/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 Consider a system consisting of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a system consisting of four components, as pictured in the following diagram: Components 1 and 2 form a series subsystem, as do Components 3 and 4 . The two subsystems are connected in parallel. Suppose that \(P(1\) works \()=.9\), \(P(2\) works \()=.9, P(3\) works \()=.9\), and \(P(4\) works \()=.9\) and that these four outcomes are independent (the four components work independently of one another). a. The \(1-2\) subsystem works only if both components work. What is the probability of this happening? b. What is the probability that the \(1-2\) subsystem doesn't work? that the \(3-4\) subsystem doesn't work? c. The system won't work if the \(1-2\) subsystem doesn't work and if the \(3-4\) subsystem also doesn't work. What is the probability that the system won't work? that it will work? d. How would the probability of the system working change if a \(5-6\) subsystem was added in parallel with the other two subsystems? e. How would the probability that the system works change if there were three components in series in each of the two subsystems?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. .81 b. .19 c. System doesn't work: .0361, works: .9639 d. .993141 e. .999999

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the probability of the \(1-2\) subsystem working

The \(1-2\) subsystem works only if both Component 1 and Component 2 work. Since these two components are independent, the probability that both work is the product of their individual probabilities. Thus, \(P(1-2\) works \() = P(1\) works \() * P(2\) works \() = .9 * .9 = .81.
02

Calculate the probability of the \(1-2\) subsystem not working

The probability of an event's complement is 1 minus the probability of the event itself. So, \(P(1-2\) doesn't work \() = 1 - P(1-2\) works \() = 1 - .81 = .19.
03

Calculate the probability of the \(3-4\) subsystem not working

This calculation is similar to Step 2, because Components 3 and 4 are identical to Components 1 and 2. So, \(P(3-4\) doesn't work \() = 1 - P(3-4\) works \() = 1 - .81 = .19.
04

Calculate the probability that the system won't work

For the entire system to not work, neither the \(1-2\) subsystem nor the \(3-4\) subsystem can work. Since these are independent, this probability is the product of their individual probabilities. Thus, \(P(system\) doesn't work \() = P(1-2\) doesn't work \() * P(3-4\) doesn't work \() = .19 * .19 = .0361.
05

Calculate the probability that the system will work

The probability that the system will work is the complement of the system not working. So, \(P(system\) works \() = 1 - P(system\) doesn't work \() = 1 - .0361 = .9639.
06

Calculate the effect of adding a \(5-6\) subsystem in parallel

If a \(5-6\) subsystem is added in parallel, valid with the same properties as the others, and it fails with probability .19, then the system fails only when all three subsystems fail. Thus, \(P(system\) doesn't work with \(5-6\) \() = .19^3 = .006859. As a result, the system working increases to \(P(system\) works with \(5-6\) \() = 1 - .006859 = .993141.
07

Calculate the effect of having three series components in each subsystem

If there were three components in series in each subsystem, with a .9 chance of each working, then each subsystem would now fail with a probability of .1^3 = .001. The system will fail when both subsystems fail, which is \(P(system\) doesn't work = .001^2 = .000001. So, \(P(system\) works = 1 - .000001 = .999999.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Events
In probability theory, a core concept is the idea of independent events. When events are considered independent, the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of another. In simpler terms, each event happens without influencing the other. This is a crucial assumption in problems involving multiple components or situations.

For instance, suppose we have four components in a system that need to function without depending on each other. Component 1 working is independent of Component 2, 3, or 4 working. The probability of all components working together is the product of their individual probabilities. If each component independently works with a probability of 0.9, then for the series part consisting of Component 1 and Component 2 to work, the probability is:
  • \( P(1\) and \(2 \text{ work}) = P(1 \text{ works}) \times P(2 \text{ works}) = 0.9 \times 0.9 = 0.81 \)
This multiplication process extends to other independent events, providing a powerful method to analyze components in systems and many other scenarios involving probability.
Series and Parallel Systems
Understanding the designs of series and parallel systems is essential in determining a system's functioning probability. A series system consists of multiple components arranged in sequence, where every component must function for the entire system to work. Hence, the overall probability of success is the product of the individual component probabilities.

Take an example of a simple two-component series system with both components having a working probability of 0.9:
  • \( P(1\text{-}2 \text{ works}) = 0.9 \times 0.9 = 0.81 \)
In contrast, a parallel system has components arranged side-by-side, so the system works if at least one component works. For parallel subsystems like the one shown above with 1-2 and 3-4:
  • \( P(\text{system doesn't work}) = P(1\text{-}2 \text{ doesn't work}) \times P(3\text{-}4 \text{ doesn't work}) = 0.19 \times 0.19 = 0.0361 \)
  • \( P(\text{system works}) = 1 - 0.0361 = 0.9639 \)
Parallel arrangements improve reliability since multiple pathways can lead to success.
Complementary Probability
The concept of complementary probability helps determine the likelihood of an event not occurring. It is based on the principle that the sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes equals one. If one knows the probability of an event, the probability of its complement is straightforward to calculate.

In a probability context, the probability of an event not happening is 1 minus the probability of the event itself. For instance, if the probability of a series system not functioning is 0.81, then the probability of it failing is:
  • \( P(1\text{-}2 \text{ doesn't work}) = 1 - 0.81 = 0.19 \)
Similarly, if a parallel system only fails if every component or subsystem fails, the complementary probability rule becomes useful:
  • Overall failure probability in such combined systems can be calculated and adjusted by subtracting from one.
Using complementary probabilities simplifies the task of understanding complex systems by focusing on the few possible reasons for their failure rather than success.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Gallup Poll conducted in November 2002 examined how people perceived the risks associated with smoking. The following table summarizes data on smoking status and perceived risk of smoking that is consistent with summary quantities published by Gallup: $$\begin{array}{l|cccc} \hline \text { Smoking } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Very } \\ \text { Status } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Some- } \\ \text { what } \\ \text { Harmful } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Not } \\ \text { Too } \\ \text { Harmful } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Not } \\ \text { at All } \\ \text { Harmful } \end{array} & \text { Harmful } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Current } \\ \text { Smoker } \\ \text { Former } \end{array} & 60 & 30 & 5 & 1 \\ \text { Smoker } & 78 & 16 & 3 & 2 \\ \begin{array}{l} \text { Never } \\ \text { Smoked } \end{array} & 86 & 10 & 2 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ Assume that it is reasonable to consider these data representative of the U.S. adult population. Consider the following conclusion: Current smokers are less likely to view smoking as very harmful than either former smokers or those who have never smoked. Provide a justification for this conclusion. Use the information in the table to calculate estimates of any probabilities that are relevant to your justification.

In a small city, approximately \(15 \%\) of those eligible are called for jury duty in any one calendar year. People are selected for jury duty at random from those eligible, and the same individual cannot be called more than once in the same year. What is the probability that an eligible person in this city is selected 2 years in a row? 3 years in a row?

Approximately \(30 \%\) of the calls to an airline reservation phone line result in a reservation being made. a. Suppose that an operator handles 10 calls. What is the probability that none of the 10 calls results in a reservation? b. What assumption did you make in order to calculate the probability in Part (a)? c. What is the probability that at least one call results in a reservation being made?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.