/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 36 Recently, a group of adults who ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Recently, a group of adults who swim regularly for exercise were evaluated for depression. It turned out that these swimmers were less likely to be depressed than the general population. The researchers said the difference was statistically significant. a) What does "statistically significant" mean in this context? b) Is this an experiment or an observational study? Explain. c) News reports claimed this study proved that swimming can prevent depression. Explain why this conclusion is not justified by the study. Include an example of a possible lurking variable.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) It means the results are unlikely due to chance. b) Observational study. c) Cannot prove causation; possible lurking variable: more free time.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Statistical Significance

In this context, "statistically significant" means that the difference in depression levels between the swimmers and the general population is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. This suggests that there is some underlying factor contributing to this difference.
02

Distinguishing Experiment from Observational Study

This is an observational study because the researchers did not assign individuals randomly to swim or not to swim. They observed existing behaviors and analyzed the results without manipulating any variables.
03

Evaluating Claims and Lurking Variables

The conclusion that swimming "proves" prevention of depression is not justified because this study is observational and cannot establish causation. For example, a possible lurking variable could be that people who swim regularly may have more free time or resources to engage in healthy activities, which could contribute to lower depression levels.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
In research, it's important to distinguish between two main types of studies: experiments and observational studies. An observational study, like the one involving the group of swimmers, is where researchers simply observe and measure outcomes without trying to influence them. They don't assign participants to a treatment or control group or manipulate any variables.

In this case, the researchers observed a naturally occurring group of individuals who swim regularly and analyzed their levels of depression. By doing so, they gathered data without altering or controlling the participants’ behavior. Observational studies are common in cases where random assignment is either unethical or impractical.

One thing to keep in mind is that observational studies are valuable for finding relationships or patterns, but they don't provide direct evidence of causation.
Causation vs. Correlation
A common pitfall in interpreting research findings is confusing correlation with causation. Correlation indicates a relationship between two variables, while causation confirms that one variable directly affects the other.

In the swimming study, there is a correlation: swimmers tend to be less depressed than the general population. However, without further evidence, we can't say that swimming causes this decrease in depression. It could be that people who swim are generally healthier, happier individuals or that another variable influences both swimming habits and mood.

To establish causation, researchers would need to conduct an experiment with random assignment and control groups, ensuring that swimming is the only differing factor. Until then, we can only speak of a correlation between swimming and depression levels.
Lurking Variables
Lurking variables are hidden influences that could affect the outcomes of a study. They can muddy the waters when trying to interpret the results of observational studies.

In the scenario with the swimmers, a lurking variable might be other lifestyle factors that accompany regular swimming. For example, those who have the time and resources to swim regularly might also engage in other healthy behaviors, such as maintaining a balanced diet or having a supportive social network.

This means that the lower levels of depression observed in swimmers could be partly or entirely due to these other positive lifestyle factors. Identifying and accounting for lurking variables is crucial for making accurate interpretations of observational study results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The chapter also described a completely randomized two-factor experiment testing OptiGro fertilizer in conjunction with two different routines for watering the plants. Describe a strategy to randomly assign the 24 tomato plants to the six treatments.

An experiment that showed that subjects fed the DASH diet were able to lower their blood pressure by an average of \(6.7\) points compared to a group fed a "control diet." All meals were prepared by dieticians. a) Why were the subjects randomly assigned to the diets instead of letting people pick what they wanted to eat? b) Why were the meals prepared by dieticians? c) Why did the researchers need the control group? If the DASH diet group's blood pressure was lower at the end of the experiment than at the beginning, wouldn't that prove the effectiveness of that diet? d) What additional information would you want to know in order to decide whether an average reduction in blood pressure of \(6.7\) points was statistically significant?

Exercise 10 describes an experiment showing that exercise helped people sleep better. The experiment involved other groups of subjects who didn't exercise. Why didn't the experimenters just have everyone exercise and see if their ability to sleep improved?

For his Statistics class experiment, researcher J. Gilbert decided to study how parents' income affects children's performance on standardized tests like the SAT. He proposed to collect information from a random sample of test takers and examine the relationship between parental income and SAT score. a) Is this an experiment? If not, what kind of study is it? b) If there is relationship between parental income and SAT score, why can't we conclude that differences in score are caused by differences in parental income?

A 2001 Danish study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine casts significant doubt on suggestions that adults who drink wine have higher levels of "good" cholesterol and fewer heart attacks. These researchers followed a group of individuals born at a Copenhagen hospital between 1959 and 1961 for 40 years. Their study found that in this group the adults who drank wine were richer and better educated than those who did not. a) What kind of study was this? b) It is generally true that people with high levels of education and high socioeconomic status are healthier than others. How does this call into question the supposed health benefits of wine? c) Can studies such as these prove causation (that wine helps prevent heart attacks, that drinking wine makes one richer, that being rich helps prevent heart attacks, etc.)? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.