/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 The paper "Effects of Fast-Food ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children in a National Household Survey" ( Pediatrics [2004]: 112 118 ) investigated the effect of fast-food consumption on other dietary variables. For a sample of 663 teens who reported that they did not eat fast food during a typical day, the mean daily calorie intake was 2258 and the sample standard deviation was \(1519 .\) For a sample of 413 teens who reported that they did eat fast food on a typical day, the mean calorie intake was 2637 and the standard deviation was 1138 . a. What assumptions about the two samples must be reasonable in order for the use of the two-sample \(t\) confidence interval to be appropriate? b. Use the given information to estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Three assumptions needed for a two-sample t-test are independence of the two samples, normal distribution of the populations, and equality of the variances. b) The estimated difference in mean daily calorie intake between teens who eat fast food and those who do not is 379 calories.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Assumptions for two-sample t-test

For a two-sample t-test to be appropriate, the following assumptions about the two samples must be reasonably met: 1. The two populations from which the samples are drawn are independent of each other. 2. The two populations are normally distributed. 3. The variances of the two populations are equal.
02

Estimating the Difference in Mean Daily Calorie Intake

To estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who don’t, we subtract the mean calorie intake of the group who do not eat fast food from the group who do. Using the information given: mean calorie intake (fast food) = 2637 and mean intake (no fast food) = 2258. So, the estimated difference in mean daily calorie intake is \(2637 - 2258 = 379\) calories.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean Daily Calorie Intake
Understanding mean daily calorie intake involves recognizing that it is an average number of calories consumed by individuals each day. In the context of the study you read about, the reported values were calculated separately for teens who ate fast food and those who didn't. Here's how it breaks down:
  • For teens who did not eat fast food, the mean was 2258 calories.
  • For those who ate fast food, it was 2637 calories.
These values are crucial because they helped frame the research question: Does fast food consumption increase daily calorie intake? By comparing these averages, researchers could later analyze whether the observed difference was meaningful or just due to random variation.
Assumptions of Statistical Tests
When performing a two-sample t-test, certain assumptions ensure the test's validity. Firstly, both samples must be independent of one another. This means that the calorie intake of teens in one group does not affect those in the other. Also, the populations from which the samples are drawn need to be normally distributed. In reality, particularly with larger sample sizes, this assumption is often relaxed due to the Central Limit Theorem. However, it is an important consideration. The final assumption is homogeneity of variance, meaning the variabilities in both groups should be similar, as indicated by their standard deviations (1519 and 1138, respectively). Failing to meet these assumptions can lead to incorrect conclusions.
Confidence Interval Estimation
A confidence interval gives a range of values within which we can say with a certain degree of confidence that the true difference in population means lies. To calculate the confidence interval for the difference in means, you first compute the actual difference in sample means, which in this case was 379 calories. However, we don't just stop there. To finalize a confidence interval:
  • Identify the standard deviation of each group.
  • Use these to calculate the standard error of the difference.
  • Apply the standard error in a t-distribution setting to establish your interval.
This process will guide you to construct a range that estimates how different the average calorie intakes might truly be, beyond just the sample we examined. This way, researchers can discuss the findings with more confidence, knowing they have accounted for sample variability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "The Observed Effects of Teenage Passengers on the Risky Driving Behavior of Teenage Drivers" (Accident Analysis and Prevention [2005]: 973-982) investigated the driving behavior of teenagers by observing their vehicles as they left a high school parking lot and then again at a site approximately \(\frac{1}{2}\) mile from the school. Assume that it is reasonable to regard the teen drivers in this study as representative of the population of teen drivers. Use a .01 level of significance for any hypothesis tests. a. Data consistent with summary quantities appearing in the paper are given in the accompanying table. The measurements represent the difference between the observed vehicle speed and the posted speed limit (in miles per hour) for a sample of male teenage drivers and a sample of female teenage drivers. Do these data provide convincing support for the claim that, on average, male teenage drivers exceed the speed limit by more than do female teenage drivers? $$ \begin{array}{cc} \hline \text { Male Driver } & \text { Female Driver } \\ \hline 1.3 & -0.2 \\ 1.3 & 0.5 \\ 0.9 & 1.1 \\ 2.1 & 0.7 \\ 0.7 & 1.1 \\ 1.3 & 1.2 \\ 3 & 0.1 \\ 1.3 & 0.9 \\ 0.6 & 0.5 \\ 2.1 & 0.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ b. Consider the average miles per hour over the speed limit for teenage drivers with passengers shown in the table at the top of the following page. For purposes of this exercise, suppose that each driver-passenger combination mean is based on a sample of size \(n=40\) and that all sample standard deviations are equal to .8 . $$ \begin{array}{l|cc} & \text { Male Passenger } & \text { Female Passenger } \\ \hline \text { Male Driver } & 5.2 & .3 \\ \text { Female Driver } & 2.3 & .6 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ i. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the average number of miles per hour over the speed limit is greater for male drivers with male passengers than it is for male drivers with female passengers? ii. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the average number of miles per hour over the speed limit is greater for female drivers with male passengers than it is for female drivers with female passengers? iii. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the average number of miles per hour over the speed limit is smaller for male drivers with female passengers than it is for female drivers with male passengers? c. Write a few sentences commenting on the effects of gender on teenagers driving with passengers.

