/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 The report "Young People Living ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The report "Young People Living on the Edge" (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 2008 ) summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 600 young adults (age 19 to 35 ) and the other sample consisted of 300 parents of children age 19 to \(35 .\) The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support to their child in that situation. a. When asked about getting married, \(41 \%\) of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and \(43 \%\) of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different. b. The report stated that the proportion of young adults who thought parents would help with buying a house or apartment was .37. For the sample of parents, the proportion who said they would help with buying a house or an apartment was . \(27 .\) Based on these data, can you conclude that the proportion of parents who say they would help with buying a house or an apartment is significantly less than the proportion of young adults who think that their parents would help?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. There isn't sufficient evidence at the 0.05 significance level to say that the proportion of young adults who think parents would provide financial support for getting married and the proportion of parents who say they would provide such support are different.\n b. There's evidence at the 0.05 significance level to conclude that the proportion of parents who say they would help with buying a house or an apartment is significantly less than the proportion of young adults who think their parents would help.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the Hypotheses

For both parts (a) and (b), the first step is to set up the null and the alternative hypotheses which will guide the problem-solving process. For part (a), the null hypothesis (H0) is that there's no difference in the proportions, i.e., the proportion of young adults who think their parents would provide support equals the proportion of parents who would provide support. The alternative hypothesis (HA) is that the proportions are different. Similarly, for (b), the null hypothesis is that the proportion of parents who say they would help is equal to the proportion of young adults who think they would help, while the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of parents who say they would help is less than the proportion of young adults.
02

Compute the Test Statistic and the P-value

Next, calculate the test statistic. Using the given sample sizes and proportions, compute the pooled proportion and then the test statistic using the appropriate formula. Once you have the test statistic, you can determine the p-value using a standard normal distribution (Z-distribution) for both parts (a) and (b).
03

Conclude the Hypothesis Test

Compare the p-values to the significance level \(\alpha = 0.05\). If the p-value is less than \(\alpha\), reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than or equal to \(\alpha\), do not reject the null hypothesis. From the p-values, draw conclusions about the results in terms of the original questions asked in the exercise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is an essential concept in hypothesis testing. It is a statement that assumes no effect or no difference in the population. In the context of the given exercise, the null hypothesis for part (a) posits that there is no difference between the proportion of young adults who think their parents would provide financial support for getting married and the proportion of parents who say they would provide such support. This hypothesis is symbolically represented as \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \), where \( p_1 \) is the proportion of young adults and \( p_2 \) is the proportion of parents.

For part (b), the null hypothesis suggests that the proportion of parents who say they would help with buying a house equals the proportion of young adults who think they would receive help, represented as \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \).

When conducting hypothesis tests, the null hypothesis often serves as the baseline assumption. The goal is to determine if there is enough evidence to reject it, suggesting something significant or different is occurring.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis stands in contrast to the null hypothesis. It proposes that there is a meaningful difference or effect. In hypothesis testing, this hypothesis is what researchers aim to support.

In part (a) of the exercise, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the proportions differ, which is expressed as \( H_A: p_1 eq p_2 \). This suggests that the viewpoint of young adults about parental support and the parents' own beliefs about their support are divergent.

Meanwhile, for part (b), the alternative hypothesis is specifically that the parents' willingness to help with housing is less than what the young adults perceive. Symbolically, this is represented as \( H_A: p_1 > p_2 \).

The alternative hypothesis is crucial because hypothesis tests aim to determine if there is sufficient evidence to favor this hypothesis over the null. It is the statement of change or difference that researchers seek evidence for.
P-value
The p-value in hypothesis testing is a measure of the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. It quantifies the probability of observing the test results, or something more extreme, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

Consider the exercise; once we calculate the test statistic, the p-value helps us determine whether the difference in proportions is statistically significant. A small p-value indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis. Typically, a significance level \( \alpha \) such as 0.05, is used.

- If the p-value is less than \( \alpha \), we reject the null hypothesis.
- If the p-value is greater than or equal to \( \alpha \), we fail to reject it.

In parts (a) and (b) of the example, the calculations of p-values guide us in deciding if the perceived differences in support between young adults and their parents are significant. The smaller this value, the stronger the case for the alternative hypothesis.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a crucial component of hypothesis testing. It is a standardized value that helps you determine the position of your sample result relative to the null hypothesis. For comparing two proportions, like in the exercise, the test statistic typically follows a Z-distribution.

To find the test statistic, you first need to calculate the pooled proportion. This is done by combining the successes from both samples and dividing by the total number of observations. The test statistic is then calculated using the formula:
\[ Z = \frac{(\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2)}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2})}} \]
where \( \hat{p}_1 \) and \( \hat{p}_2 \) are the sample proportions, \( \hat{p} \) is the pooled proportion, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes.

