/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 44 The press release referenced in ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 11: Problem 44

The press release referenced in the previous exercise also included data from independent surveys of teenage drivers and parents of teenage drivers. In response to a question asking if they approved of laws banning the use of cell phones and texting while driving, \(74 \%\) of the teens surveyed and \(95 \%\) of the parents surveyed said they approved. The sample sizes were not given in the press release, but for purposes of this exercise, suppose that 600 teens and 400 parents of teens responded to the surveys and that it is reasonable to regard these samples as representative of the two populations. Do the data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of teens that approve of cell- phone and texting bans while driving is less than the proportion of parents of teens who approve? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .05

Short Answer

Expert verified
Without doing the actual calculations, it's impossible to give a precise answer. However, based on the steps provided, one would compare the calculated test statistic with the critical value (-1.645), to either reject or not reject the null hypothesis at the .05 significance level.

Step by step solution

01

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) assumes that there is no difference between the proportion of teens and the proportion of parents who approve of texting bans while driving. Technically, it can be stated as \(p_{teens} = p_{parents}\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) which we are testing for indicates that a larger proportion of parents approve of the ban than teens: \(p_{teens} < p_{parents}\). Be sure to define your parameters, where \(p_{teens}\) is the population proportion of teens who approve of the ban, and \(p_{parents}\) is the population proportion of parents who approve of the ban.
02

Find the sample proportions and variances

Using the provided sample data, calculate the sample proportions \(\hat{p}_{teens}\) and \(\hat{p}_{parents}\). \(\hat{p}_{teens} = 0.74\) and \(\hat{p}_{parents} = 0.95\). Also, the numbers of teens and parents surveyed were 600 and 400, respectively. Therefore, \(n_{teens} = 600\) and \(n_{parents} = 400\).
03

Calculate the test statistic

First, calculate the combined (pooled) sample proportion \(\hat{p}\). \(\hat{p} = \frac{n_{teens} * \hat{p}_{teens} + n_{parents} * \hat{p}_{parents}}{n_{teens} + n_{parents}}\). Then, the test statistic \(Z\) is calculated as \(Z = \frac{\hat{p}_{teens} - \hat{p}_{parents}}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_{teens}} + \frac{1}{n_{parents}})}}\).
04

Determine the critical value and compare with test statistic

Given the significance level \(.05\) and the nature of the alternate hypothesis \(p_{teens} < p_{parents}\) which is one-tailed, find the critical value for Z from the Z-table. The critical Z-score for a one-tailed test at the .05 significance level is -1.645. Compare this critical value to your calculated test statistic. If the test statistic is smaller, reject the null hypothesis.
05

Conclusion

Based on the comparison, if we reject the null hypothesis, it suggests there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion of teens that approve of cell-phone and texting bans while driving is less than the proportion of parents of teens who approve. If we fail to reject the null hypothesis, it means there is not enough evidence at the .05 significance level to support the claim that a larger proportion of parents approve of the ban than teens.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), serves as a starting point. It's a statement that assumes no effect or no difference between groups.
For example, in our case, the null hypothesis is \(p_{teens} = p_{parents}\). This means we start by assuming that both teens and parents have the same approval rate for bans on cell phone use while driving.
  • Purpose: It provides a baseline measure for the statistical test.
  • Role: If our test results significantly differ from \(H_0\), we may reject it.
Remember, even if the null hypothesis is not supported by the data, that's only part of the analysis.
Exploring the Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, signified as \(H_a\), is what you want to test for. It offers an alternative to the null hypothesis and suggests some effect or difference.
In this example, we have \(p_{teens} < p_{parents}\). This suggests that teens might actually approve less of these bans than parents do.
  • Challenge: To find enough statistical evidence to support \(H_a\).
  • Possibility: If the evidence is strong enough, we reject the null in favor of \(H_a\).
Always clearly define both hypotheses before beginning any calculations.
Significance Level in Hypothesis Testing
The significance level, often denoted by \(\alpha\), represents the threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis. It reflects the probability of rejecting \(H_0\) when it is actually true.
In our task, we're using a significance level of 0.05. This means that there's a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none.
  • Setting \(\alpha\): Typically, values are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10, based on how rigorous you want to be.
  • Comparison: Critical in deciding to accept or reject \(H_0\).
A smaller \(\alpha\) means you're more cautious about accepting \(H_a\).
Applying the Z-Test
The Z-test is a statistical method used to determine if there's a significant difference between the proportions of two groups. It helps evaluate our hypotheses.
First, calculate the combined (pooled) sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) and then the Z-test statistic using the formula:\[Z = \frac{\hat{p}_{teens} - \hat{p}_{parents}}{\sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_{teens}} + \frac{1}{n_{parents}})}}\]
  • Interpret: Compare the Z-test statistic to the critical Z-score.
  • Outcome: Determine if the calculated Z is in the critical region.
A Z less than -1.645 at a 0.05 level challenges \(H_0\). This indicates there might be a significant difference, leaning towards the alternative hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A hotel chain is interested in evaluating reservation processes. Guests can reserve a room by using either a telephone system or an online system that is accessed through the hotel's web site. Independent random samples of 80 guests who reserved a room by phone and 60 guests who reserved a room online were selected. Of those who reserved by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the reservation process. Of those who reserved online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is higher for those who reserve a room online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using \(\alpha=.05\)

