/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 The article "Effect of Temperatu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Effect of Temperature on the pH of Skim Milk" (Journal of Dairy Research [1988]: 277- 280) reported on a study involving \(x=\) temperature \(\left({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right)\) under specified experimental conditions and \(y=\) milk \(\mathrm{pH}\). The accompanying data (read from a graph) are a representative subset of that which appeared in the article: \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrr}x & 4 & 4 & 24 & 24 & 25 & 38 & 38 & 40 \\ y & 6.85 & 6.79 & 6.63 & 6.65 & 6.72 & 6.62 & 6.57 & 6.52\end{array}\) $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr} x & 45 & 50 & 55 & 56 & 60 & 67 & 70 & 78 \\ y & 6.50 & 6.48 & 6.42 & 6.41 & 6.38 & 6.34 & 6.32 & 6.34 \\ \sum x=678 & \sum y=104.54 & \sum x^{2}=36,056 & \\ \sum y^{2}=683.4470 & & \sum x y=4376.36 & & \end{array} $$ Do these data strongly suggest that there is a negative linear relationship between temperature and \(\mathrm{pH}\) ? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer is dependent on the calculated Pearson correlation coefficient, if it implies a significant negative linear relationship between temperature and milk pH at a significance level of 0.01, else the evidence doesn't strongly suggest the presence of such a relationship.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Mean values for X and Y

The mean values are given by the formula: \[\overline{x}=\sum x/n \text{ and } \overline{y}=\sum y/n\] where \(\overline{x}\) and \(\overline{y}\) are the means of X and Y respectively and n is the number of observations for each variable. The sum of X, ∑X=678, and the sum of Y, ∑Y=104.54, are given. The number of observations can be counted, which amounts to 17. Using these values, calculate the mean values.
02

Calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient (r)

The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) can be calculated using this formula: \[ r = \frac{{n\left(\sum xy\right) - \left(\sum x\right)\left(\sum y\right)}}{{\sqrt{\left[n\sum x^2 - \left(\sum x\right)^2\right]\left[n\sum y^2 - \left(\sum y\right)^2\right]}}}\] where n is the number of observations, ∑xy is the sum of the product of X and Y, ∑x and ∑y are the sums of X and Y respectively, and ∑x² and ∑y² are the sums of squares of X and Y respectively. Substituting the values, ∑xy=4376.36, ∑x²=36056, ∑y²=683.4470 and the just calculated mean values from step 1, compute the Pearson coefficient.
03

Test the Hypothesis

The null (H0) and alternative (Ha) hypotheses are as follows: H0: r = 0 (No linear relationship) Ha: r ≠ 0 (there's a linear relationship). To test the null hypothesis against the alternative, using a significance level of 0.01 and 15 degrees of freedom (n-2), compare the calculated Pearson coefficient from step 2 to the critical t-value from the t-distribution table.
04

Conclusion

If the calculated Pearson coefficient is less than the negative critical value or more than the positive critical value, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant negative linear relationship. If it is not, fail to reject null hypothesis and conclude that the evidence is not strong enough to assert a linear relationship.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Pearson correlation coefficient
The Pearson correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that quantifies the degree to which two variables are linearly related. In essence, it helps us understand if changes in one variable tend to be associated with proportional changes in another. The values of the Pearson coefficient, often denoted as \(r\), range from -1 to 1.
  • A Pearson coefficient of 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship, meaning as one variable increases, the other variable increases proportionally.
  • A value of -1 signifies a perfect negative linear relationship, which means that as one variable increases, the other decreases proportionally.
  • When the Pearson coefficient is 0, it suggests no linear relationship between the variables.
In the context of the given study on temperature and milk pH, the Pearson coefficient helps us determine if there is a linear association between these two factors. Using the formula for \(r\), researchers substitute the sums of the variables and their products to compute this coefficient. If the computed \(r\) is significantly different from zero, it implies that temperature might have a tangible effect on milk pH. Calculating this value with accuracy is crucial for drawing meaningful conclusions about the relationship.
Hypothesis testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical process used to determine whether a given hypothesis about a data set is supported by the data. It usually involves comparing observed data with a specific hypothesis and using a significance level, which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. The given exercise centers on testing the hypothesis about the linear relationship between temperature and milk pH. Here are the two main hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis \((H_0)\): This claims that there is no linear relationship between temperature and milk pH, expressed as \(r = 0\).
  • Alternative Hypothesis \((H_a)\): This asserts that there is a linear relationship, which means \(r eq 0\).
With a level of significance set at 0.01, we check if the observed correlation could have been a result of random chance. If the calculated Pearson correlation coefficient leads us to reject the \(H_0\), then the evidence points to a legitimate linear connection between the two variables.
Linear relationship
A linear relationship is a statistical term used to describe a relationship between two variables that can be represented with a straight line when plotted on a graph. In a linear relationship, any change in the independent variable \(x\) results in a proportional change in the dependent variable \(y\). In the context of the experiment, a linear relationship between temperature and milk pH suggests that as the temperature increases, the pH of milk changes predictably in a specific direction. Based on the data set provided, you can deduce whether a positive or negative slope exists.
  • If the relationship is negative, as the temperature rises, the pH decreases, forming a downward-sloping line.
  • If it were a positive slope (hypothetically), both variables would increase together.
Linear relationships are fundamental in predicting outcomes and understanding dependencies between variables in statistics. Here, if a strong negative linear relationship is found, it indicates that managing temperature could help in controlling the acidity levels in milk.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that a single \(y\) observation is made at each of the \(x\) values \(5,10,15,20\), and 25 . a. If \(\sigma=4\), what is the standard deviation of the statistic \(b\) ? b. Now suppose that a second observation is made at every \(x\) value listed in Part (a) (for a total of 10 observations). Is the resulting value of \(\sigma_{b}\) half of what it was in Part (a)? c. How many observations at each \(x\) value in Part (a) are required to yield a \(\sigma_{b}\) value that is half the value calculated in Part (a)? Verify your conjecture.

