/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Sometimes samples are composed e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Sometimes samples are composed entirely of volunteer responders. Give a brief description of the dangers of using voluntary response samples.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Voluntary response sampling in statistics carries risks such as nonrepresentative samples due to self-selection of passionate participants leading to high bias. It also carries the hazard of nonresponse bias when the non-respondents differ significantly from those who volunteered.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Voluntary Response Sampling

Voluntary Response Sampling is a sampling method where participants are self-selected. These are individuals who themselves decide to participate in the survey, usually motivated by a strong interest or opinion towards the subject matter.
02

Dangers of Voluntary Response Sampling 1: Non-Representative Sample

Since participants self-select, there's a high risk that the sample won't be representative of the whole population. This is because the results will likely be biased towards the opinions and views of those who feel strongly enough to participate voluntarily.
03

Dangers of Voluntary Response Sampling 2: High Bias

Voluntary response samples are often biased because the sample population tends to contain mostly individuals who have strong opinions. Hence, those with moderate or opposing views may be underrepresented or not represented at all.
04

Dangers of Voluntary Response Sampling 3: Nonresponse Bias

If a sizable proportion of the sample does not respond, the sample can become a non-representative subset of the population. This results in Nonresponse bias and hence the results are not really applicable to the whole population. Also, this sampling method can introduce other related issues like self-selection bias.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Non-Representative Sample
When using voluntary response sampling, we often end up with a non-representative sample. This means that the group of respondents does not accurately reflect the larger population intended to be studied. In a voluntary response setup, the people who choose to respond usually have strong opinions or interests about the topic. Thus, they do not represent everyone in the overall population.

This sampling method often overlooks those who might have milder or no opinion, or simply do not feel strongly enough to respond. Therefore, the results will be skewed towards those with strong views. Consider a survey about a controversial topic: people with strong feelings for or against may flood the survey, while neutral individuals may not bother. This makes the sample biased, as the sample does not mirror the diversity of opinions in the whole community.
Bias in Sampling
Bias in sampling occurs when certain members of a population are more likely to be included in a sample than others, leading to outcomes that may not truly represent the wider population. Voluntary response sampling tends to have a high level of bias. People who opt to participate often have particular viewpoints; thus, they might not reflect the full spectrum of public opinion.

Some common biases linked to voluntary sampling include:
  • Selection Bias: Only those with a motivation to voice opinions will respond.
  • Self-Selection Bias: Individuals who do not respond may hold different views than those who do.

These biases could lead to skewed data where the results heavily reflect extreme opinions, potentially leading decision-makers astray with unbalanced insights.
Nonresponse Bias
Nonresponse bias occurs when a significant portion of selected participants chooses not to respond to a survey or study, which can dramatically skew the results. In voluntary response sampling, the risk of hitting nonresponse bias is quite high because those unwilling or without strong opinions often do not engage.

This type of bias can lead to underrepresentation of groups within the population. For example, a survey targeting community feedback on local park plans might only receive responses from those passionate about the park. Those who are neutral or indifferent may avoid the survey, leading to results that overemphasize the views of the park enthusiasts.

To combat nonresponse bias, it's important to employ methods that encourage wide participation across varied population segments, ensuring every segment has an equal opportunity to contribute their perspective. This inclusivity provides a fuller, fairer representation of the whole population's views.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As part of a curriculum review, the psychology department would like to select a simple random sample of 20 of last year's 140 graduates to obtain information on how graduates perceived the value of the curriculum. Describe two different methods that might be used to select the sample.

Does eating broccoli reduce the risk of prostate cancer? According to an observational study from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (see CNN.com web site article titled "Broccoli, Not Pizza Sauce, Cuts Cancer Risk, Study Finds," January 5,2000 ), men who ate more cruciferous vegetables (broccoli, cauliflower, brussels sprouts, and cabbage) had a lower risk of prostate cancer. This study made separate comparisons for men who ate different levels of vegetables. According to one of the investigators, "at any given level of total vegetable consumption, as the percent of cruciferous vegetables increased, the prostate cancer risk decreased." Based on this study, is it reasonable to conclude that eating cruciferous vegetables causes a reduction in prostate cancer risk? Explain.

The report "Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" (Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992) included the following description of the subjects used in an experiment: Twenty-four Cornell University students and staff (12 males and 12 females) volunteered to participate in the study. Three groups of 4 men and 4 women were selected by their stature to represent the 5 th percentile (female \(152.1 \pm 0.3 \mathrm{~cm}\), male \(164.1 \pm 0.4 \mathrm{~cm})\) 50th percentile (female \(162.4 \pm 0.1 \mathrm{~cm}\), male \(174.1 \pm\) \(0.7 \mathrm{~cm}\) ), and 95 th percentile (female \(171.9 \pm 0.2 \mathrm{~cm}\), male \(185.7 \pm 0.6 \mathrm{~cm}\) ranges \(\ldots\) All subjects reported using their right hand to operate a computer mouse. This experimental design incorporated direct control and blocking. a. Are the potential effects of the extraneous variable stature (height) addressed by blocking or direct control? b. Whether the right or left hand is used to operate the mouse was considered to be an extraneous variable. Are the potential effects of this variable addressed by blocking or direct control?

Researchers at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto compared babies born to mothers with diabetes to babies born to mothers without diabetes ("Conditioning and Hyperanalgesia in Newborns Exposed to Repeated Heel Lances," Journal of the American Medical Association \([2002]: 857-861\) ). Babies born to mothers with diabetes have their heels pricked numerous times during the first 36 hours of life in order to obtain blood samples to monitor blood sugar level. The researchers noted that the babies born to diabetic mothers were more likely to grimace or cry when having blood drawn than the babies born to mothers without diabetes. This led the researchers to conclude that babies who experience pain early in life become highly sensitive to pain. Comment on the appropriateness of this conclusion.

A pollster for the Public Policy Institute of California explains how the Institute selects a sample of California adults ("It's About Quality, Not Quantity," San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 21,2000 ): That is done by using computer-generated random residential telephone numbers with all California prefixes, and when there are no answers, calling back repeatedly to the original numbers selected to avoid a bias against hard-to- reach people. Once a call is completed, a second random selection is made by asking for the adult in the household who had the most recent birthday. It is as important to randomize who you speak to in the household as it is to randomize the household you select. If you didn't, you'd primarily get women and older people. Comment on this approach to selecting a sample. How does the sampling procedure attempt to minimize certain types of bias? Are there sources of bias that may still be a concern?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.