/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 The paper "Effects of Fast-Food ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The paper "Effects of Fast-Food Consumption on Energy Intake and Diet Quality Among Children in a National Household Survey" (Pediatrics [2004]: \(112-118\) ) investigated the effect of fast-food consumption on other dietary variables. For a sample of 663 teens who reported that they did not eat fast food during a typical day, the mean daily calorie intake was 2258 and the sample standard deviation was \(1519 .\) For a sample of 413 teens who reported that they did eat fast food on a typical day, the mean calorie intake was 2637 and the standard deviation was 1138 . a. What assumptions about the two samples must be reasonable in order for the use of the two-sample \(t\) confidence interval to be appropriate? b. Use the given information to estimate the difference in mean daily calorie intake for teens who do eat fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The assumptions necessary to appropriately use the two-sample t confidence interval are the independence of the populations, normal distribution of both populations, and the same variance among both populations. The difference in mean daily calorie intake between teens who eat fast food and those who do not is 379.

Step by step solution

01

State Necessary Assumptions

The assumptions for using a two-sample t confidence interval should be: \n1. The two populations are independent.\n2. Both populations are normally distributed.\n3. Both populations have the same variance. While this assumption can be relaxed if the sample sizes are large enough, it's safe to assume for this demonstration.
02

Calculate Sample Size, Mean, and Standard Deviation for Both Groups

For the group of teens who do not consume fast food:\nSample size (n1) = 663\nSample mean (x̄1) = 2258 \nSample standard deviation (s1) = 1519 \n\nFor the group of teens who do consume fast food:\nSample size (n2) = 413 \nSample mean (x̄2) = 2637\nSample standard deviation (s2) = 1138
03

Compute the Difference in Means

The difference in mean daily calorie intake is computed by subtracting the mean intake of non-fast-food consumers from fast-food consumers.\n\n Difference in means = \(x̄2 - x̄1 = 2637 - 2258 = 379\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Independent Populations
Understanding the concept of independent populations is fundamental when analyzing data using statistical inference methods such as the two-sample t confidence interval. In the context of our exercise, we consider two groups of teens – those who consume fast food on a typical day and those who do not.

Independent populations imply that the two groups do not influence each other, and the observations in one group do not provide any information about the observations in the other group. In practical terms, none of the teens in the fast-food consuming group should be in the non-consuming group and vice versa. This distinction is critical because if the populations were not independent, the assessment of the difference in their calorie intakes would be biased or misinterpreted.

For our statistical approach to be valid, researchers must ensure that the method of selecting individuals into each group does not create any dependence between the two. For instance, the choice of one teenager to be in either group should not affect another's chance of being in the same or the other group.
Normal Distribution Assumption
When it comes to the assumption of normal distribution, it's all about the expected shape of the data's distribution. The two-sample t test hinges on the principle that the populations from where the samples are drawn should be normally distributed. This means the data should spread in a bell-shaped curve, with most values clustering around the mean and fewer as we move away from it.

The underlying reason this assumption is essential is due to the t distribution's properties that the test relies on. If the population is normally distributed, we can more confidently apply the t test to infer about the population's parameters based on our sample statistics.

However, the good news for the scenario in the exercise is that the t test is robust to violations of the normality assumption, especially when dealing with large sample sizes, like the 663 and 413 teens in our groups. As sample size increases, the Central Limit Theorem kicks in, suggesting that the sampling distribution of the mean tends to be normal, regardless of the shape of the population distribution.
Variance Assumption
Another critical assumption for the two-sample t test is the variance assumption. It posits that the variances of the two populations are equal, a condition known as homoscedasticity. This assumption impacts the way we estimate the standard error of the difference between the two means.

If the variances are indeed equal, we can pool them to get an accurate estimate of the standard error. In the context of our exercise, we initially presume that the population variances are the same for simplicity. However, in practice, we can test for equal variances with statistical tests like Levene's test or use a modified version of the two-sample t test that adjusts for unequal variances when necessary.

Moreover, when large samples are used, the two-sample t test can tolerate departures from the variance assumption – an aspect known as the test's robustness. So, even if the variances are not perfectly equal, as long as the sample sizes are large, our confidence interval calculations will still hold weight.
Statistical Inference
Statistical inference is a cornerstone of data analysis, allowing us to draw conclusions about a population, based on a sample of data. It encompasses various techniques, including the estimation of population parameters and hypothesis testing.

