/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Are workers less likely to quit ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Are workers less likely to quit their jobs when wages are high than when they are low? The paper "Investigating the Causal Relationship Between Quits and Wages: An Exercise in Comparative Dynamics" (Economic Inquiry [1986]: \(61-83\) ) gave data on \(x=\) average hourly wage and \(y=\) quit rate for a sample of industries. These data were used to produce the accompanying MINITAB output The regression equation is quit rate \(=4.86-0.347\) wage Predictor Constant wage \(\begin{array}{rrrr}\text { Coef } & \text { Stdev } & \text { t-ratio } & p \\ 4.8615 & 0.5201 & 9.35 & 0.000 \\ 0.34655 & 0.05866 & 5.91 & 0.000\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{lll}0.4862 & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}=72.9 \% & \mathrm{R}-\mathrm{sq}(\mathrm{ad}) & =70.8 \%\end{array}\) Analysis of Variance \(\begin{array}{lrrrrr}\text { Source } & \text { DF } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F } & \text { p } \\ \text { Regression } & 1 & 8.2507 & 8.2507 & 34.90 & 0.000 \\ \text { Error } & 13 & 3.0733 & 0.2364 & & \\ \text { Total } & 14 & 11.3240 & & & \end{array}\) a. Based on the given \(P\) -value, does there appear to be a useful linear relationship between average wage and quit rate? Explain your reasoning. b. Calculate an estimate of the average change in quit rate associated with a \(\$ 1\) increase in average hourly wage, and do so in a way that conveys information about the precision and reliability of the estimate.

Short Answer

Expert verified
`Yes, there appears to be a significant linear relationship between average wage and quit rate. A $1 increase in average wage is associated with approximately 0.35% decrease in the quit rate.`

Step by step solution

01

Interpret the Coefficients

The regression equation is given as quit rate \(= 4.86 - 0.347\) wage. The coefficient of wage, \(0.347\), indicates the average change in the quit rate for each one-unit increase in wage. As the coefficient is negative, it suggests that an increase in wage is associated with a decrease in the quit rate.
02

Evaluate the significance of the coefficients

To evaluate the significance of the coefficient, we look at the t-ratio and p-value. The p-value for the constant term and wage are both \(0.000\), significantly less than the common significance level of \(0.05\). This indicates that both the constant term and the wage coefficient are statistically significant, strongly suggesting a useful linear relationship between average wage and quit rate.
03

Calculate the effect of an increase in wage

As the coefficient of the wage is \(-0.347\), this can be expected to indicate the average change in quit rate with a $1 increase in wage. Thus, a $1 increase in the average hourly wage would be associated with a \(-0.347\)% decrease in the quit rate.
04

Analyzing the precision and reliability of the estimate

Precision of the estimated change can be determined by the standard error given as \(0.05866\). A smaller standard error indicates that the estimate of the average change is more reliable. Consideration of the confidence interval around the estimate could also offer more insights about the reliability of the estimate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Significance
When conducting a linear regression analysis, one of the first things you’ll want to know is whether the relationship you are observing in the data is due to a real effect or just random noise. This is where statistical significance comes into play. Statistical significance helps to determine whether the relationship between two variables is real or if it could have happened by chance.

In our case, the statistical significance of the relationship between wages and quit rates can be assessed by looking at the p-value associated with the regression coefficients. The p-value indicates the probability of observing our results, or more extreme, if there was actually no relationship between the variables. A common threshold for declaring statistical significance is a p-value less than 0.05.

The MINITAB output provided shows that the p-values for the constant and the wage coefficient in our wage-quit rate regression are both 0.000. Since these are significantly less than 0.05, we can say with high confidence that our results are not due to random chance. Therefore, there is a statistically significant negative relationship between average hourly wages and quit rates in this sample of industries.
Regression Coefficient Interpretation
A regression coefficient quantifies the direction and magnitude of the relationship between an independent variable and the dependent variable in a regression model. In a simple linear regression, this coefficient represents the average change in the dependent variable for each one-unit change in the independent variable.

Specifically, in the context of our exercise, the coefficient for average hourly wage is -0.347. This tells us that for each dollar increase in average hourly wage, the quit rate is expected to decrease by 0.347 units. It's important to note that this is an average effect across all observations in the sample.

When interpreting this coefficient, we should also consider the standard error, which is 0.05866 in our MINITAB output. The smaller the standard error, the more precise is our estimate of the regression coefficient. In this case, since the p-value is very low and the standard error is relatively small, we can be confident in the robustness of our estimated relationship between wages and quit rates.
Relationship Between Wages and Quit Rates
Understanding the relationship between wages and quit rates can offer valuable insights for employers and policymakers. Generally, one might hypothesize that higher wages could lead to lower quit rates since employees have more incentive to stay in their jobs when they are paid more.