The calculated Z-value indicates how far, in standard deviations, the observed difference is from the null hypothesis assumption. By comparing this value to a critical value from the Z-distribution, or by calculating the p-value, we decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "The Truth About Lying in Online Dating Profiles" (Proceedings, Computer-Human Interactions [2007]\(: 1-4)\) describes an investigation in which 40 men and 40 women with online dating profiles agreed to participate in a study. Each participant's height (in inches) was measured and the actual height was compared to the height given in that person's online profile. The differences between the online profile height and the actual height (profile - actual) were used to compute the values in the accompanying table. $$ \begin{array}{ll} \text { Men } & \text { Women } \\ \hline \bar{x}_{d}=0.57 & \bar{x}_{d}=0.03 \\ s_{d}=0.81 & s_{d}=0.75 \\ n=40 & n=40 \end{array} $$ For purposes of this exercise, assume it is reasonable to regard the two samples in this study as being representative of male online daters and female online daters. (Although the authors of the paper believed that their samples were representative of these populations, participants were volunteers recruited through newspaper advertisements, so we should be a bit hesitant to generalize results to all online daters!) a. Use the paired \(t\) test to determine if there is convincing evidence that, on average, male online daters overstate their height in online dating profiles. Use \(\alpha=.05\) b. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the mean online dating profile height and mean actual height for female online daters. c. Use the two-sample \(t\) test of Section 11.1 to test \(H_{0}: \mu_{m}-\mu_{f}=0\) versus \(H_{a}: \mu_{m}-\mu_{f}>0,\) where \(\mu_{m}\) is the mean height difference (profile - actual) for male online daters and \(\mu_{f}\) is the mean height difference (profile - actual) for female online daters. d. Explain why a paired \(t\) test was used in Part (a) but a two-sample \(t\) test was used in Part (c).

The article "Portable MP3 Player Ownership Reaches New High" (Ipsos Insight, June 29,2006 ) reported that in \(2006,20 \%\) of those in a random sample of 1112 Americans age 12 and older indicated that they owned an MP3 player. In a similar survey conducted in \(2005,\) only \(15 \%\) reported owning an \(\mathrm{MP} 3\) player. Suppose that the 2005 figure was also based on a random sample of size \(1112 .\) Estimate the difference in the proportion of Americans age 12 and older who owned an MP3 player in 2006 and the corresponding proportion for 2005 using a \(95 \%\) confidence interval. Is zero included in the interval? What does this tell you about the change in this proportion from 2005 to \(2006 ?\)

Acrylic bone cement is commonly used in total joint replacement to secure the artificial joint. Data on the force (measured in Newtons, \(N\) ) required to break a cement bond under two different temperature conditions and in two different mediums appear in the accompanying table. (These data are consistent with summary quantities appearing in the paper "Validation of the Small-Punch Test as a Technique for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement" (Journal of Engineering in Medicine [2006]: 11-21).) $$ \begin{array}{lcl} \text { Temperature } & \text { Medium } & \text { Data on Breaking Force } \\\ \hline \text { 22 degrees } & \text { Dry } & 100.8,141.9,194.8,118.4, \\ & & 176.1,213.1 \\ \text { 37 degrees } & \text { Dry } & 302.1,339.2,288.8,306.8, \\ & & 305.2,327.5 \\ \text { 22 degrees } & \text { Wet } & 385.3,368.3,322.6,307.4, \\ & & 357.9,321.4 \\ \text { 37 degrees } & \text { Wet } & 363.5,377.7,327.7,331.9, \\ & & 338.1,394.6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Estimate the difference between the mean breaking force in a dry medium at 37 degrees and the mean breaking force at the same temperature in a wet medium using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval. b. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean breaking force in a dry medium at the higher temperature is greater than the mean breaking force at the lower temperature by more than \(100 N ?\) Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .10 .

Breast feeding sometimes results in a temporary loss of bone mass as calcium is depleted in the mother's body to provide for milk production. The paper "Bone Mass Is Recovered from Lactation to Postweaning in Adolescent Mothers with Low Calcium Intakes" (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition [2004]: 1322- 1326) gave the accompanying data on total body bone mineral content (g) for a sample of mothers both during breast feeding (B) and in the postweaning period (P). Do the data suggest that true average total body bone mineral content during postweaning is greater than that during breast feeding by more than 25 g? State and test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .05 \(\begin{array}{lcccccc}\text { Subject } & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 \\\ \mathrm{~B} & 1928 & 2549 & 2825 & 1924 & 1628 & 2175 \\ \mathrm{P} & 2126 & 2885 & 2895 & 1942 & 1750 & 2184 \\ \text { Subject } & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & & \\\ \mathrm{~B} & 2114 & 2621 & 1843 & 2541 & & \\ \mathrm{P} & 2164 & 2626 & 2006 & 2627 & & \end{array}\)

The article "Plugged In, but Tuned Out" (USA Today, January 20,2010 ) summarizes data from two surveys of kids age 8 to 18 . One survey was conducted in 1999 and the other was conducted in \(2009 .\) Data on number of hours per day spent using electronic media that are consistent with summary quantities given in the article are given below (the actual sample sizes for the two surveys were much larger). For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the two samples as representative of kids age 8 to 18 in each of the 2 years that the surveys were conducted. $$ \begin{array}{l|lllllllllllllll} \hline 2009 & 5 & 9 & 5 & 8 & 7 & 6 & 7 & 9 & 7 & 9 & 6 & 9 & 10 & 9 & 8 \\ 1999 & 4 & 5 & 7 & 7 & 5 & 7 & 5 & 6 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 5 & 6 & 6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Because the given sample sizes are small, in order for the two-sample \(t\) test to be appropriate, what assumption must be made about the distribution of electronic media use times? Use the given data to construct graphical displays that would be useful in determining whether this assumption is reasonable. Do you think it is reasonable to use these data to carry out a two-sample \(t\) test? b. Do the given data provide convincing evidence that the mean number of hours per day spent using electronic media was greater in 2009 than in 1999 ? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .01 c. Construct and interpret a \(98 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference between the mean number of hours per day spent using electronic media in 2009 and 1999 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.