/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 In analyzing data from over 700 ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In analyzing data from over 700 games in the National Football League, economist David Romer identified 1068 fourth-down situations in which, based on his analysis, the right call would have been to go for it and not to punt. Nonetheless, in 959 of those situations, the teams punted. Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion of times NFL teams punt on a fourth down when, statistically speaking, they shouldn't be punting. \(^{6}\) Assume the sample is reasonably representative of all such fourth down situations in the NFL.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval is (0.880, 0.916). This implies that between 88% and 91.6% of the time, NFL teams tend to punt when, based on the statistical analysis, they should not.

Step by step solution

01

Define the problem variables

In this case, the number of successes, i.e., the times the teams unexpectedly decided to punt, is 959. The total number of trials, representing all the fourth-down situations, is 1068. Also, know that the Z score for 95% confidence is 1.96.
02

Find the sample proportion

The sample proportion (p̂) is found by dividing the number of successes by the total number of trials. Hence, p̂ = 959 / 1068 = 0.898.
03

Calculate the standard error

The standard error (SE) = sqrt[ p̂*(1-p̂) / n ] = sqrt[ 0.898*(1-0.898) / 1068 ] = 0.009.
04

Determine the confidence interval

The general formula for a confidence interval for a proportion is p̂ ± Z * SE. Substituting in known values, the interval is therefore: 0.898 ± 1.96*0.009 ≈ (0.880, 0.916).
05

Interpret the confidence interval

Based in this 95% confidence interval, between 88% and 91.6% of the time, given fourth-down situations, NFL teams should not punt. This shows a strong likelihood of teams punting when, statistically speaking, they should be going for it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Analysis
Understanding statistical analysis is crucial when evaluating actions and decisions in any data-driven context, including sports like the NFL. This process involves collecting and scrutinizing every piece of data to make informed conclusions. In the context of the exercise, the analysis focuses on determining the proportion of times NFL teams decided to punt on fourth down when statistics suggest they shouldn't have.

The study of these situations employs a statistical method known as a confidence interval, a type of estimate that gauges the precision of the sample proportion. Confidence intervals provide a range of values, which, with a certain level of confidence (95% in this case), is believed to capture the true population parameter. To construct a confidence interval, two main components are required: the sample proportion and the standard error. With these, analysts can extrapolate the data from the 1068 games sampled to make broader assertions about NFL decision-making habits.
NFL Decision Making
Decision-making in the NFL, especially on fourth downs, often intertwines with high-pressure situations and the complex strategies of the game. Coaches must weigh the risks and benefits of each available option, considering factors such as score, time remaining, and field position. Understanding the statistical implications of these decisions can be invaluable.

In the exercise, we see that empirical evidence from past games suggests a different approach to the conventional 'punt on fourth down' strategy. By using a rigorous statistical analysis, teams can potentially increase their chances of winning. However, NFL coaches might be influenced by tradition, risk aversion, or other non-statistical factors, which sometimes results in decision-making that deviates from what the statistical analysis recommends. Incorporating data-driven decisions can offer an edge, but it also requires a culture shift and acceptance of analytical insights in high-stakes environments.
Proportion Analysis
Proportion analysis is a fundamental aspect of statistical analysis, particularly when evaluating categorical data like the 'yes' or 'no' decision to punt the ball. It deals with the ratio of a particular outcome to the total number of observations or trials. In our example, the specific proportion is the number of times teams punted when they shouldn't have divided by the total number of situations examined.

Calculating the sample proportion (\( \text{p̂} \)) gives a snapshot of what happened in the observed cases, while computing the standard error (SE) accounts for variability and uncertainty in the sample. Both these statistics facilitate the calculation of the confidence interval. The interval assists in understanding not just the observed proportion but, more importantly, estimates the true proportion of such decisions if we could study the entire population of NFL fourth-down decisions. Proportion analysis thus underpins the broader field of inferential statistics, allowing analysts to make predictions and offer recommendations based on sampled data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. A study investigating the effect of exercise on brain activity recruits sets of identical twins in middle age, in which one twin is randomly assigned to engage in regular exercise and the other doesn't exercise.

Does Red Increase Men's Attraction to Women? Exercise 1.99 on page 44 described a study \(^{46}\) which examines the impact of the color red on how attractive men perceive women to be. In the study, men were randomly divided into two groups and were asked to rate the attractiveness of women on a scale of 1 (not at all attractive) to 9 (extremely attractive). Men in one group were shown pictures of women on a white background while the men in the other group were shown the same pictures of women on a red background. The results are shown in Table 6.14 and the data for both groups are reasonably symmetric with no outliers. To determine the possible effect size of the red background over the white, find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean attractiveness rating.

In Exercises 6.150 and \(6.151,\) use StatKey or other technology to generate a bootstrap distribution of sample differences in proportions and find the standard error for that distribution. Compare the result to the value obtained using the formula for the standard error of a difference in proportions from this section. Sample A has a count of 30 successes with \(n=100\) and Sample \(\mathrm{B}\) has a count of 50 successes with \(n=250\).

In Exercise \(6.107,\) we see that plastic microparticles are contaminating the world's shorelines and that much of the pollution appears to come from fibers from washing polyester clothes. The same study referenced in Exercise 6.107 also took samples from ocean beaches. Five samples were taken from each of 18 different shorelines worldwide, for a total of 90 samples of size \(250 \mathrm{~mL}\). The mean number of plastic microparticles found per \(250 \mathrm{~mL}\) of sediment was 18.3 with a standard deviation of 8.2 . (a) Find and interpret a \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the mean number of polyester microfibers per \(250 \mathrm{~mL}\) of beach sediment. (b) What is the margin of error? (c) If we want a margin of error of only ±1 with \(99 \%\) confidence, what sample size is needed?

Using Data 5.1 on page \(375,\) we find a significant difference in the proportion of fruit flies surviving after 13 days between those eating organic potatoes and those eating conventional (not organic) potatoes. Exercises 6.166 to 6.169 ask you to conduct a hypothesis test using additional data from this study. \(^{40}\) In every case, we are testing $$\begin{array}{ll}H_{0}: & p_{o}=p_{c} \\\H_{a}: & p_{o}>p_{c}\end{array}$$ where \(p_{o}\) and \(p_{c}\) represent the proportion of fruit flies alive at the end of the given time frame of those eating organic food and those eating conventional food, respectively. Also, in every case, we have \(n_{1}=n_{2}=500 .\) Show all remaining details in the test, using a \(5 \%\) significance level. Effect of Organic Raisins after 15 Days After 15 days, 320 of the 500 fruit flies eating organic raisins are still alive, while 300 of the 500 eating conventional raisins are still alive.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.