/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Do taller adults make more money... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Do taller adults make more money? The authors of the paper "Stature and Status: Height, Ability, and Labor Market Outcomes" (Journal of Political Economics [2008] : \(499-532\) ) investigated the association between height and earnings. They used the simple linear regression model to describe the relationship between \(x=\) height (in inches) and \(y=\log (\) weekly gross earnings in dollars) in a very large sample of men. The logarithm of weekly gross earnings was used because this transformation resulted in a relationship that was approximately linear. The paper reported that the slope of the estimated regression line was \(b=0.023\) and the standard deviation of \(b\) was \(s_{b}=0.004\). Carry out a hypothesis test to decide if there is convincing evidence of a useful linear relationship between height and the logarithm of weekly earnings. Assume that the basic assumptions of the simple linear regression model are reasonably met.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The p-value for this test is very close to zero, which is less than 0.05. Thus, there is convincing evidence against the null hypothesis. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is a significant linear relationship between adults' height and the logarithm of their weekly earnings.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_{0}\)): There is no linear relationship between adults' height and the logarithm of their weekly earnings, which means that the slope of the regression line \(b = 0\). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_{1}\)): There is a significant linear relationship between adults' height and the logarithm of their weekly earnings, meaning that the slope of the regression line \(b\neq 0\).
02

Calculate Test Statistic

The test statistic for this hypothesis test is calculated as follows: \(t = \frac{b - 0}{s_{b}}\). Using given values, \(t = \frac{0.023 - 0}{0.004} = 5.75\). So, the test statistic is approximately 5.75.
03

Determine p-value

The p-value is the probability of obtaining the observed data or more extreme data assuming the null hypothesis is true. Given the sample size here is very large, it can safely be assumed that the sampling distribution of the slope is approximately normally distributed. Hence, a Z table or standard statistical software can be used to find the p-value. Generally, a p-value less than 0.05 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis. In this case, a t-value of 5.75 is very extreme and the corresponding p-value will be virtually zero, providing very strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a fundamental concept in statistical hypothesis testing, signifying no effect or no relationship between variables. In the context of simple linear regression, the null hypothesis (\text{H}_0) posits that there is no linear relationship between the independent variable (in this case, height) and the dependent variable (log of weekly earnings). Formally, it states that the slope of the regression line, denoted as \(b\), is equal to zero.

If, after conducting the appropriate tests, we find that data does not provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, we would conclude that height has no effect on earnings. It is essential to note that not rejecting \text{H}_0 does not prove it's true but merely indicates insufficient evidence to conclude a relationship exists.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis contrasts the null hypothesis by suggesting that a particular effect or relationship does exist. For our example of regression involving height and earnings, the alternative hypothesis (\text{H}_1) asserts that there is, in fact, a significant linear relationship between the two. It indicates that the slope of the regression line \(b\) is not equal to zero.

This hypothesis encapsulates our research question - are taller adults likely to earn more? If our tests lead us to reject the null hypothesis, this is the claim we are left to consider. However, we always test the null hypothesis, not the alternative, and any rejection must be based on sufficient statistical evidence.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a crucial part of the hypothesis testing process used to determine the likelihood that the null hypothesis can be rejected. It's calculated from sample data and used to make a decision about the hypotheses. In simple linear regression, the test statistic for evaluating the slope is typically a t-value computed as \(t = \frac{b - 0}{s_b}\), where \(b\) is the estimated slope from the sample and \(s_b\) is the standard deviation.

In our exercise, the test statistic value of approximately 5.75 was calculated using the provided slope and standard deviation. This value is what we will compare against a critical value or use to find a p-value to assess the validity of the null hypothesis.
P-value
The p-value is a fundamental value which tells us how extreme the observed results are, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. It essentially allows us to determine the significance of our test statistic. If the p-value is less than our chosen significance level (usually 0.05), we have grounds to reject the null hypothesis.

In our regression example, the test statistic was found to be quite high, indicating that the slope is quite different from zero, and therefore, the p-value will be very low. A low p-value, as mentioned, suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis, implying that the slope is significant, and there likely is a linear relationship between height and the logarithm of weekly earnings.
Linear Relationship
A linear relationship in regression analysis is one where the change in the dependent variable is directly proportional to the change in the independent variable. In simple terms, if we were to plot the relationship between height and log weekly earnings on a graph with a line of best fit if the line slopes upwards or downwards instead of being flat, we're observing a linear relationship.

