/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 178 Metal Tags on Penguins and Survi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Metal Tags on Penguins and Survival Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. One variable examined is the survival rate 10 years after tagging. The scientists observed that 10 of the 50 metal tagged penguins survived, compared to 18 of the 50 electronic tagged penguins. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion surviving between the metal and electronic tagged penguins \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right) .\) Interpret the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 90% confidence interval for the difference in survival rates between metal tagged and electronic tagged penguins is -27.7% to -4.3%. This means we are 90% confident that metal tagging reduces survival rates by between 4.3% and 27.7% compared to electronic tagging.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Proportions

Firstly, calculate the observed proportions. For the metal tagged penguins, the survival rate is 10 out of 50, thus \(p_{M}=10 / 50=0.20\). For the electronic tagged penguins, the survival rate is 18 out of 50, so \(p_{E}=18 / 50=0.36\). The difference between these two proportions is \(p_{M} - p_{E} = 0.20 - 0.36 = -0.16\).
02

Calculate the Standard Error

Then, calculate the Standard Error (SE) of the difference in proportions. The formula of SE is \(\sqrt{\left[\frac{p_{M}(1-p_{M})}{n_{M}}\right] + \left[\frac{p_{E}(1-p_{E})}{n_{E}}\right]}\) where \(n_{M}\) and \(n_{E}\) are the sample sizes of the metal and electronic tags respectively. Plugging the values, we have SE = \(\sqrt{\left[\frac{0.20(1 - 0.20)}{50}\right] + \left[\frac{0.36(1 - 0.36)}{50}\right]}\) = 0.071.
03

Determine the z-value

Next, determine the z-value for the required 90% confidence level. The 95% confidence level corresponds to a z-value of 1.645. In other words, for a normal distribution, about 90% of the area under the curve lies within 1.645 standard deviations from the mean.
04

Calculate the Confidence Interval

Now, calculate the confidence interval. The formula is \((p_{M} - p_{E}) - z * SE, (p_{M} - p_{E}) + z * SE\). Plugging in the values, we obtain confidence interval as \(-0.16 - 1.645 * 0.071, -0.16 + 1.645 * 0.071\), which is \(-0.277, -0.043\) or stated as \(-27.7\%, -4.3\%\).
05

Interpret the Result

Finally, interpret the result. The confidence interval \(-27.7\%, -4.3\%\) means we are 90% confident that the true difference in survival rates (metal tag - electronic tag) lies between -27.7% and -4.3%. Since the interval does not contain 0, this suggests there might be a statistically significant difference between the survival rates and that the metal tags could be having a detrimental effect on the penguin survival rate as compared to electronic tags.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Difference in Proportions
In studies comparing two groups, like in the penguin survival scenario, the difference in proportions helps us understand how one group fares relative to the other.
We calculate proportions using the ratio of successes (or events) in each group to the total in that group.
For the metal tagged penguins, the survival proportion is calculated as 10 survivors out of 50 total penguins, or \( p_M = \frac{10}{50} = 0.20 \).
Similarly, for electronic tagged penguins, the proportion is 18 out of 50, or \( p_E = \frac{18}{50} = 0.36 \).
Therefore, the difference in proportions \( p_M - p_E = 0.20 - 0.36 = -0.16 \).

This negative difference indicates metal tagged penguins have a lower survival rate compared to electronic tagged ones.
Understanding the difference in proportions is crucial because it shows the practical significance of the tags on survival rates.
Standard Error
The Standard Error (SE) is a statistical measure that provides an estimate of the accuracy of a sample proportion.
In this context, we use SE to measure the variability of the difference in proportions between the two groups of penguins.
The formula for SE for two proportions is:
\[ SE = \sqrt{\left[\frac{p_{M}(1-p_{M})}{n_{M}}\right] + \left[\frac{p_{E}(1-p_{E})}{n_{E}}\right]} \]
where \( n_M \) and \( n_E \) are the sample sizes for the metal and electronic tagged penguins, respectively.
By plugging in the values, \( p_M = 0.20 \), \( p_E = 0.36 \), \( n_M = 50 \), and \( n_E = 50 \), the SE is calculated as
\[ SE = \sqrt{\left[\frac{0.20 \times 0.80}{50}\right] + \left[\frac{0.36 \times 0.64}{50}\right]} = 0.071 \].

