/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 The study described in the paper... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The study described in the paper "Marketing Actions Can Modulate Neural Representation of Experienced Pleasantness" (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science [2008]\(: 1050-1054)\) investigated whether price affects people's judgment. Twenty people each tasted six cabernet sauvignon wines and rated how they liked them on a scale of 1 to 6 . Prior to tasting each wine, participants were told the price of the wine. Of the six wines tasted, two were actually the same wine, but for one tasting the participant was told that the wine cost \(\$ 10\) per bottle and for the other tasting the participant was told that the wine cost \(\$ 90\) per bottle. The participants were randomly assigned either to taste the \(\$ 90\) wine first and the \(\$ 10\) wine second, or the \(\$ 10\) wine first and the \(\$ 90\) wine second. Differences (computed by subtracting the rating for the tasting in which the participant thought the wine cost \(\$ 10\) from the rating for the tasting in which the participant thought the wine cost \(\$ 90\) ) were computed. The differences that follow are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper. Difference \((\$ 90-\$ 10)\) \(\begin{array}{cccccccccccccccccccc}2 & 4 & 1 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 2 & 1 & 3 & 3 & 1 & 4 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1 & -1\end{array}\) Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the mean rating assigned to the wine when the cost is described as \(\$ 90\) is greater than the mean rating assigned to the wine when the cost is described as \(\$ 10 .\) Use \(\alpha=.01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the calculated t-value and the corresponding critical value, the null hypothesis is either rejected or not rejected. If it is rejected, it can be concluded that the price does have a significant effect on the wine's rating; if it is not rejected, then the price does not significantly affect the rating.

Step by step solution

01

Formulate the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) : The mean rating difference is zero, i.e., the price does not affect the rating.\(\mu = 0\)\n\nThe alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) : The mean rating difference is greater than zero, which would indicate that the \(\$ 90\) wine has a higher rating. \(\mu > 0\)
02

Calculate Sample Mean and Standard Deviation

Use the given differences to calculate the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)) and the sample standard deviation (s). The differences are: \[2, 4, 1, 2, 1, 0, 0, 3, 0, 2, 1, 3, 3, 1, 4, 1, 2, 2, 1, -1\]\n\nCalculate the sample mean (\(\bar{x}\)) as the sum of all differences divided by the number of differences. Then calculate the sample standard deviation (s) by taking the square root of the sum of the squared difference between each difference and the sample mean, divided by the number of differences minus 1.
03

Calculate Test Statistic

The test statistic for the t-test is calculated as follows: \n\n\[t = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}\]\n\nwhere \(\mu\) is the population mean (our null hypothesis), \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the number of observations (differences).
04

Find the Critical Value

From the t-distribution table, find the critical value (\(t_{crit}\)) for a one-tailed test with degrees of freedom = n-1 and significance level (\(\alpha\)) of 0.01.
05

Reject or Fail to Reject the Null Hypothesis

If the calculated test statistic (t) is greater than the critical value (\(t_{crit}\)), then reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This would mean that the price does affect the wine's rating. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis, which means that the price does not significantly affect the wine's rating.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In the realm of hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) stands as a statement that indicates no effect or no difference. It serves as a baseline or a default position that a researcher seeks to challenge. As exemplified by the wine study, the null hypothesis suggested that price has no impact on how participants rated the wine, essentially stating that the mean rating difference due to price is zero (\( \bar{x} = 0 \)). Critically, it is the assumption that any observed difference in data, such as the ratings of the wines, is due to chance rather than a systematic effect.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\) or \(H_1\) represents the statement investigators aim to support, which proposes that there is a true effect or difference. In our study, the alternative hypothesis suggests there is an effect of the price on wine ratings—specifically, that the wine described as costing \$90 is rated higher than when it is described as costing \$10. The formulation of \(H_a: \bar{x} > 0 \) sets the stage for a one-tailed test, where the direction of the effect is specified as higher ratings for the more expensive wine label.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance acts as a threshold for determining whether the observed effect is unlikely to have occurred by chance. This concept relies upon a predefined alpha level (\(\alpha\) which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is indeed true (Type I error). In this scenario, \(\alpha = 0.01\) implies that there is only a 1% probability that the findings could be due to random variation, as opposed to a genuine difference in ratings based on the perceived price of the wine.
t-test
A t-test is a statistical examination utilized to compare the mean of a sample to a known value (often the population mean), or to compare the means of two samples. In explicit terms for our study, we apply a one-sample t-test to determine if the mean difference in wine ratings (\(\bar{x}\) differs significantly from zero under the null hypothesis. The t-test calculates a t-value that serves as a test statistic, which we then compare with the critical value to draw conclusions about our hypotheses.
Sample Mean
The sample mean (\(\bar{x}\) is a measure that captures the average rating difference observed in the study sample. It is computed by summing all the rating differences provided by participants and dividing by the total number of observations. The study's sample mean is crucial since it functions as an estimator of the population mean difference, which we are looking to compare against our null hypothesis of zero effect.
Sample Standard Deviation
Sample standard deviation (s) quantifies the extent of variation or dispersion in the rating differences from the sample mean. It is essential for calculating the standard error, which adjusts for the fact that we are dealing with a sample rather than an entire population. Sample standard deviation is found by taking the root of the sum of squared deviations of each sample data point from the sample mean divided by one less than the number of observations.
Critical Value
The critical value, which is found using statistical tables or computational tools, is a cut-off point that determines the boundary for rejecting the null hypothesis. Depending on the chosen significance level and the degrees of freedom (usually \(n - 1\) for a sample of size n), the critical value forms the threshold for how extreme the test statistic needs to be to deem the result statistically significant. In hypothesis testing, comparing the test statistic against the critical value decides whether the null hypothesis can be rejected.
p-value
The p-value is the probability of obtaining a result at least as extreme as the one actually observed, given that the null hypothesis is true. It quantifies the evidence against the null hypothesis where a small p-value (\(p \< \alpha\) indicates strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis. In contrast, a larger p-value suggests insufficient evidence to do so, leading to retaining the null hypothesis. The p-value complements the decision-making process by providing a scale of the evidence rather than just a binary outcome.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The press release titled "Keeping Score When It counts: Graduation Rates and Academic Progress Rates" (The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport, March 16,2009 ) gave the 2009 graduation rates for African-American basketball players and for white basketball players at every NCAA Division I university with a basketball program. Explain why it is not necessary to use a paired \(t\) test to determine if the mean graduation rate for African-American basketball players differs from the mean graduation rate for white basketball players for Division I schools.

