/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 The poll referenced in the previ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The poll referenced in the previous exercise (“Military Draft Study," AP- lpsos, June 2005 ) also included the following question: "If the military draft were reinstated, would you favor or oppose drafting women as well as men?" Forty-three percent of the 1000 people responding said that they would favor drafting women if the draft were reinstated. Using a .05 significance level, carry out a test to determine if there is convincing evidence that fewer than half of adult Americans would favor the drafting of women.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The actual answer depends on the calculated Z-score and the corresponding P-value. If P-value is less than or equal to significance level 0.05, then we reject the null hypothesis and suggest that there is convincing evidence. If not, there is no sufficient evidence.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis \(H_0\) assumes there is no effect or difference. Here, it is stated as \(H_0: p = 0.5\), where p represents proportion. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) is \(H_a: p < 0.5\). This is a one-sided test where it is checked if the real proportion is less than 0.5.
02

Calculate Test Statistic

To calculate the test statistic, we can use the formula for z score for test of proportion which is \(Z = \frac{p - P}{\sqrt{\frac{P(1 - P)}{n}}}\). Here, p is the sample proportion, P is the known proportion (here 0.5), and n is the number of observations in the sample. Substitute the values to get the z-score: \(Z = \frac{0.43 - 0.5}{\sqrt{\frac{0.5(1 - 0.5)}{1000}}}\).
03

Find P-value

The P-value is the probability that the z-score is less than the calculated z-value under \(H_0\). To find it, a topic-specific statistical table (called a z-table) can be referred or a statistical software/tool can be used. P-value corresponds to the z-score calculated in step 2.
04

Compare P-value and significance level

Here the significance level \(\alpha\) is given as 0.05. If the P-value is less than or equal to \(\alpha\), then reject \(H_0\), otherwise fail to reject \(H0\).
05

Draw Conclusions

Based on the comparison made in the previous step, if \(H0\) is rejected, it suggests that there is convincing evidence that fewer than half of adult Americans would favor the drafting of women. If fail to reject \(H0\), it means that there is not enough evidence to support \(H_a\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null and Alternative Hypothesis
When performing hypothesis testing in statistics, understanding the null and alternative hypothesis is paramount. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) represents a statement of no effect or no difference that is to be tested—which in our exercise is the belief that half of the adult Americans (\(p = 0.5\)) would favor drafting women. Conversely, the alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\text{ or }H_1\text{ in some texts}\)) is the statement we suspect might be true instead of the null hypothesis. In our exercise, the alternative hypothesis is that fewer than half (\(p < 0.5\text{ or }H_a: p < 0.5\)) of adult Americans would favor the drafting of women. Ideally, the purpose of these hypotheses is to provide a clear statement of what is being tested, laying the groundwork for further statistical analysis.

In hypothesis testing, you either reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis if there is sufficient evidence, or you fail to reject it when the evidence isn't strong enough. It's important to note that 'failing to reject' a hypothesis is not the same as 'accepting' it; rather, it means we don't have enough statistical evidence to favor the alternative.
Significance Level
The significance level in hypothesis testing is denoted as \(\alpha\) and represents the threshold for determining whether a statistical result is sufficiently unusual to reject the null hypothesis. In our exercise, the significance level is set at 0.05, indicating a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference. This level of significance means we would consider results that have less than a 5% chance of occurring due to random variation in the data as statistically significant enough to reject the null hypothesis.

Choosing a significance level is an important decision in hypothesis testing as it affects how stringent and conservative the test will be. Commonly used significance levels are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10. This choice should reflect the consequences of making a mistake in rejecting the null hypothesis, known as a 'Type I error'.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a standardized value calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. It is used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It essentially measures how far the sample statistic is from the hypothesized value under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. In the provided exercise, the z-score serves as the test statistic, calculated from the formula \(Z = \frac{p - P}{\sqrt{\frac{P(1 - P)}{n}}}\).

The test statistic can then be compared against a critical value from a statistical distribution (like the Normal distribution), which corresponds to the significance level chosen. A larger absolute value of the test statistic indicates a greater distance from the Null hypothesis, implying more evidence against it.
P-value
The p-value is a crucial concept in hypothesis testing, representing the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one observed if the null hypothesis is true. In essence, it tells us how 'surprising' our data is under the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct. With a low p-value, typically below the significance level of 0.05, we would conclude that such data are unlikely to occur by random chance alone, therefore suggesting enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

In the exercise’s context, the p-value is found by looking up the calculated z-score in a z-table or by using a statistical software, and it corresponds to the likelihood of seeing a proportion less than 0.43 if the true proportion favoring the drafting of women is actually 0.5. If this calculated p-value is less than 0.05, this would be considered strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
Statistical Inference
Statistical inference encompasses the process of making conclusions about a population based on sample data. It is rooted in probability and deals with the estimation of parameters and testing of hypotheses. The goal of statistical inference is to infer properties about a population that might not be directly observable due to practical constraints on data collection.

