/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 To Study Effectively, Test Yours... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

To Study Effectively, Test Yourself! Cognitive science consistently shows that one of the most effective studying tools is to self-test. A recent study \(^{10}\) reinforced this finding. In the study, 118 college students studied 48 pairs of Swahili and English words. All students had an initial study time and then three blocks of practice time. During the practice time, half the students studied the words by reading them side by side, while the other half gave themselves quizees in which they were shown one word and had to recall its partner. Students were randomly assigned to the two groups, and total practice time was the same for both groups, On the final test one week later, the proportion of items correctly recalled was \(15 \%\) for the reading-study group and \(42 \%\) for the self-quiz group. The standard error for the difference in proportions is about 0.07 . Test whether giving self-quizzes is more effective and show all details of the test. The sample size is large enough to use the normal distribution.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The self-quizzing group is statistically significantly better than the reading group at recalling items as the z-score of 3.86 exceeds the critical value of 1.645. Therefore, we can reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the hypotheses

H0: The proportion of correct answers is the same in both groups. This can be expressed as P1 - P2 = 0, where P1 is the proportion for the reading group and P2 is the proportion for the self-quiz group. H1: The proportion of correct answers is greater in the self-quiz group. This can be expressed as P2 - P1 > 0
02

Calculate the test statistic

The z-statistic is computed by the formula: Z = (P2 - P1) / SE, where SE is the standard error of the difference. Substituting the given values, we get Z = (0.42 - 0.15) / 0.07 = 3.86.
03

Determine the critical value

Using a standard z-table with significance level of 0.05 (commonly used in these type tests) for a one-tailed test, the critical z-value is 1.645.
04

Make the decision

Since the calculated z-value (3.86) is greater than the critical z-value (1.645), we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the data supports the conclusion that the proportion of correct answers is greater in the self-quiz group.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cognitive Science
Cognitive science examines how people learn, remember, and understand. It combines insights from psychology, neuroscience, and education. One effective strategy supported by research in cognitive science is self-testing or retrieval practice.

When students test themselves, they retrieve information from their memory. This strengthens their memory and understanding, making it easier to recall the information later. Studies, like the one in the exercise, show significant improvements in learning when students use self-quizzes. Unlike passive study methods, such as rereading notes or textbooks, self-testing requires active engagement.

Self-testing not only boosts the ability to remember facts but also helps in applying knowledge to solve new problems. Therefore, incorporating regular self-tests in study routines can significantly enhance educational outcomes.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a method used to decide whether there is enough evidence to support a particular belief about a dataset. It starts with two hypotheses: the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)).

In the problem provided, the null hypothesis suggests no difference in effectiveness between the two study methods. It is stated as \(P_1 - P_2 = 0\). The alternative hypothesis posit that self-quizzing is more effective, \(P_2 - P_1 > 0\).

Testing involves computing a test statistic, such as the z-statistic in this case, which represents the difference between groups standardized by the standard error. If the calculated statistic falls beyond a critical value from a statistical table, like the z-table, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative. This structured approach ensures that conclusions are based on evidence rather than assumptions.
Educational Effectiveness
Educational effectiveness explores how different strategies enhance learning and achievement in students. It considers various teaching methods, study techniques, and learning environments.

In our study, effectiveness was measured by the proportion of correctly recalled word pairs one week later. The results showed a clear advantage for the self-quizzing group. With a recall rate of 42% compared to just 15% for the reading group, self-quizzing proved significantly more effective.

These insights emphasize the value of using interactive and engaging study methods. They promote better retention of information and develop critical thinking skills. Educators and students alike can benefit from adopting such proven strategies to achieve better educational outcomes.
Normal Distribution in Statistics
The normal distribution is a key concept in statistics. It describes a common, symmetrical spread of data in many natural and experimental contexts. Most data, when measured repeatedly, tend to cluster around the mean, forming a bell-shaped curve.

In the context of hypothesis testing, the normal distribution helps determine probabilities and z-scores. The sample size in the study was large enough to assume that the difference in proportions followed a normal distribution.

By using tables associated with the normal distribution, like the standard z-table, researchers can determine critical values. These values help to identify whether observed results are statistically significant or merely due to random chance. Understanding this distribution allows statisticians to make predictions and decisions about data confidently.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Incentives to Exercise: What Works Best? In the study described in Exercise \(5.29,\) the goal for each of the overweight participants in the study was to walk 7000 steps a day. The study lasted 100 days and the number of days that each participant met the goal was recorded. The participants were randomly assigned to one of four different incentive groups: for each day they met the goal, participants in the first group got only an acknowledgement, participants in the second group got entered into a lottery, and participants in the third group received cash (about \(\$ 1.50\) per day). In the fourth group, participants received all the money up front and lost money (about \(\$ 1.50\) per day) if they didn't meet the goal. The success rate was almost identical in the first three groups (in other words, giving cash did not work much better than just saying congratulations) and the mean number of days meeting the goal for these participants was 33.7 For the participants who would lose money, however, the mean number of days meeting the goal was \(45.0 .\) (People really hate to lose money!) Test to see if this provides evidence of a difference in means between those losing money and those with other types of incentives, using the fact that the standard error for the difference in means is 4.14 .

Exercises 5.7 to 5.12 include a set of hypotheses, some information from one or more samples, and a standard error from a randomization distribution. Find the value of the standardized \(z\) -test statistic in each situation. Test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) when the samples have \(n_{1}=n_{2}=50, \bar{x}_{1}=35,4, \bar{x}_{2}=33.1, s_{1}=\) 1.28 , and \(s_{2}=1.17\). The standard error of \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) from the randomization distribution is \(0.25 .\)

Effect of Organic Soybeans after 5 Days After 5 days, the proportion of fruit flies eating organic soybeans still alive is \(0.90,\) while the proportion still alive eating conventional soybeans is 0.84 . The standard error for the difference in proportions is 0.021 .

Lucky numbers If people choose lottery numbers at random, the last digit should be equally likely to be any of the ten digits from 0 to \(9 .\) Let \(p\) measure the proportion of choices that end with the digit 7\. If choices are random, we would expect \(p=0.10\), but if people have a special preference for numbers ending in 7 the proportion will be greater than 0.10 . Suppose that we test this by asking a random sample of 20 people to give a three-digit lottery number and find that four of the numbers have 7 as the last digit. Figure 5.13 shows a randomization distribution of proportions for 5000 simulated samples under the null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p=0.10\).(a) Use the sample proportion \(\hat{p}=0.20\) and a stan- (c) Compare the p-value obtained from the nordard error estimated from the randomization \(\quad\) mal distribution in part (b) to the p-value shown distribution to compute a standardized test \(\quad\) for the randomization distribution. Explain why statistic. \(\quad\) there might be a discrepancy between these two (b) Use the normal distribution to find a p-value for values. an upper tail alternative based on the test statistic found in part (a).

Incentives to Exercise: How Much More Effective Is It to Lose Money? In Exercise \(5.30,\) we see that overweight participants who lose money when they don't meet a specific exercise goal meet the goal more often, on average, than those who win money when they meet the goal, even if the final result is the same financially. In particular, participants who lost money met the goal for an average of 45.0 days (out of 100 ) while those winning money or receiving other incentives met the goal for an average of 33.7 days. In Exercise 5.30 we see that the incentive does make a difference. In this exercise, we ask how big the effect is between the two types of incentives. Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean number of days meeting the goal, between people who lose money when they don't meet the goal and those who win money or receive other similar incentives when they do meet the goal. The standard error for the difference in means from a bootstrap distribution is 4.14 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.