/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 Last year you looked at all the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Last year you looked at all the financial firms that had stock growth funds. You picked the growth fund that had the best performance last year (ranking at the 99 th percentile on performance) and invested all your money in it this year. This year, with its new investments, it ranked only at the 65 th percentile on performance. Your friend suggests that its stock picker became complacent or was burned out. Can you give another explanation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The fund's lower rank might be due to regression to the mean rather than stock picker complacency.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Percentiles

Percentiles indicate relative standings; a 99th percentile rank means a fund did better than 99% of funds, whereas a 65th percentile rank means it did better than 65% of funds.
02

Considering Regression to the Mean

Regression to the mean is a statistical phenomenon where if a variable is extreme on its first measurement, it will likely be closer to the average on a second measurement. This suggests that the fund's drop from the 99th to the 65th percentile might be due to this natural tendency.
03

Evaluating Market Conditions

A change in market conditions could also have affected the performance of all funds differentially, impacting the fund's relative performance independent of the stock picker's skill.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Percentiles
Percentiles are a helpful way in statistics to understand how a particular measurement compares to a group. A 99th percentile, for example, signifies that the particular fund outperformed 99% of other funds.

In simpler terms, it means that if there were 100 funds being compared, only one, or none, performed better than the one in question. Being in such a high percentile is generally a notable achievement, often indicating exceptional performance. Conversely, a 65th percentile indicates better performance than 65% of the funds, suggesting a drop or change in relative standing.

Understanding percentiles helps investors evaluate how well their investments are doing in comparison to others. It doesn't just show performance but gives a relative standing among a group.
Regression to the Mean
Regression to the mean is a statistical concept that refers to the tendency of extreme values to fall closer to the average upon subsequent measurements.

In simpler terms, if you have an exceptional year with a fund ranking in the 99th percentile, it's natural, statistically speaking, for its performance to appear less spectacular in future evaluations. This is not necessarily because something got worse, but because such high performance is often unsustainable over the long term.

Imagine flipping a coin and getting heads 10 times in a row. The chance of getting such a result is low, so future flips are more likely to show a more balanced outcome, reflecting the true odds. Similarly, financial funds that achieve very high performance one year might not maintain the same spot due to this natural phenomenon.
Evaluating Market Conditions
Market conditions encompass all external factors that can influence the performance of investments. This includes economic indicators such as interest rates, inflation, and geopolitical events.

A sudden change in any of these conditions can dramatically affect how financial products, like stock growth funds, perform. For instance, if an economic downturn occurs, it can lead to poorer overall performance for most investments,
even ones that were previously outperforming.

Therefore, a fund's fall from the 99th to the 65th percentile is not solely due to the actions of a stock picker but can also be a result of such broader market conditions. This is why it is crucial to keep an eye on not just the fund itself but also the larger economic landscape to understand performance shifts accurately.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If a slope is 1.63 when \(x=\) investment in thousands of euros, then what is the slope when \(x=\) investment in euros?

The following data show the number of components (per square inch, in millions) being packed on a Pentium-type chip, for years 1994 to \(2015 .\) Let \(x\) be the number of years since 1994 (e.g., \(x=0\) for \(1994, x=3\) for \(1997, \ldots, x=21\) for 2015\()\) and let \(y\) be the number of components on a chip. The prediction equation when fitting an exponential regression model to these data equals \(\hat{y}=151.61 \times 1.191^{x}\) a. What is the predicted number of components per square inch in \(2015 ?\) b. By how much does the predicted number of components increase per year over the time range that these data cover? c. The correlation between the logarithm of the count and \(x\) equals \(0.985,\) and the scatterplot with the log counts shows a linear trend. What does this suggest about whether the exponential regression model is appropriate for these data?

A regression analysis is conducted with 32 observations. a. What is the \(d f\) value for inference about the slope \(\beta\) ? b. Which two \(t\) test statistic values would give a \(P\) -value of 0.10 for testing \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: \boldsymbol{\beta}=0\) against \(\mathrm{H}_{a}: \beta \neq 0 ?\) c. What is the value of the \(t\) -score that you multiply the standard error with to find the margin of error for a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta\) ?

Study time and college GPA Exercise 3.39 in Chapter 3 showed data collected at the end of an introductory statistics course to investigate the relationship between \(x=\) study time per week (average number of hours) and \(y=\) college GPA. The table here shows the data for the eight males in the class on these variables and on the number of class lectures for the course that the student reported skipping during the term. $$ \begin{array}{cccc} \hline \text { Student } & \text { Study Time } & \text { GPA } & \text { Skipped } \\ \hline 1 & 14 & 2.8 & 9 \\ 2 & 25 & 3.6 & 0 \\ 3 & 15 & 3.4 & 2 \\ 4 & 5 & 3.0 & 5 \\ 5 & 10 & 3.1 & 3 \\ 6 & 12 & 3.3 & 2 \\ 7 & 5 & 2.7 & 12 \\ 8 & 21 & 3.8 & 1 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Create a data file and use it to construct a scatterplot between \(x\) and \(y\). Interpret. b. Find the prediction equation and interpret the slope. c. Find the predicted GPA for a student who studies 25 hours per week. d. Find and interpret the residual for Student \(2,\) who reported \(x=25\)

For which student body do you think the correlation between high school GPA and college GPA would be higher: Yale University or the University of Connecticut? Explain why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.