In our exercise, the conclusion is drawn about the sentiment of the entire population of adult Americans on the drafting of women, based on the sample of 1000 survey responses. The inference process involves using the p-value and significance level to assess the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis. Ideally, statistical inference guides decision-making in the presence of uncertainty and variability, and it should always be done with an understanding of the possible sampling errors and assumptions behind the data collection process.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Playing Active Video Games Increases Energy Expenditure in Children" (Pediatrics [2009]: \(534-539\) ) describes an interesting investigation of the possible cardiovascular benefits of active video games. Mean heart rate for healthy boys age 10 to 13 after walking on a treadmill at \(2.6 \mathrm{~km} /\) hour for 6 minutes is 98 beats per minute (bpm). For each of 14 boys, heart rate was measured after 15 minutes of playing Wii Bowling. The resulting sample mean and standard deviation were 101 bpm and 15 bpm, respectively. For purposes of this exercise, assume that it is reasonable to regard the sample of boys as representative of boys age 10 to 13 and that the distribution of heart rates after 15 minutes of Wii Bowling is approximately normal. a. Does the sample provide convincing evidence that the mean heart rate after 15 minutes of Wii Bowling is different from the known mean heart rate after 6 minutes walking on the treadmill? Carry out a hypothesis test using \(\alpha=.01\). b. The known resting mean heart rate for boys in this age group is \(66 \mathrm{bpm}\). Is there convincing evidence that the mean heart rate after Wii Bowling for 15 minutes is higher than the known mean resting heart rate for boys of this age? Use \(\alpha=.01\). c. Based on the outcomes of the tests in Parts (a) and (b), write a paragraph comparing the benefits of treadmill walking and Wii Bowling in terms of raising heart rate over the resting heart rate.

In a survey of 1000 women age 22 to 35 who work full time, 540 indicated that they would be willing to give up some personal time in order to make more money (USA Today. March 4, 2010 ). The sample was selected in a way that was designed to produce a sample that was representative of women in the targeted age group. a. Do the sample data provide convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). b. Would it be reasonable to generalize the conclusion from Part (a) to all working women? Explain why or why not.

Researchers at the University of Washington and Harvard University analyzed records of breast cancer screening and diagnostic evaluations ("Mammogram Cancer Scares More Frequent than Thought," USA Today, April 16, 1998). Discussing the benefits and downsides of the screening process, the article states that, although the rate of false-positives is higher than previously thought, if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise. Suppose that such a screening test is used to decide between a null hypothesis of \(H_{0}:\) no cancer is present and an alternative hypothesis of \(H_{a}:\) cancer is present. (Although these are not hypotheses about a population characteristic, this exercise illustrates the definitions of Type I and Type II errors.) a. Would a false-positive (thinking that cancer is present when in fact it is not) be a Type I error or a Type II error? b. Describe a Type I error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type I error. c. Describe a Type II error in the context of this problem, and discuss the consequences of making a Type II error. d. What aspect of the relationship between the probability of Type I and Type II errors is being described by the statement in the article that if radiologists were less aggressive in following up on suspicious tests, the rate of false-positives would fall but the rate of missed cancers would rise?

The paper "Debt Literacy, Financial Experiences and Over-Indebtedness" (Social Science Research Network, Working paper W14808, 2008 ) included analysis of data from a national sample of 1000 Americans. One question on the survey was: "You owe \(\$ 3000\) on your credit card. You pay a minimum payment of \(\$ 30\) each month. At an Annual Percentage Rate of \(12 \%\) (or \(1 \%\) per month), how many years would it take to eliminate your credit card debt if you made no additional charges?" Answer options for this question were: (a) less than 5 years; (b) between 5 and 10 years; (c) between 10 and 15 years; (d) never-you will continue to be in debt; (e) don't know; and (f) prefer not to answer. a. Only 354 of the 1000 respondents chose the correct answer of never. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the sample is representative of adult Americans. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who can answer this question correctly is less than \(.40(40 \%) ?\) Use \(\alpha=.05\) to test the appropriate hypotheses. b. The paper also reported that \(37.8 \%\) of those in the sample chose one of the wrong answers \((a, b,\) and \(c)\) as their response to this question. Is it reasonable to conclude that more than one-third of adult Americans would select a wrong answer to this question? Use \(\alpha=.05\).

Much concern has been expressed regarding the practice of using nitrates as meat preservatives. In one study involving possible effects of these chemicals, bacteria cultures were grown in a medium containing nitrates. The rate of uptake of radio-labeled amino acid (in dpm, disintegrations per minute) was then determined for each culture, yielding the following observations: \(\begin{array}{llllllll}7251 & 6871 & 9632 & 6866 & 9094 & 5849 & 8957 & 7978 \\\ 7064 & 7494 & 7883 & 8178 & 7523 & 8724 & 7468 & \end{array}\) Suppose that it is known that the mean rate of uptake for cultures without nitrates is 8000 . Do the data suggest that the addition of nitrates results in a decrease in the mean rate of uptake? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of .10 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.