In the exercise, we use a two-sample t confidence interval to infer about the difference in mean calorie intake between two groups of teens. A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we can expect the true population parameter to lie, with a certain level of confidence (usually 95%). This interval gives us not just an estimate, but also an indication of the precision of that estimate and the uncertainty associated with it.

The purpose of statistical inference, in this case, is to utilize sample data to make educated guesses about the population means and to understand the reliability of these guesses. By employing the two-sample t test, we acknowledge that we can never be certain about the population characteristics, but we can assert, with a predetermined level of confidence, that the true difference in means likely falls within a specific interval.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a study of malpractice claims where a settlement had been reached, two random samples were selected: random sample of 515 closed malpractice claims that were found not to involve medical errors and a random sample 0 889 claims that were found to involve errors (New England Journal of Medicine [2006]: 2024-2033). The following statement appeared in the referenced paper: "When claims not involving errors were compensated, payments were sig. nificantly lower on average than were payments for claims involving errors \((\$ 313,205\) vs. \(\$ 521,560, P=0.004)\)." a. What hypotheses must the researchers have tested in order to reach the stated conclusion? b.__________

Are very young infants more likely to imitate actions that are modeled by a person or simulated by an object? This question was the basis of a research study summarized in the article "The Role of Person and Object in Eliciting Early Imitation" (Journal of Experimental Child Psychology [1991]: 423-433). One action examined was mouth opening. This action was modeled repeatedly by either a person or a doll, and the number of times that the infant imitated the behavior was recorded. Twentyseven infants participated, with 12 exposed to a human model and 15 exposed to the doll. Summary values are given here. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean number of imitations is higher for infants who watch a human model than for infants who watch a doll? Test the relevant hypotheses using a .01 significance level.

The effect of loneliness among college students was examined in the article "The Importance of Perceived Duration: Loneliness and Its Relationship to Self-Esteem and Academic Performance" (Journal College Student Development \([1994]: 456-460\) ). Based on reported frequency and duration of loneliness, subjects were divided into two groups. The first group was the short-duration loneliness group, and the second was the long-duration loneliness group. A self-esteem inventory was administered to students in both groups. For the short-duration group, the reported mean self-esteem score was \(76.78\) and the standard deviation was \(17.80\). For the long-duration group, the mean and standard deviation were \(64.00\) and \(15.68\), respectively. Do the data support the researcher's claim that mean self-esteem is lower for students classified as having long-duration loneliness? Test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha=.01\). Be sure to state any assumptions that are necessary for your test to be valid.

The article "Trial Lawyers and Testosterone: BlueCollar Talent in a White- Collar World" (Joumal of Applied Social Psychology \([1998]: 84-94\) ) compared trial lawyers and nontrial lawyers on the basis of mean testosterone level. Random samples of 35 male trial lawyers, 31 male nontrial lawyers, 13 female trial lawyers, and 18 female nontrial lawyers were selected for study. The article includes the following statement: "Trial lawyers had higher testosterone levels than did nontrial lawyers. This was true for men, \(t(64)=3.75, p<.001\), and for women, \(t(29)=2.26, p<.05 . "\) a. Based on the information given, is there a significant difference in the mean testosterone level for male trial and nontrial lawyers? b. Based on the information given, is there a significant difference in the mean testosterone level for female trial and nontrial lawyers? c. Do you have enough information to carry out a test to determine whether there is a significant difference in the mean testosterone levels of male and female trial lawyers? If so, carry out such a test. If not, what additional information would you need to be able to conduct the test?

The authors of the paper "Inadequate Physician Knowledge of the Effects of Diet on Blood Lipids and Lipoproteins" (Nutrition Journal \([2003]: 19-26)\) summarize the responses to a questionnaire on basic knowledge of nutrition that was mailed to 6000 physicians selected at random from a list of physicians licensed in the United States. Sixteen percent of those who received the questionnaire completed and returned it. The authors report that 26 of 120 cardiologists and 222 of 419 internists did not know that carbohydrate was the diet component most likely to raise triglycerides.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.