/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Pollution A company with a fleet... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Pollution A company with a fleet of 150 cars found that the emissions systems of 7 out of the 22 they tested failed to meet pollution control guidelines. Is this strong evidence that more than \(20 \%\) of the fleet might be out of compliance? Test an appropriate hypothesis and state your conclusion. Be sure the appropriate assumptions and conditions are satisfied before you proceed.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Whether the fleet is out of compliance largely or not depends on the p-value. If the p-value is less than 0.05, there is strong evidence that more than 20% of the fleet might be out of compliance. Otherwise, there isn't statistically significant evidence to suggest that.

Step by step solution

01

Hypotheses formulation

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) is that \(20\%\) or fewer of the fleet might be out of compliance i.e., \(p=0.20\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_A\) is that more than \(20\%\) of the fleet might be out of compliance i.e., \(p > 0.20\).
02

Checking Conditions

Before proceeding, it's necessary to check if the conditions for carrying out the hypothesis test are met i.e., Random, Normal, and Independent.\n\na) Random: We’re assuming these cars were chosen in a way that every car had an equal chance to be selected.\nb) Normal: For this condition, we need \(\hat{p}n \geq 10\rightarrow0.20*22\geq10\) and \((1-\hat{p})n\geq 10\rightarrow0.80*22\geq10\).\nThis condition is satisfied.\nc) Independent: We are sampling without replacement, but we can assume independence since 22 cars are less than 10% of the total population of interests i.e., 150 cars. Thus, the condition is satisfied. In conclusion, we're okay to proceed with the Normal model.
03

Calculate Z-score

The next step is to calculate the Z-score which measures how many standard deviations the sample proportion is away from the null hypothesis proportion. The formula for the Z-score is \( Z = \frac{ \hat{p} - p} { \sqrt{\frac{p(1 - p)}{n}} }\). Here,\( \hat{p} = \frac{7}{22} \), \( p = 0.20 \), and \( n = 22 \). Plug these into the formula and calculate the value of Z.
04

Determine the p-value

The p-value is the probability of getting a z-score as extreme as the observed one, or more, assuming \(H_0\) is true. Use a Z-table or statistical software to find the p-value corresponding to the calculated Z-score. If the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
05

Interpretation

If the p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis i.e. there is strong evidence that more than \(20\%\) of the fleet might be out of compliance with pollution control guidelines. If not, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is the starting point for any hypothesis test. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference, that you want to challenge. In this exercise, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), is that 20% or fewer of the cars in the fleet fail to meet pollution control guidelines. This translates to the mathematical expression \(p = 0.20\). The null hypothesis is essentially a benchmark or baseline from which we measure deviation. It remains our assumption until evidence suggests otherwise. We usually retain the null hypothesis unless statistical analysis suggests significant evidence to the contrary.
Alternative Hypothesis
In contrast to the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis proposes a different outcome from the status quo. Here, our alternative hypothesis, represented as \(H_A\), is the claim that more than 20% of the cars might be non-compliant with pollution control requirements. Mathematically, it is expressed as \(p > 0.20\). The alternative hypothesis is what you are trying to provide evidence for through testing. When performing hypothesis testing, the goal is often to find evidence that supports this alternative hypothesis by rejecting the null hypothesis.
Z-score
The Z-score is a statistical measure that shows how far away our sample proportion is from the null hypothesis proportion, expressed in standard deviation units. To compute the Z-score, we use the formula:
\[ Z = \frac{ \hat{p} - p }{ \sqrt{\frac{p(1 - p)}{n}} } \]
Where:
  • \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion (i.e., the observed proportion of cars failing, which is \(\frac{7}{22}\)).
  • \(p\) is the null hypothesis proportion (0.20 in this case).
  • \(n\) is the sample size (22).
The computed Z-score helps us understand how extreme our sample result is. The larger the Z-score, the farther our observation is from the null hypothesis, indicating more substantial evidence to reject it.
P-value
The p-value is a crucial measure in hypothesis testing. It quantifies the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme as the one observed, given that the null hypothesis is true. In our scenario, a high p-value means that the observed sample result (or one more extreme) might occur under the null hypothesis. A low p-value, typically less than 0.05, suggests that the observed result is quite unlikely under the null hypothesis.
To find the p-value, one usually uses statistical tables or software to see where the observed Z-score lies on the standard normal distribution. A p-value below the chosen significance level (0.05 commonly) leads to rejecting the null hypothesis, indicating stronger evidence for the alternative hypothesis that more than 20% of the fleet fails to meet the guidelines.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Absentees The National Center for Education Statistics monitors many aspects of elementary and secondary education nationwide. Their 1996 numbers are often used as a baseline to assess changes. In \(1996,34 \%\) of students had not been absent from school even once during the previous month. In a 2000 survey, responses from 8302 students showed that this figure had slipped to \(33 \%\). Officials would, of course, be concerned if student attendance were declining. Do these figures give evidence of a change in student attendance? a. Write appropriate hypotheses. b. Check the assumptions and conditions. c. Perform the test and find the P-value. d. State your conclusion. e. Do you think this difference is meaningful? Explain.

In the 1980 s, it was generally believed that congenital abnormalities affected about \(5 \%\) of the nation's children. Some people believe that the increase in the number of chemicals in the environment has led to an increase in the incidence of abnormalities. A recent study examined 384 children and found that 46 of them showed signs of an abnormality. Is this strong evidence that the risk has increased? a. Write appropriate hypotheses. b. Check the necessary assumptions and conditions. c. Perform the mechanics of the test. What is the P- value? d. Explain carefully what the P-value means in context. e. What's your conclusion? f. Do environmental chemicals cause congenital abnormalities?

Empty houses According to the 2010 Census, \(11.4 \%\) of all housing units in the United States were vacant. A county supervisor wonders if her county is different from this. She randomly selects 850 housing units in her county and finds that 129 of the housing units are vacant. a. State the hypotheses. b. Name the model and check appropriate conditions for a hypothesis test. c. Draw and label a sketch, and then calculate the test statistic and P-value. d. State your conclusion.

Expensive medicine Developing a new drug can be an expensive process, resulting in high costs to patients. A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug to reduce cholesterol, and it will conduct a clinical trial to compare the effectiveness to the most widely used current treatment. The results will be analyzed using a hypothesis test. a. If the test yields a low P-value and the researcher rejects the null hypothesis that the new drug is not more effective, but it actually is not better, what are the consequences of such an error? b. If the test yields a high \(\mathrm{P}\) -value and the researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis, but the new drug is more effective, what are the consequences of such an error?

Marriage In \(1960,\) census results indicated that the age at which American men first married had a mean of 23.3 years. It is widely suspected that young people today are waiting longer to get married. We want to find out if the mean age of first marriage has increased since then. a. Write appropriate hypotheses. b. We plan to test our hypothesis by selecting a random sample of 40 men who married for the first time last year. Do you think the necessary assumptions for inference are satisfied? Explain. c. Describe the approximate sampling distribution model for the mean age in such samples. d. The men in our sample married at an average age of 24.2 years, with a standard deviation of 5.3 years.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.