell phone exchanges? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of such a sampling method compared with surveying randomly generated telephone numbers from non-cell phone exchanges. Do you think these advantages and disadvantages have changed over time? How do you expect they'll change in the future?

Phone surveys Anytime we conduct a survey, we must take care to avoid undercoverage. Suppose we plan to select 500 names from the city phone book, call their homes between noon and \(4 \mathrm{PM}\), and interview whoever answers, anticipating contacts with at least 200 people. a) Why is it difficult to use a simple random sample here? b) Describe a more convenient, but still random, sampling strategy. c) What kinds of households are likely to be included in the eventual sample of opinion? Excluded? d) Suppose, instead, that we continue calling each number, perhaps in the morning or evening, until an adult is contacted and interviewed. How does this improve the sampling design? e) Random-digit dialing machines can generate the phone calls for us. How would this improve our design? Is anyone still excluded?

\- Another mistaken poll Prior to the mayoral election discussed in Exercise \(15,\) the newspaper also conducted a poll. The paper surveyed a random sample of registered voters stratified by political party, age, sex, and area of residence. This poll predicted that Amabo would win the election with \(52 \%\) of the vote. The newspaper was wrong: Amabo lost, getting only \(46 \%\) of the vote. Do you think the newspaper's faulty prediction is more likely to be a result of bias or sampling error? Explain.

Roper Through their Roper Reports Worldwide, GfK Roper conducts a global consumer survey to help multinational companies understand different consumer attitudes throughout the world. Within 30 countries, the researchers interview 1000 people aged \(13-65 .\) Their samples are designed so that they get 500 males and 500 females in each country. (www.gfkamerica.com) a) Are they using a simple random sample? Explain. b) What kind of design do you think they are using?

Student Center Survey For their class project, a group of Statistics students decide to survey the student body to assess opinions about the proposed new student center. Their sample of 200 contained 50 first-year students, 50 sophomores, 50 juniors, and 50 seniors. a) Do you think the group was using an SRS? Why? b) What sampling design do you think they used?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.