/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 Obtain as much information as yo... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Obtain as much information as you can about the \(P\) -value for an upper-tailed \(F\) test in each of the following situations: a. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=3, \mathrm{df}_{2}=15,\) calculated \(F=4.23\) b. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=18,\) calculated \(F=1.95\) c. \(\quad \mathrm{df}_{1}=5, \mathrm{df}_{2}=20,\) calculated \(F=4.10\) d. \(\mathrm{df}_{1}=4, \mathrm{df}_{2}=35,\) calculated \(F=4.58\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
P-values will vary according to the F distribution table used. If the calculated F value falls beyond the critical F value in the table, we infer that P-value is less than the level of significance used to look up the critical F value. If our calculated F value is less than the critical F value in the table, then we infer that our P value is greater than the level of significance used to look up the critical F value. Without the actual F distribution table, it is not possible to give a specific P-value estimate.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the F distribution

This step involves understanding that the F distribution is skewed to the right, and not symmetrical. Its shape depends on the degrees of freedom, so it differs from situation to situation. There are F distribution tables that show the critical value for different alpha levels and different degrees of freedom.
02

Locate critical value in the table

For each of the scenarios, the F distribution table must be consulted to find the P-value. From the table, identify the row corresponding to \(df_1\) and the column indexed by \(df_2\). The location where the row and column intersect is the critical value of the F distribution, denoted \(F_{crit}\).
03

Calculate P-value

From the table value obtained in step 2, determine if the calculated F value is greater or less than the critical value \(F_{crit}\). If the computed F value is greater than \(F_{crit}\), this suggests that the calculated p-value is less than the level of significance used to look up \(F_{crit}\). If the computed F is less than \(F_{crit}\), then the p-value is greater than the level of significance used. Note not all F distribution tables show actual probability (P-value), however using the method mentioned can give an estimate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

F Distribution
The F distribution is a probability distribution that appears in analysis of variance (ANOVA) and tests of equality of variances. One key feature of the F distribution is that it is not symmetrical—it is skewed to the right. This means there is a longer tail on the right side, affecting how values are distributed across the range.

The shape of the F distribution is determined by two different types of "degrees of freedom" which are associated with the numerator and the denominator in the F-test calculations. Because of this, the curve can vary greatly based on the context of the data being analyzed. It can be helpful to visualize the F distribution as a family of curves that change shape depending on these degrees of freedom. Understanding the unique characteristics of the F distribution helps us interpret statistical tests effectively, especially as it is used to compare two variability sources in the context of hypothesis testing.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) are integral to understanding the F distribution and its behavior. In an F-test, degrees of freedom are specified in two ways: one for the numerator (df1) and one for the denominator (df2).

Essentially, degrees of freedom refer to the number of independent values or quantities available to estimate another statistic or parameter. They play a crucial role in determining how spread out the F distribution is. For example:
  • High degrees of freedom in the numerator result in a less peaked distribution.
  • High degrees of freedom in the denominator make the distribution closer to normal.

Degrees of freedom arise from the sample sizes and the structure of the data, impacting both the critical value from the F distribution and the interpretation of statistical tests.
Critical Value
The critical value is a point on the scale of the test statistic beyond which we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. For F-tests, critical values are extracted from F distribution tables based on the selected significance level and degrees of freedom.

Critical values serve as a threshold to decide if our sample data indicates a significant effect or not. Let's break down the process of finding a critical value:
  • First, identify the significance level (usually denoted by \( \alpha \), such as 0.05 or 5%).
  • Next, locate the row for the numerator degrees of freedom (df1) in the F distribution table, and a column for the denominator degrees of freedom (df2).
  • The point where these intersect provides the critical value \( F_{crit} \).

If the calculated F statistic from a test exceeds this critical value, we may conclude that there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis, showing that a significant difference or effect exists.
Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, the significance level is a threshold risk we are willing to take of incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis, this is often represented by \( \alpha \). Common significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10, meaning 5%, 1%, or 10% risk respectively.

The significance level is chosen by the researcher before the test begins and is crucial because it influences the critical value extracted from the F distribution table. This level decides the **stringency** of the test:
  • A lower significance level (e.g., 0.01) means stricter testing criteria, reducing the probability of false positives.
  • A higher significance level (e.g., 0.10) allows for more false positives, increasing the chance of detecting a true effect when one exists.

Understanding the significance level helps explain how and why we decide to reject or not reject the null hypothesis during statistical testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper “Predicting Yolk Height, Yolk Width, Albumen Length, Eggshell Weight, Egg Shape Index, Eggshell Thickness, Egg Surface Area of Japanese Quails Using Various Egg Traits as Regressors" (International Journal of Poultry Science [2008]: 85-88) used a multiple regression model with two independent variables where $$ \begin{aligned} y &=\text { quail egg weight }(\mathrm{g}) \\ x_{1} &=\text { egg width }(\mathrm{mm}) \\ x_{2} &=\text { egg length }(\mathrm{mm}) \end{aligned} $$ The regression function suggested in the paper is \(-21.658+0.828 x_{1}+0.373 x_{2}\) a. What is the mean egg weight for quail eggs that have a width of \(20 \mathrm{~mm}\) and a length of \(50 \mathrm{~mm}\) ? b. Interpret the values of \(\beta_{1}\) and \(\beta_{2}\).