"Mountain Biking May Reduce Fertility in Men, Study Says" was the headline of an article appearing in the San Luis Obispo Tribune (December 3,2002 ). This conclusion was based on an Austrian study that compared sperm counts of avid mountain bikers (those who ride at least 12 hours per week) and nonbikers. Ninety percent of the avid mountain bikers studied had low sperm counts, as compared to \(26 \%\) of the nonbikers. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent samples of 100 avid mountain bikers and 100 non-bikers and that it is reasonable to view these samples as representative of Austrian avid mountain bikers and nonbikers. a. Do these data provide convincing evidence that the proportion of Austrian avid mountain bikers with low sperm count is higher than the proportion of Austrian nonbikers? b. Based on the outcome of the test in Part (a), is it reasonable to conclude that mountain biking 12 hours per week or more causes low sperm count? Explain.

Two different underground pipe coatings for preventing corrosion are to be compared. The effect of a coating (as measured by maximum depth of corrosion penetration on a piece of pipe) may vary with depth, orientation, soil type, pipe composition, etc. Describe how an experiment that filters out the effects of these extraneous factors could be carried out.

The paper "The Psychological Consequences of Money" (Science [2006]: \(1154-1156\) ) describes several experiments designed to investigate the way in which money can change behavior. In one experiment, participants completed one of two versions of a task in which they were given lists of five words and were asked to rearrange four of the words to create a sensible phrase. For one group, half of the 30 unscrambled phrases related to money, whereas the other half were phrases that were unrelated to money. For the second group (the control group), none of the 30 unscrambled phrases related to money. Participants were 44 students at Florida State University. Participants received course credit and \(\$ 2\) for their participation. The following description of the experiment is from the paper: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, in which they descrambled phrases that primed money or neutral concepts. Then participants completed some filler questionnaires, after which the experimenter told them that the experiment was finished and gave them a false debriefing. This step was done so that participants would not connect the donation opportunity to the experiment. As the experimenter exited the room, she mentioned that the lab was taking donations for the University Student Fund and that there was a box by the door if the participant wished to donate. Amount of money donated was the measure of helping. We found that participants primed with money donated significantly less money to the student fund than participants not primed with money \([t(38)=2.13, P<0.05]\) The paper also gave the following information on amount donated for the two experimental groups. a. Explain why the random assignment of participants to experimental groups is important in this experiment. b. Use the given information to verify the values of the test statistic and degrees of freedom (38, given in parentheses just after the \(t\) in the quote from the paper) and the statement about the \(P\) -value. Assume that both sample sizes are 22 . c. Do you think that use of the two-sample \(t\) test was appropriate in this situation? Hint: Are the assumptions required for the two-sample \(t\) test reasonable?

The paper "Ready or Not? Criteria for Marriage Readiness among Emerging Adults" (Journal of \(\underline{\text { Ado- }}\) lescent Research [2009]: 349-375) surveyed emerging adults (defined as age 18 to 25 ) from five different colleges in the United States. Several questions on the survey were used to construct a scale designed to measure endorsement of cohabitation. The paper states that "on average, emerging adult men \((\mathrm{M}=3.75, \mathrm{SD}=1.21)\) reported higher levels of cohabitation endorsement than emerging adult women \((\mathrm{M}=3.39, \mathrm{SD}=1.17) . "\) The sample sizes were 481 for women and 307 for men. a. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if the reported difference in sample means provides convincing evidence that the mean cohabitation endorsement for emerging adult women is significantly less than the mean for emerging adult men for students at these five colleges. b. What additional information would you want in order to determine whether it is reasonable to generalize the conclusion of the hypothesis test from Part (a) to all college students?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.