The article "Fish Oil Staves Off Schizophrenia" (USA Today, February 2, \(2 \mathrm{O} 1 \mathrm{O}\) ) describes a study in which 81 patients age 13 to 25 who were considered atrisk for mental illness were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those in one group took four fish oil capsules daily. The other group took a placebo. After 1 year, \(5 \%\) of those in the fish oil group and \(28 \%\) of those in the placebo group had become psychotic. Is it appropriate to use the two-sample \(z\) test of this section to test hypotheses about the difference in the proportions of patients receiving the fish oil and the placebo treatments who became psychotic? Explain why or why not.

The paper "Ready or Not? Criteria for Marriage Readiness among Emerging Adults" (Journal of \(\underline{\text { Ado- }}\) lescent Research [2009]: 349-375) surveyed emerging adults (defined as age 18 to 25 ) from five different colleges in the United States. Several questions on the survey were used to construct a scale designed to measure endorsement of cohabitation. The paper states that "on average, emerging adult men \((\mathrm{M}=3.75, \mathrm{SD}=1.21)\) reported higher levels of cohabitation endorsement than emerging adult women \((\mathrm{M}=3.39, \mathrm{SD}=1.17) . "\) The sample sizes were 481 for women and 307 for men. a. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the reported difference in sample means provides convincing evidence that the mean cohabitation endorsement for emerging adult women is significantly less than the mean for emerging adult men for students at these five colleges. b. What additional information would you want in order to determine whether it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the hypothesis test from Part (a) to all college students?

The authors of the paper "Adolescents and MP3 Players: Too Many Risks, Too Few Precautions" \((P \mathrm{e}-\) diatrics [2009]: e953-e958) concluded that more boys than girls listen to music at high volumes. This conclusion was based on data from independent random samples of 764 Dutch boys and 748 Dutch girls age 12 to \(19 .\) Of the boys, 397 reported that they almost always listen to music at a high volume setting. Of the girls, 331 reported listening to music at a high volume setting. Do the sample data support the authors' conclusion that the proportion of Dutch boys who listen to music at high volume is greater than this proportion for Dutch girls? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

Do certain behaviors result in a severe drain on energy resources because a great deal of energy is expended in comparison to energy intake? The article "The Energetic Cost of Courtship and Aggression in a Plethodontid Salamander" (Ecology [1983]: 979-983) reported on one of the few studies concerned with behavior and energy expenditure. The accompanying table gives oxygen consumption \((\mathrm{mL} / \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{hr})\) for male-female salamander pairs. (The determination of consumption values is rather complicated. It is partly for this reason that so few studies of this type have been carried out.) $$ \begin{array}{lccc} \text { Behavior } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Size } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { Mean } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Sample } \\ \text { sd } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Noncourting } & 11 & .072 & .0066 \\ \text { Courting } & 15 & .099 & .0071 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. The pooled \(t\) test is a test procedure for testing \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=\) hypothesized value when it is reasonable to assume that the two population distributions are normal with equal standard deviations \(\left(\sigma_{1}=\right.\) \(\sigma_{2}\) ). The test statistic for the pooled \(t\) test is obtained by replacing both \(s_{1}\) and \(s_{2}\) in the two-sample \(t\) test statistic with \(s_{p}\) where \(s_{p}=\sqrt{\frac{\left(n_{1}-1\right) s_{1}^{2}+\left(n_{2}-1\right) s_{2}^{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}-2}}\) When the population distributions are normal with equal standard deviations and \(H_{0}\) is true, the resulting pooled \(t\) statistic has a \(t\) distribution with \(\mathrm{df}=n_{1}+\) \(n_{2}-2 .\) For the reported data, the two sample standard deviations are similar. Use the pooled \(t\) test with \(\alpha=.05\) to determine whether the mean oxygen consumption for courting pairs is higher than the mean oxygen consumption for noncourting pairs. b. Would the conclusion in Part (a) have been different if the two-sample \(t\) test had been used rather than the pooled \(t\) test?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.