/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 169 Light Roast or Dark Roast for Yo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Light Roast or Dark Roast for Your Coffee? A somewhat surprising fact about coffee is that the longer it is roasted, the less caffeine it has. Thus an "extra bold" dark roast coffee actually has less caffeine than a light roast coffee. What is the explanatory variable and what is the response variable? Do the two variables have a negative association or a positive association?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The explanatory variable is the 'level of roasting' and the response variable is 'caffeine content'. The association between these two variables is negative as an increase in the level of roasting (from light to dark roast) leads to a decrease in the caffeine content.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Explanatory Variable

The explanatory variable is the factor that is manipulated or controlled in an experiment. Here, the variable that is manipulated is the duration for which the coffee is roasted. So, the explanatory variable is the 'level of roasting'.
02

Identify the Response Variable

The response variable is the factor that we measure or observe in an experiment. Here, the factor we are observing is the 'caffeine content' in the coffee. Therefore, the response variable is 'caffeine content'.
03

Determine the Association between the Variables

In this scenario, as the level of roasting increases (from light roast to dark roast), the caffeine content decreases. Therefore, there is a negative association between the two variables. In other words, as one variable increases, the other decreases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Explanatory Variable
In the world of statistics and experimental design, the explanatory variable, also known as the independent variable, is the one that's manipulated by the researcher to observe its effect on another variable. Imagine you're a scientist conducting an experiment. You're like a chef tweaking a recipe to see what happens, right? Well, that ingredient you're changing – that's your explanatory variable. In the case of our coffee conundrum, the 'level of roasting' is the explanatory variable. This is because we control how much we roast the coffee beans and want to see how this 'cooking time' affects the amount of kick—the caffeine—in your cuppa.

So, whenever you're sipping on that steamy mug of coffee and pondering about the strength of its effects, remember that the duration of roasting is the unseen hand that might determine whether your coffee gives you a nudge or a jolt to start your day!
Response Variable
On the flip side, hailing from the outcome end of the experiment, we find the response variable, also known as the dependent variable. This is what changes as a result of the explanatory variable's influence. It’s the effect to the cause or the outcome of our scientific chef’s experiment. In our coffee example, the 'caffeine content' is the response variable. The caffeine level is not something we directly manipulate; instead, it responds to how much those coffee beans are roasted.

Let's say you have two batches of beans – one light, one dark - the amount of caffeine that dances into your brew and potentially energises your day is the result of how long those beans were twirling in the roaster. Remember, when you're marking experiments or analysing data, the response variable is what you measure – not what you tweak.
Negative Association
Diving deeper into our analytical journey, we encounter associations. An association is a relationship between two variables. When we talk about a 'negative association,' we're unravelling the story of two variables moving in opposition to each other. As one goes up, the other takes a dive. It's like a seesaw: one end goes up, the other comes down.

In the tale of roasting time and caffeine content, we have a classic example of a negative association. As the level of roasting increases, meaning our beans are turning darker and more bold in flavor, our once mighty caffeine content starts to shy away, decreasing with each passing moment in the roaster. Just picture it: more roasting equals less caffeine. So, the next time you're studying for that big exam and reach for a coffee, remember that a 'lighter' choice might actually be the heavier hitter in the caffeine department!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Each describe a sample. The information given includes the five number summary, the sample size, and the largest and smallest data values in the tails of the distribution. In each case: (a) Clearly identify any outliers. (b) Draw a boxplot. Five number summary: (15,42,52,56,71)\(;\) \(n=120\) Tails: \(15,20,28,30,31, \ldots, 64,65,65,66,71\)

In Exercises 2.39 to \(2.42,\) draw any dotplot to show a dataset that is Clearly skewed to the left

According to the \(95 \%\) rule, the largest value in a sample from a distribution which is approximately symmetric and bell-shaped should be between 2 and 3 standard deviations above the mean, while the smallest value should be between 2 and 3 standard deviations below the mean. Thus the range should be roughly 4 to 6 times the standard deviation. As a rough rule of thumb, we can get a quick estimate of the standard deviation for a bell-shaped distribution by dividing the range by \(5 .\) Check how well this quick estimate works in the following situations. (a) Pulse rates from the StudentSurvey dataset discussed in Example 2.17 on page \(77 .\) The five number summary of pulse rates is \((35,62,70,\) 78,130) and the standard deviation is \(s=12.2\) bpm. Find the rough estimate using all the data, and then excluding the two outliers at 120 and \(130,\) which leaves the maximum at 96 . (b) Number of hours a week spent exercising from the StudentSurvey dataset discussed in Example 2.21 on page 81 . The five number summary of this dataset is (0,5,8,12,40) and the standard deviation is \(s=5.741\) hours. (c) Longevity of mammals from the MammalLongevity dataset discussed in Example 2.22 on page 82 . The five number summary of the longevity values is (1,8,12,16,40) and the standard deviation is \(s=7.24\) years.

Scientists are working to train dogs to smell cancer, including early stage cancer that might not be detected with other means. In previous studies, dogs have been able to distinguish the smell of bladder cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer. Now, it appears that a dog in Japan has been trained to smell bowel cancer. \({ }^{12}\) Researchers collected breath and stool samples from patients with bowel cancer as well as from healthy people. The dog was given five samples in each test, one from a patient with cancer and four from healthy volunteers. The dog correctly selected the cancer sample in 33 out of 36 breath tests and in 37 out of 38 stool tests. (a) The cases in this study are the individual tests. What are the variables? (b) Make a two-way table displaying the results of the study. Include the totals. (c) What proportion of the breath samples did the dog get correct? What proportion of the stool samples did the dog get correct? (d) Of all the tests the \(\operatorname{dog}\) got correct, what proportion were stool tests?

Arsenic is toxic to humans, and people can be exposed to it through contaminated drinking water, food, dust, and soil. Scientists have devised an interesting new way to measure a person's level of arsenic poisoning: by examining toenail clippings. In a recent study, \({ }^{29}\) scientists measured the level of arsenic (in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg}\) ) in toenail clippings of eight people who lived near a former arsenic mine in Great Britain. The following levels were recorded: \(\begin{array}{ll}0.8 & 1.9\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{llll}3.9 & 7.1 & 11.9 & 26.0\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{ll}2.7 & 3.4\end{array}\) (a) Do you expect the mean or the median of these toenail arsenic levels to be larger? Why? (b) Calculate the mean and the median.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.