According to “Assessing the Validity of the Post-Materialism Index" (American Political Science Review [1999]: \(649-664\) ), one may be able to predict an individual's level of support for ecology based on demographic and ideological characteristics. The multiple regression model proposed by the authors was $$ \begin{aligned} y=& 3.60-.01 x_{1}+.01 x_{2}-.07 x_{3}+.12 x_{4}+.02 x_{5} \\ &-.04 x_{6}-.01 x_{7}-.04 x_{8}-.02 x_{9}+e \end{aligned} $$ where the variables are defined as follows: \(y=\) ecology score (higher values indicate a greater concern for ecology) \(x_{1}=\) age times 10 \(x_{2}=\) income (in thousands of dollars) \(x_{3}=\) gender \((1=\) male \(, 0=\) female \()\) \(x_{4}=\operatorname{race}(1=\) white \(, 0=\) nonwhite \()\) \(x_{5}=\) education (in years) \(x_{6}=\) ideology \((4=\) conservative, \(3=\) right of center, \(2=\) middle of the road, \(1=\) left of center, and \(0=\) liberal) \(\begin{aligned} x_{7}=& \text { social class }(4=\text { upper, } 3=\text { upper middle, }\\\ & 2=\text { middle }, 1=\text { lower middle, and } \\ &0=\text { lower }) \end{aligned}\) \(x_{8}=\) postmaterialist ( 1 if postmaterialist, 0 otherwise) \(x_{9}=\) materialist (1 if materialist, 0 otherwise) a. Suppose you knew a person with the following characteristics: a 25 -year- old, white female with a college degree (16 years of education), who has a \(\$ 32,000\) -peryear job, is from the upper middle class, and considers herself left of center, but who is neither a materialist nor a postmaterialist. Predict her ecology score. b. If the woman described in Part (a) were Hispanic rather than white, how would the prediction change? c. Given that the other variables are the same, what is the estimated mean difference in ecology score for men and women? d. How would you interpret the coefficient of \(x_{2}\) ? e. Comment on the numerical coding of the ideology and social class variables. Can you suggest a better way of incorporating these two variables into the model?

The ability of ecologists to identify regions of greatest species richness could have an impact on the preservation of genetic diversity, a major objective of the World Conservation Strategy. The article “Prediction of Rarities from Habitat Variables: Coastal Plain Plants on Nova Scotian Lakeshores" (Ecology [1992]: \(1852-\) 1859) used a sample of \(n=37\) lakes to obtain the estimated regression equation $$ \begin{aligned} \hat{y}=& 3.89+.033 x_{1}+.024 x_{2}+.023 x_{3} \\ &+.008 x_{4}-.13 x_{5}-.72 x_{6} \end{aligned} $$ where \(y=\) species richness, \(x_{1}=\) watershed area, \(x_{2}=\) shore width, \(x_{3}=\) drainage \((\%), x_{4}=\) water color \((\) total color units), \(x_{5}=\) sand \((\%),\) and \(x_{6}=\) alkalinity. The coefficient of multiple determination was reported as \(R^{2}=.83 .\) Use a test with significance level .01 to decide whether the chosen model is useful.

A manufacturer of wood stoves collected data on \(y=\) particulate matter concentration and \(x_{1}=\) flue temperature for three different air intake settings (low, medium, and high). a. Write a model equation that includes indicator variables to incorporate intake setting, and interpret each of the \(\beta\) coefficients. b. What additional predictors would be needed to incorporate interaction between temperature and intake setting?

A number of investigations have focused on the problem of assessing loads that can be manually handled in a safe manner. The article "Anthropometric, Muscle Strength, and Spinal Mobility Characteristics as Predictors in the Rating of Acceptable Loads in Parcel Sorting" (Ergonomics [1992]: \(1033-1044\) ) proposed using a regression model to relate the dependent variable \(y=\) individual's rating of acceptable load \((\mathrm{kg})\) to \(k=3\) independent (predictor) variables: \(x_{1}=\) extent of left lateral bending \((\mathrm{cm})\) \(x_{2}=\) dynamic hand grip endurance (seconds) $$ x_{3}=\text { trunk extension ratio }(\mathrm{N} / \mathrm{kg}) $$ Suppose that the model equation is $$ \begin{array}{l} y=30+.90 x_{1}+.08 x_{2}-4.50 x_{3}+e \\ \text { and that } \sigma=5 \end{array} $$ a. What is the population regression function? b. What are the values of the population regression coefficients? c. Interpret the value of \(\beta_{1}\). d. Interpret the value of \(\beta_{3}\). e. What is the mean rating of acceptable load when extent of left lateral bending is \(25 \mathrm{~cm}\), dynamic hand grip endurance is 200 seconds, and trunk extension ratio is \(10 \mathrm{~N} / \mathrm{kg}\) ? f. If repeated observations on rating are made on different individuals, all of whom have the values of \(x_{1}\), \(x_{2},\) and \(x_{3}\) specified in Part (e), in the long run approximately what percentage of ratings will be between \(13.5 \mathrm{~kg}\) and \(33.5 \mathrm{~kg}\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.