The standard error tells us how much the difference in proportions could vary if we repeated this experiment multiple times.
A smaller SE indicates more precise estimates.
Z-Value
The z-value is a critical value that represents the number of standard deviations a data point is from the mean of a distribution.
It is used to calculate confidence intervals by determining how wide the interval should be for a specified level of confidence.
In a normal distribution, certain z-values correspond to specific confidence levels.
For a 90% confidence interval, the z-value is typically 1.645.

This z-value means that 90% of data points fall within 1.645 standard deviations from the mean.
In our example, by using the z-value of 1.645 along with our Standard Error (SE), we construct the confidence interval for the difference in proportions.
The calculation is done using the formula:
\[ (p_M - p_E) \pm z \times SE \]
Plug in \( p_M - p_E = -0.16 \), \( z = 1.645 \), \( SE = 0.071 \), which gives us a confidence interval of \(-0.277, -0.043\).

This interval estimation tells us reliably where the true difference in proportions may lie with 90% confidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the mid-1990s a Nabisco marketing campaign claimed that there were at least 1000 chips in every bag of Chips Ahoy! cookies. A group of Air Force cadets collected a sample of 42 bags of Chips Ahoy! cookies, bought from locations all across the country, to verify this claim. \({ }^{41}\) The cookies were dissolved in water and the number of chips (any piece of chocolate) in each bag were hand counted by the cadets. The average number of chips per bag was \(1261.6,\) with standard deviation 117.6 chips. (a) Why were the cookies bought from locations all over the country? (b) Test whether the average number of chips per bag is greater than 1000 . Show all details. (c) Does part (b) confirm Nabisco's claim that every bag has at least 1000 chips? Why or why not?

Exercise B.5 on page 305 introduces a study examining the effect of diet cola consumption on calcium levels in women. A sample of 16 healthy women aged 18 to 40 were randomly assigned to drink 24 ounces of either diet cola or water. Their urine was collected for three hours after ingestion of the beverage and calcium excretion (in mg) was measured. The summary statistics for diet cola are \(\bar{x}_{C}=56.0\) with \(s_{C}=4.93\) and \(n_{C}=8\) and the summary statistics for water are \(\bar{x}_{W}=49.1\) with \(s_{W}=3.64\) and \(n_{W}=8\). Figure 6.26 shows dotplots of the data values. Test whether there is evidence that diet cola leaches calcium out of the system, which would increase the amount of calcium in the urine for diet cola drinkers. In Exercise B.5, we used a randomization distribution to conduct this test. Use a t-distribution here, after first checking that the conditions are met and explaining your reasoning. The data are stored in ColaCalcium.

Impact of Sample Size on Accuracy Compute the standard error for sample proportions from a population with proportion \(p=0.4\) for sample sizes of \(n=30, n=200,\) and \(n=1000 .\) What effect does increasing the sample size have on the standard error? Using this information about the effect on the standard error, discuss the effect of increasing the sample size on the accuracy of using a sample proportion to estimate a population proportion.

Use a t-distribution. Assume the samples are random samples from distributions that are reasonably normally distributed, and that a t-statistic will be used for inference about the difference in sample means. State the degrees of freedom used. Find the area in a t-distribution above 2.1 if the samples have sizes \(n_{1}=12\) and \(n_{2}=12\).

Professor A and Professor \(\mathrm{B}\) are teaching sections of the same introductory statistics course and decide to give common exams. They both have 25 students and design the exams to produce a grade distribution that follows a bell curve with mean \(\mu=75\) and standard deviation \(\sigma=10\) (a) Suppose students are randomly assigned to the two classes and the instructors are equally effective. Describe the center, spread, and shape of the distribution of the difference in class means, \(\bar{x}_{A}-\bar{x}_{B},\) for the common exams. (b) Based on the distribution in part (a), how often should one of the class means differ from the other class by three or more points? (Hint: Look at both the tails of the distribution.) (c) How do the answers to parts (a) and (b) change if the exams are much harder than expected so the distribution for each class is \(N(60,10)\) rather that \(N(75,10) ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.