The paper "The Psychological Consequences of Money" (Science [2006]: \(1154-1156\) ) describes several experiments designed to investigate the way in which money can change behavior. In one experiment, participants completed one of two versions of a task in which they were given lists of five words and were asked to rearrange four of the words to create a sensible phrase. For one group, half of the 30 unscrambled phrases related to money, whereas the other half were phrases that were unrelated to money. For the second group (the control group), none of the 30 unscrambled phrases related to money. Participants were 44 students at Florida State University. Participants received course credit and \(\$ 2\) for their participation. The following description of the experiment is from the paper: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, in which they descrambled phrases that primed money or neutral concepts. Then participants completed some filler questionnaires, after which the experimenter told them that the experiment was finished and gave them a false debriefing. This step was done so that participants would not connect the donation opportunity to the experiment. As the experimenter exited the room, she mentioned that the lab was taking donations for the University Student Fund and that there was a box by the door if the participant wished to donate. Amount of money donated was the measure of helping. We found that participants primed with money donated significantly less money to the student fund than participants not primed with money \([t(38)=2.13, P<0.05]\) The paper also gave the following information on amount donated for the two experimental groups. a. Explain why the random assignment of participants to experimental groups is important in this experiment. b. Use the given information to verify the values of the test statistic and degrees of freedom (38, given in parentheses just after the \(t\) in the quote from the paper) and the statement about the \(P\) -value. Assume that both sample sizes are 22 . c. Do you think that use of the two-sample \(t\) test was appropriate in this situation? Hint: Are the assumptions required for the two-sample \(t\) test reasonable?

Do girls think they don't need to take as many science classes as boys? The article "Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences" (Science Education [1999]: 55-76) gives information from a survey of children in grades \(4,5,\) and \(6 .\) The 224 girls participating in the survey each indicated the number of science courses they intended to take in the future, and they also indicated the number of science courses they thought boys their age should take in the future. For each girl, the authors calculated the difference between the number of science classes she intends to take and the number she thinks boys should take. a. Explain why these data are paired. b. The mean of the differences was -.83 (indicating girls intended, on average, to take fewer classes than they thought boys should take), and the standard deviation was 1.51. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean difference.

The following quote is from the article "Canadians Are Healthier Than We Are" (Associated Press, May 31,2006 ): "The Americans also reported more heart disease and major depression, but those differences were too small to be statistically significant." This statement was based on the responses of a sample of 5183 Americans and a sample of 3505 Canadians. The proportion of Canadians who reported major depression was given as .082 . a. Assuming that the researchers used a one-sided test with a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .09? Explain why or why not. b. Assuming that the researchers used a significance level of \(.05,\) could the sample proportion of Americans reporting major depression have been as large as .10? Explain why or why not.

In December 2001 , the Department of Veterans Affairs announced that it would begin paying benefits to soldiers suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease who had served in the Gulf War (The New york Times, December 11,2001 ). This decision was based on an analysis in which the Lou Gehrig's disease incidence rate (the proportion developing the disease) for the approximately 700,000 soldiers sent to the Gulf between August 1990 and July 1991 was compared to the incidence rate for the approximately 1.8 million other soldiers who were not in the Gulf during this time period. Based on these data, explain why it is not appropriate to perform a formal inference procedure (such as the two-sample \(z\) test) and yet it is still reasonable to conclude that the incidence rate is higher for Gulf War veterans than for those who did not serve in the Gulf War.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.