/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 Disjoint or independent? In Exer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Disjoint or independent? In Exercise 40 ?, you calculated probabilities involving various blood types. Some of your answers depended on the assumption that the outcomes described were disjint; that is, they could not both happen at the same time. Other answers depended on the assumption that the events were independent; that is, the occurrence of one of them doesn't affect the probability of the other. Do you understand the difference between disjoint and independent? a. If you examine one person, are the events that the person is Type \(\mathrm{A}\) and that the same person is Type \(\mathrm{B}\) disjoint, independent, or neither? b. If you examine two people, are the events that the first is Type A and the second Type B disjoint, independent, or neither? c. Can disjoint events ever be independent? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The events that the person is Type A and that the same person is Type B are disjoint. \n b. If you examine two people, the events that the first is Type A and the second Type B are independent. \n c. Disjoint events cannot ever be independent.

Step by step solution

01

Analysis of the Event in a Person: Type A and Type B

Consider the two potential events, that the person is type A and that the same person is type B. It's important to understand that a person cannot have both blood types simultaneously - they either have type A or type B. Thus, these events are disjoint because they cannot occur at the same time.
02

Independence of Events in Two Different People

When we consider the events of the first person having blood type A and the second person having type B, remember that these are two different people. Whether the first person has type A does not affect whether the second has type B. These are independent events as the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of the other occurring.
03

Can Disjoint Events be Independent?

Disjoint and independent are two different concepts. Disjoint events can never occur at the same time, while independent events do not affect each other's outcomes. However, it's critical to note that disjoint events cannot be independent. If two events are disjoint (they cannot both occur), then the occurrence of one event means the other cannot happen, hence changing the probability of the other event (it becomes 0), thus, they are not independent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Disjoint Events
Understanding the concept of disjoint events is crucial for probability analysis. Disjoint events, also known as mutually exclusive events, are events that cannot occur simultaneously. For instance, when flipping a coin, the outcomes of getting 'heads' or 'tails' are disjoint events. Another example is when a single card is drawn from a standard deck; it cannot be both a 'heart' and a 'spade' at the same time.

In the context of blood types, consider the event where an individual's blood type is being identified. A person can only have one blood type; they cannot be both Type A and Type B. Therefore, the events of a person having Type A blood and Type B blood are clearly disjoint. This concept is essential in genetics and medical studies where each individual exhibits only one genotype for a particular trait at a time.
Independent Events
Independent events are another fundamental concept in probability. Two events are independent if the occurrence of one does not influence the likelihood of the occurrence of the other. A classic example of independent events is rolling two dice. The outcome of the first die does not affect the outcome of the second die; they are independent of each other.

Reflecting on our blood type scenario—if we examine two people to determine their blood types, the blood type of the first person is not affected by the blood type of the second person. Thus, these events are statistically regarded as independent. The principle of independent events helps to understand patterns of inheritance in genetics, such as the distribution of blood types across a population.
Probability Analysis
Probability analysis involves quantifying the likelihood of various events or outcomes. It plays a critical role in statistics, enabling us to make informed predictions and decisions based on the mathematical principles of probability. In the context of blood types, probability analysis can predict the distribution of blood types within a given population. For example, if the probability of a person having Type A blood is 0.3 and Type B is 0.1, one can use probability rules to estimate the frequencies of these blood types among multiple individuals.

To perform a reliable probability analysis, understanding and differentiating concepts like independent and disjoint events is essential. This distinction impacts the calculation of probabilities and the interpretation of results. Probability analysis is not limited to genetics; it spans numerous fields such as finance, healthcare, and engineering, where it's used to assess risks and outcomes.
Blood Types in Genetics
The study of blood types is a key application of probability in genetics. As humans, we can have one of four main blood types: A, B, AB, and O. These blood types are determined by the presence or absence of certain antigens on the surface of red blood cells. The inheritance of blood types follows simple Mendelian genetics, with certain types being dominant or recessive.

When applying probability to genetics, we often use Punnett squares or different probability rules to predict offspring blood types based on parental genotypes. In our textbook example, understanding the disjoint nature of having a specific blood type is crucial. It frames our approach to calculating probabilities and predicting inheritance patterns. As genetics becomes more complex with multiple traits and linkages, the principles of probability continue to guide us through the possibilities of inheritance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

College admissions For high school students graduating in 2013, college admissions to the nation's most selective schools were the most competitive in memory. Harvard accepted about \(5.8 \%\) of its applicants, Dartmouth \(10 \%,\) and Penn \(12.1 \%\). Jorge has applied to all three. Assuming that he's a typical applicant, he figures that his chances of getting into both Harvard and Dartmouth must be about \(0.58 \%\). a. How has he arrived at this conclusion? b. What additional assumption is he making? c. Do you agree with his conclusion?

Cold streak A basketball player missed 8 of 11 shots in the final portion of a game. When talking to reporters afterward, he says that he's not worried about his next game because he's due to make a lot of shots. Comment on his reasoning.

Pepsi For a sales promotion, the manufacturer places winning symbols under the caps of \(10 \%\) of all Pepsi bottles. You buy a six-pack. What is the probability that you win something?

Polling, part II According to Pew Research, the contact rate (probability of contacting a selected household) was \(90 \%\) in 1997 and \(62 \%\) in 2012 . However, the cooperation rate (probability of someone at the contacted household agreeing to be interviewed) was \(43 \%\) in 1997 and dropped to \(14 \%\) in \(2012 .\) a. What is the probability (in 2012 ) of obtaining an interview with the next household on the sample list? (To obtain an interview, an interviewer must both contact the household and then get agreement for the interview.) b. Was it more likely to obtain an interview from a randomly selected household in 1997 or in \(2012 ?\)

Religion Census reports for a city indicate that \(62 \%\) of residents classify themselves as Christian, \(12 \%\) as Jewish, and \(16 \%\) as members of other religions (Muslims, Buddhists, etc.). The remaining residents classify themselves as nonreligious. A polling organization seeking information about public opinions wants to be sure to talk with people holding a variety of religious views, and makes random phone calls. Among the first four people they call, what is the probability they reach a. all Christians? b. no Jews? c. at least one person who is nonreligious?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.