An}\( experiment to study the relationship between \)x=\( time spent exercising (min) and \)y=\( amount of oxygen consumed during the exercise period resulted in the following summary statistics. $$ \begin{aligned} &n=20 \quad \sum x-50 \quad \sum y-16,705 \quad \sum x^{2}-150 \\ &\sum y^{2}=14,194,231 \quad \sum x y=44,194 \end{aligned} $$ a. Estimate the slope and \)y\( intercept of the population regression line. b. One sample observation on oxygen usage was 757 for a 2 -min exercise period. What amount of oxygen consumption would you predict for this exercise period, and what is the corresponding residual? c. Compute a \)99 \%$ confidence interval for the true average change in oxygen consumption associated with a 1 -min increase in exercise time.

Exercise \(13.8\) gave data on \(x=\) treadmill run time to exhaustion and \(y=20-\mathrm{km}\) ski time for a sample of 11 biathletes. Use the accompanying MINITAB output to answer the following questions. The regression equation is ski \(=-88.8-2.33\) tread \(\begin{array}{lrrrr}\text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { Stdev } & \text { t-ratio } & p \\\ \text { Constant } & 88.796 & 5.750 & 15.44 & 0.000 \\ \text { tread } & 2.3335 & 0.5911 & 3.95 & 0.003 \\ s=2.188 & \text { R-sq }=63.4 \% & \text { R-sq }(a d j)=59.3 \% & \end{array}\) Analysis of Variance \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { DF } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F } & \text { p } \\ \text { Regression } & 1 & 74.630 & 74.630 & 15.58 & 0.003 \\ \text { Error } & 9 & 43.097 & 4.789 & & \\ \text { Total } & 10 & 117.727 & & & \end{array}\) a. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether the simple linear regression model is useful. b. Estimate the average change in ski time associated with a 1 -minute increase in treadmill time, and do so in a way that conveys information about the precision of estimation. c. MINITAB reported that \(s_{a+b(10)}=.689\). Predict ski time for a single biathlete whose treadmill time is \(10 \mathrm{~min}\), and do so in a way that conveys information about the precision of prediction. d. MINITAB also reported that \(s_{a+b(11)}=1.029 .\) Why is this larger than \(s_{a+b(10) ?}\)

The article "Effects of Gamma Radiation on Juvenile and Mature Cuttings of Quaking Aspen" (Forest Science \([1967]: 240-245\) ) reported the following data on \(x=\) exposure to radiation \((\mathrm{kR} / 6\) hours) and \(y=\mathrm{dry}\) weight of roots (mg): 8 $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrr} x & 0 & 2 & 4 & 6 & 8 \\ y & 110 & 123 & 119 & 86 & 62 \end{array} $$ a. Construct a scatterplot for these data. Does the plot suggest that the simple linear regression model might be appropriate? b. The estimated regression line for these data is \(\hat{y}=\) \(127-6.65 x\) and the standardized residuals are as given. \(\begin{array}{rrrrrr} & 0 & 2 & 4 & 6 & 8 \\ \text { resid. } & -1.55 & 0.68 & 1.25 & -0.05 & -1.06\end{array}\) \(x\) St. re Construct a standardized residual plot. What does the plot suggest about the adequacy of the simple linear regression model?

The accompanying summary quantities for \(x=\) particulate pollution \(\left(\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) and \(y=\) luminance \(\left(.01 \mathrm{~cd} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right)\) were calculated from a representative sample of data that appeared in the article "Luminance and Polarization of the Sky Light at Seville (Spain) Measured in White Light" \((A t=\) mospheric Environment \([1988]: 595-599) .\) $$ a. Test to see whether there is a positive correlation between particulate pollution and luminance in the population from which the data were selected. b. What proportion of observed variation in luminance can be attributed to the approximate linear relationship between luminance and particulate pollution? \begin{aligned} &n=15 \quad \sum x=860 \quad \sum y=348 \\ &\sum x^{2}=56,700 \quad \sum y^{2}=8954 \quad \sum x y=22,265 \end{aligned} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.