/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 50 Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) are... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) are used to assess the fit of a line. a. Is it possible that both \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) could be large for a bivariate data set? Explain. (A picture might be helpful.) b. Is it possible that a bivariate data set could yield values of \(r^{2}\) and \(s_{e}\) that are both small? Explain. (Again, a picture might be helpful.) c. Explain why it is desirable to have \(r^{2}\) large and \(s_{e}\) small if the relationship between two variables \(x\) and \(y\) is to be described using a straight line.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, both \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) can be large when the data points are spread out from the line of best fit, but there is still a clear trend. Both \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) can be small when the data points do not follow any specific trend and are clustered around a mean point. A large \( r^2 \) and small \( s_e \) are desirable for a straight-line model as they indicate a good fit and high prediction accuracy respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \)

The coefficient of determination \( r^2 \) is a measure of how well the regression line represents the data. If the \( r^2 \) value is large, this means the line fits the data well. The standard error of the estimate \( s_e \) is a measure of the accuracy of predictions. If \( s_e \) is small, this indicates a high accuracy of prediction.
02

Analyze when both \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) could be large

Yes, it is possible that both \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) could be large for a bivariate data set. This could happen when the data points are spread out from the line of best fit, but there is still an apparent trend or direction that the data follows. This would yield a large deviation from the line (large \( s_e \)), but still a clear linear relationship (high \( r^2 \)).
03

Analyze when both \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) could be small

Yes, it is also possible that a bivariate data set could yield values of \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) that are both small. This situation could occur if the data points are closely clustered around a mean point but do not follow any specific linear or non-linear trend.
04

Explain why large \( r^2 \) and small \( s_e \) is desirable

When using a straight line to describe the relationship between \( x \) and \( y \), large \( r^2 \) and small \( s_e \) are desired because a large \( r^2 \) indicates that the line fits the data well and explains a large proportion of the variance in the data. On the other hand, a small \( s_e \) indicates high accuracy of prediction, which means the predicted values are close to the actual observed data points. Therefore, these conditions contribute to a well-fitting and accurate linear model.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, represented as \( r^2 \) in statistics, is a key indicator of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. Imagine plotting data points on a graph and observing how they align with the best-fitting straight line, known as the regression line.

The closer the data points are to this regression line, the higher the \( r^2 \) value, and the better the model explains the variation of the data. A perfect linear relationship, where all points lie directly on the line, would result in an \( r^2 \) value of 1. Conversely, an \( r^2 \) value close to 0 suggests little to no linear relationship between the variables.

Understanding \( r^2 \) is crucial as it provides clear insight into the effectiveness of the linear model. A high \( r^2 \) is desirable and indicates that the model accounts for a substantial portion of the variance within the data set.
Standard Error of the Estimate
Another important concept in regression analysis is the standard error of the estimate, denoted as \( s_e \). This statistic measures the average distance that the observed values fall from the regression line. Essentially, it quantifies the prediction error of the regression model.

A smaller \( s_e \) indicates that the data points are closer to the fitted regression line, implying more precise predictions. Higher values of \( s_e \) mean that actual points vary widely from the predictor line, suggesting a degree of uncertainty in prediction outcomes.

Aim for a low \( s_e \) when assessing the fit of a line to ensure that the model not only fits well but also predicts with high accuracy. The interplay between \( s_e \) and \( r^2 \) helps in understanding both the goodness of fit and the model's predictive power.
Fit of a Line
The fit of a regression line to a set of data points is visually examined by looking at how closely the data points cluster around the line. The \( r^2 \) value and \( s_e \) both provide numerical ways of assessing this fit.

When we have a high \( r^2 \) and a low \( s_e \), we can say that the line is an excellent representation of the data. On the other hand, if both \( r^2 \) and \( s_e \) are high, it suggests there is a trend or direction that the data follows, even though the data points are widely spread out. Conversely, low values for both indicate that the data points are aggregated together, albeit with no clear trend.

Perfecting the fit involves finding a line that captures the essence of the relationship between variables with high \( r^2 \) and low \( s_e \) values, thus providing both a good explanation of variance and high predictive precision.
Bivariate Data Analysis
Bivariate data analysis investigates the relationship between two different variables. Through the use of scatterplots, we can visually inspect patterns, trends, and correlations that may exist. Regression analysis is then employed to define these relationships more precisely and to create models for prediction.

In analyzing bivariate data, statisticians look at \( r^2 \) to gauge the explained variability and \( s_e \) to understand the standard deviation of observed points from the regression line. The goal in this analysis is to discern patterns in the data that reliably indicate how one variable affects the other.

With effective bivariate data analysis, we can make informed predictions, decisions, and inferences about the relationship between two variables, equipped with a full understanding of the underlying statistical metrics.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following data on \(x=\) score on a measure of test anxiety and \(y=\) exam score for a sample of \(n=9\) students are consistent with summary quantities given in the paper "Effects of Humor on Test Anxiety and Performance" (Psychological Reports [1999]: 1203-1212): $$ \begin{array}{llllllllll} x & 23 & 14 & 14 & 0 & 17 & 20 & 20 & 15 & 21 \\ y & 43 & 59 & 48 & 77 & 50 & 52 & 46 & 51 & 51 \end{array} $$ Higher values for \(x\) indicate higher levels of anxiety. a. Construct a scatterplot, and comment on the features of the plot. b. Does there appear to be a linear relationship between the two variables? How would you characterize the relationship? c. Compute the value of the correlation coefficient. Is the value of \(r\) consistent with your answer to Part (b)? d. Is it reasonable to conclude that test anxiety caused poor exam performance? Explain.