The strength and direction of this relationship are quantified by the slope (\(b\)) of this line. A nonzero slope suggests a linear relationship exists. In our exercise, we're investigating whether an increase in height is associated with an increase in earnings, which would translate to a positive slope.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the accompanying data on \(x=\) research and development expenditure (thousands of dollars) and \(y=\) growth rate (\% per year) for eight different industries. \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}x & 2024 & 5038 & 905 & 3572 & 1157 & 327 & 378 & 191 \\ y & 1.90 & 3.96 & 2.44 & 0.88 & 0.37 & -0.90 & 0.49 & 1.01\end{array}\) a. Would a simple linear regression model provide useful information for predicting growth rate from research and development expenditure? Use a .05 level of significance. b. Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the average change in growth rate associated with a \(\$ 1000\) increase in expenditure. Interpret the resulting interval.

Exercise 13.16 described a regression analysis in which \(y=\) sales revenue and \(x=\) advertising expenditure. Summary quantities given there yield \(n=15 \quad b=52.27 \quad s_{b}=8.05\) a. Test the hypothesis \(H_{0}: \beta=0\) versus \(H_{x}: \beta \neq 0\) using a significance level of .05. What does your conclusion say about the nature of the relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) ? b. Consider the hypothesis \(H_{0}: \beta=40\) versus \(H_{A} \cdot \beta>\) 40\. The null hypothesis states that the average change in sales revenue associated with a 1 -unit increase in advertising expenditure is (at most) \(\$ 40,000\). Carry out a test using significance level .01 .

The paper "Predicting Yolk Height, Yolk Width. Albumen Length, Eggshell Weight, Egg Shape Index, Eggshell Thickness, Egg Surface Area of Japanese Quails Using Various Egg Traits as Regressors" ternational journal of Poultry Science [2008]\(: 85-88)\) suggests that the simple linear regression model is reasonable for describing the relationship between \(y=\) eggshell thickness (in micrometers) and \(x=\) egg length \((\mathrm{mm})\) for quail eggs. Suppose that the population regression line is \(y=0.135+0.003 x\) and that \(\sigma=0.005 .\) Then, for a fixed \(x\) value, \(y\) has a normal distribution with mean \(0.135+0.003 x\) and standard deviation \(0.005 .\) a. What is the mean eggshell thickness for quail eggs that are \(15 \mathrm{~mm}\) in length? For quail eggs that are \(17 \mathrm{~mm}\) in length? b. What is the probability that a quail egg with a length of \(15 \mathrm{~mm}\) will have a shell thickness that is greater than \(0.18 \mu \mathrm{m}\) ? c. Approximately what proportion of quail eggs of length \(14 \mathrm{~mm}\) has a shell thickness of greater than .175? Less than .178 ?

A sample of \(n=61\) penguin burrows was selected, and values of both \(y=\) trail length \((\mathrm{m})\) and \(x=\) soil hardness (force required to penetrate the substrate to a depth of \(12 \mathrm{~cm}\) with a certain gauge, in \(\mathrm{kg}\) ) were determined for each one ("Effects of Substrate on the Distribution of Magellanic Penguin Burrows," The Auk [1991]: \(923-933\) ). The equation of the least-squares line was \(\hat{y}=11.607-1.4187 x,\) and \(r^{2}=.386 .\) a. Does the relationship between soil hardness and trail length appear to be linear, with shorter trails associated with harder soil (as the article asserted)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses. b. Using \(s_{\mathrm{e}}=2.35, \bar{x}=4.5,\) and \(\sum(x-\bar{x})^{2}=250,\) predict trail length when soil hardness is 6.0 in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the prediction. c. Would you use the simple linear regression model to predict trail length when hardness is \(10.0 ?\) Explain your reasoning

The figure at the top of the page is based on data from the article "Root and Shoot Competition Intensity Along a Soil Depth Gradient" (Ecology [1995] : \(673-682)\). It shows the relationship between aboveground biomass and soil depth within the experimental plots. The relationship is described by the estimated regression equation: biomass \(=-9.85+25.29(\) soil depth \()\) and \(r^{2}=.65 ; P<0.001 ; n=55 .\) Do you think the simple linear regression model is appropriate here? Explain. What would you expect to see in a plot of the standardized residuals versus \(x\) ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.