The regression analysis in the exercise supports this hypothesis with a negative coefficient for the wage variable, which indicates a negative relationship; as wages go up, quit rates tend to go down. This relationship is shown to be statistically significant, meaning it is highly unlikely that this pattern in the data is due to chance. However, it is essential to remember that correlation does not imply causation, and other factors not included in the model might also influence quit rates.

To provide a more precise interpretation, for every $1 increase in average hourly wage, the quit rate decreases, on average, by about 0.347 percent. Employers could use this information to consider wage adjustments as a strategy to reduce turnover and retain employees. However, this should be balanced against the overall cost implications and other motivational factors that can impact employee retention.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Technology, Productivity, and Industry Structure" (Technological Forecasting and Social Change [1983]: 1-13) included the accompanying data on \(x=\) research and development expenditure and \(y=\) growth rate for eight different industries. $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrrrrr} x & 2024 & 5038 & 905 & 3572 & 1157 & 327 & 378 & 191 \\ y & 1.90 & 3.96 & 2.44 & 0.88 & 0.37 & -0.90 & 0.49 & 1.01 \end{array} $$ a. Would a simple linear regression model provide useful information for predicting growth rate from research and development expenditure? Use a \(.05\) level of significance. b. Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the average change in growth rate associated with a 1 -unit increase in expenditure. Interpret the resulting interval.

A random sample of \(n=347\) students was selected, and each one was asked to complete several questionnaires, from which a Coping Humor Scale value \(x\) and a Depression Scale value \(y\) were determined ("Depression and Sense of Humor" (Psychological Reports [1994]: \(1473-1474\) ). The resulting value of the sample correlation coefficient was \(-.18\). a. The investigators reported that \(P\) -value \(<.05 .\) Do you agree? b. Is the sign of \(r\) consistent with your intuition? Explain. (Higher scale values correspond to more developed sense of humor and greater extent of depression.) c. Would the simple linear regression model give accurate predictions? Why or why not?

If the sample correlation coefficient is equal to 1, is it necessarily true that \(\rho=1 ?\) If \(\rho=1\), is it necessarily true that \(r=1 ?\)

A sample of \(n=61\) penguin burrows was selected, and values of both \(y=\) trail length \((\mathrm{m})\) and \(x=\) soil hardness (force required to penetrate the substrate to a depth of \(12 \mathrm{~cm}\) with a certain gauge, in \(\mathrm{kg}\) ) were determined for each one ("Effects of Substrate on the Distribution of Magellanic Penguin Burrows," The Auk [1991]: 923-933). The equation of the least-squares line was \(\hat{y}=11.607-\) \(1.4187 x\), and \(r^{2}=.386\). a. Does the relationship between soil hardness and trail length appear to be linear, with shorter trails associated with harder soil (as the article asserted)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses. b. Using \(s_{e}=2.35, \bar{x}=4.5\), and \(\sum(x-\bar{x})^{2}=250\), predict trail length when soil hardness is \(6.0\) in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the prediction. c. Would you use the simple linear regression model to predict trail length when hardness is \(10.0\) ? Explain your

The shelf life of packaged food depends on many factors. Dry cereal is considered to be a moisture-sensitive product (no one likes soggy cereal!) with the shelf life determined primarily by moisture content. In a study of the shelf life of one particular brand of cereal, \(x=\) time on shelf (stored at \(73^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) and \(50 \%\) relative humidity) and \(y=\) moisture content were recorded. The resulting data are from "Computer Simulation Speeds Shelf Life Assessments" (Package Engineering [1983]: 72-73). \(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrr}x & 0 & 3 & 6 & 8 & 10 & 13 & 16 \\ y & 2.8 & 3.0 & 3.1 & 3.2 & 3.4 & 3.4 & 3.5 \\ x & 20 & 24 & 27 & 30 & 34 & 37 & 41 \\ y & 3.1 & 3.8 & 4.0 & 4.1 & 4.3 & 4.4 & 4.9\end{array}\) a. Summary quantities are $$ \begin{array}{ll} \sum x=269 & \sum y=51 \quad \sum x y=1081.5 \\ \sum y^{2}=7745 & \sum x^{2}=190.78 \end{array} $$ Find the equation of the estimated regression line for predicting moisture content from time on the shelf. b. Does the simple linear regression model provide useful information for predicting moisture content from knowledge of shelf time? c. Find a \(95 \%\) interval for the moisture content of an individual box of cereal that has been on the shelf 30 days. d. According to the article, taste tests indicate that this brand of cereal is unacceptably soggy when the moisture content exceeds 4.1. Based on your interval in Part (c), do you think that a box of cereal that has been on the shelf 30 days will be acceptable? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.