Data on pollution and cost of medical care for elderly people were given in Exercise \(5.17\) and are also shown here. The following data give a measure of pollution (micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter of air) and the cost of medical care per person over age 65 for six geographic regions of the United States: $$ \begin{array}{lcc} & & \begin{array}{l} \text { Cost of } \\ \text { Medical } \end{array} \\ \text { Region } & \text { Pollution } & \text { Care } \\ \hline \text { North } & 30.0 & 915 \\ \text { Upper South } & 31.8 & 891 \\ \text { Deep South } & 32.1 & 968 \\ \text { West South } & 26.8 & 972 \\ \text { Big Sky } & 30.4 & 952 \\ \text { West } & 40.0 & 899 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ The equation of the least-squares regression line for this data set is \(\hat{y}=1082.2-4.691 x\), where \(y=\) medical cost and \(x=\) pollution. a. Compute the six residuals. b. What is the value of the correlation coefficient for this data set? Does the value of \(r\) indicate that the linear relationship between pollution and medical cost is strong, moderate, or weak? Explain. c. Construct a residual plot. Are there any unusual features of the plot? d. The observation for the West, \((40.0,899)\), has an \(x\) value that is far removed from the other \(x\) values in the sample. Is this observation influential in determining the values of the slope and/or intercept of the least-squares line? Justify your answer.

The article "Air Pollution and Medical Care Use by Older Americans" (Health Affairs [2002]: 207-214) gave data on a measure of pollution (in micrograms of particulate matter per cubic meter of air) and the cost of medical care per person over age 65 for six geographical regions of the United States: $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Region } & \text { Pollution } & \text { Cost of Medical Care } \\ \hline \text { North } & 30.0 & 915 \\ \text { Upper South } & 31.8 & 891 \\ \text { Deep South } & 32.1 & 968 \\ \text { West South } & 26.8 & 972 \\ \text { Big Sky } & 30.4 & 952 \\ \text { West } & 40.0 & 899 \\ & & \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot of the data. Describe any interesting features of the scatterplot. b. Find the equation of the least-squares line describing the relationship between \(y=\) medical cost and \(x=\) pollution. c. Is the slope of the least-squares line positive or negative? Is this consistent with your description of the relationship in Part (a)? d. Do the scatterplot and the equation of the least-squares line support the researchers' conclusion that elderly people who live in more polluted areas have higher medical costs? Explain.

The accompanying data resulted from an experiment in which weld diameter \(x\) and shear strength \(y\) (in pounds) were determined for five different spot welds on steel. A scatterplot shows a pronounced linear pattern. With \(\Sigma(x-\bar{x})=1000\) and \(\Sigma(x-\bar{x})(y-\bar{y})=8577\), the least-squares line is \(\hat{y}=-936.22+8.577 x\). $$ \begin{array}{llllrr} x & 200.1 & 210.1 & 220.1 & 230.1 & 240.0 \\ y & 813.7 & 785.3 & 960.4 & 1118.0 & 1076.2 \end{array} $$ a. Because \(1 \mathrm{lb}=0.4536 \mathrm{~kg}\), strength observations can be re-expressed in kilograms through multiplication by this conversion factor: new \(y=0.4536(\) old \(y\) ). What is the equation of the least-squares line when \(y\) is expressed in kilograms? b. More generally, suppose that each \(y\) value in a data set consisting of \(n(x, y)\) pairs is multiplied by a conversion factor \(c\) (which changes the units of measurement for \(y\) ). What effect does this have on the slope \(b\) (i.e., how does the new value of \(b\) compare to the value before conversion), on the intercept \(a\), and on the equation of the least-squares line? Verify your conjectures by using the given formulas for \(b\) and \(a\). (Hint: Replace \(y\) with \(c y\), and see what happens - and remember, this conversion will affect \(\bar{y} .\) )

The article "Characterization of Highway Runoff in Austin, Texas, Area" (Journal of Environmental Engineering \([1998]: 131-137\) ) gave a scatterplot, along with the least-squares line for \(x=\) rainfall volume (in cubic meters) and \(y=\) runoff volume (in cubic meters), for a particular location. The following data were read from the plot in the paper: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrr} x & 5 & 12 & 14 & 17 & 23 & 30 & 40 & 47 \\ y & 4 & 10 & 13 & 15 & 15 & 25 & 27 & 46 \\ x & 55 & 67 & 72 & 81 & 96 & 112 & 127 & \\ y & 38 & 46 & 53 & 70 & 82 & 99 & 100 & \end{array} $$ a. Does a scatterplot of the data suggest a linear relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) ? b. Calculate the slope and intercept of the least-squares line. c. Compute an estimate of the average runoff volume when rainfall volume is 80 . d. Compute the residuals, and construct a residual plot. Are there any features of the plot that indicate that a line is not an appropriate description of the relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) ? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.