/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 62 Education and religious beliefs ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Education and religious beliefs When data from a recent GSS were used to form a \(3 \times 3\) table that cross-tabulates highest degree (1 = less than high school, \(2=\) high school or junior college, \(3=\) bachelor or graduate) with religious beliefs \((\mathrm{F}=\) fundamentalist, \(\mathbf{M}-\) moderate, \(\mathbf{L}\) - liberal), the three largest stan dardized residuals were: 6.8 for the cell \((3, \mathrm{~F}), 6.3\) for the cell \((3, \mathbf{L}),\) and 4.5 for the cell \((1, F)\). Summarize how to interpret these three standardized residuals.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The high residuals for (3, F) and (3, L) suggest strong discrepancies in educational levels and religious beliefs, while (1, F) shows a notable, but less pronounced, deviation.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Standardized Residuals

Standardized residuals are used to measure the difference between observed and expected frequencies in a contingency table. A high absolute value indicates a higher than expected discrepancy between the observed and expected counts. In this problem, the standardized residuals measure how the observed counts for the specific combinations of education level and religious beliefs deviate from what would be expected if there were no association between these two variables.
02

Interpretation of Residual (3, F)

The standardized residual of 6.8 for the cell (3, F) indicates a large deviation, suggesting that the count of individuals with a bachelor or graduate degree and identifying as fundamentalist is significantly lower or higher than expected. The high positive or negative value shows a strong deviation.
03

Interpretation of Residual (3, L)

The standardized residual of 6.3 for the cell (3, L) implies a similarly large deviation from expectations, meaning the observed count of individuals with a bachelor or graduate degree and liberal religious beliefs substantially differs from the expected count under independence.
04

Interpretation of Residual (1, F)

The standardized residual of 4.5 for the cell (1, F) indicates the presence of more or fewer individuals with less than high school education identifying as fundamentalists than anticipated. Although smaller than the other two, it still suggests a meaningful deviation from independence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Standardized Residuals
Standardized residuals are a valuable tool in statistics, especially when examining contingency tables. They measure how much the observed data deviates from expected values. Contingency tables help illustrate the relationship between two categorical variables, like education levels and religious beliefs. When the standardized residual is large, either positively or negatively, it indicates a significant difference between what we observe and what we'd expect if there were no relationship between the variables in question.

In our exercise, three standardized residuals were highlighted. A residual of 6.8 for those with higher education identifying as fundamentalists suggests a notable deviation from the norm. Similarly, a residual of 6.3 for liberal individuals with the same education level shows another significant divergence. Lastly, a residual of 4.5 for less educated fundamentalists, though smaller, still points to an unusual pattern. Understanding these residuals can guide researchers in identifying trends, patterns, or associations in data that warrant further investigation.
Cross-tabulation
Cross-tabulation is a technique used to analyze the relationship between two or more categorical variables. It provides a summary, often in the form of a table, that displays the distribution of these variables to uncover patterns or relationships of interest.

In the context of religious beliefs and education, cross-tabulation can help us understand how different education levels correlate with types of religious beliefs. By organizing the data into categories, such as education level and religious affiliation, we can observe how these categories interact with one another.

For instance, the exercise's cross-tabulated data unveiled interesting findings. It showed uncommonly high or low numbers of individuals in various religious and education categories than expected. Such tables are fundamental in sociological research, enabling us to grasp how societal factors interplay in forming belief systems or education achievements.
Religious Beliefs and Education
The relationship between religious beliefs and education is complex and multi-faceted. Different educational backgrounds can influence how individuals align with certain religious beliefs, and vice versa.

In terms of the data observed in the exercise, having a bachelor's or graduate degree seemed to correlate interestingly with specific religious denominations, whether liberal or fundamentalist. The standardized residuals reflected that this group showed variations from expected counts if the two variables were independent. This could suggest that higher education may influence one’s likelihood to adopt specific religious beliefs or to question and reevaluate their beliefs.

Analyzing how educational achievement links to religious belief can provide insights into broader social dynamics, such as values, decision-making patterns, and community influence. This analysis can help identify if education has some predictive power in the religious domain.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Serious side effects In \(2007,\) the FDA announced that the popular drug Zelnorm used to treat irritable bowel syndrome was withdrawn from the market, citing concerns about serious side effects. The analysis of several studies revealed that 13 of 11,614 patients receiving the drug had a serious side effect such as heart attack or stroke, compared to just 1 out of 7,031 on placebo. a. Construct a \(2 \times 2\) contingency table from these data. b. Compute the relative risk and interpret. c. Compute the odds ratio and interpret. d. In a letter to health care professionals, the drug maker quoted a P-value of 0.024 for the comparison between the probability of a serious side effect in the drug and placebo group. By entering the data into the Fisher's Exact Test web app (or other software), show that this is the P-value for Fisher's exact test with a two-sided alternative hypothesis. What are the conclusions at a 0.05 significance level?

Williams College admission Data from 2013 posted on the Williams College website shows that of all 3,195 males applying, \(18.2 \%\) were admitted, and of all 3,658 females applying, \(16.9 \%\) were admitted. Let \(\mathrm{X}\) denote gender of applicant and \(\mathrm{Y}\) denote whether admitted. a. Which conditional distributions do these percentages refer to, those of \(Y\) at given categories of \(X,\) or those of \(X\) at given categories of \(Y ?\) Set up a table showing the two conditional distributions. b. Are \(X\) and \(Y\) independent or dependent? Explain.

What is \(d f\) ? The contingency table that follows has \(d f=4\). Show that you can reconstruct the entire table by filling in the remaining cell counts based on the 4 cell counts shown. \begin{tabular}{lllllll} \hline & \(\mathrm{A}\) & \(\mathrm{B}\) & \(\mathrm{C}\) & \(\mathrm{D}\) & \(\mathrm{E}\) & Total \\ & 24 & 21 & 12 & 10 & \(-\) & 100 \\ & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & \(-\) & 100 \\ Total & 40 & 40 & 40 & 40 & 40 & 200 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Smelling and mortality A recent study (Pinto et al., Olfactory Dysfunction Predicts 5-Year Mortality in Older Adults. PLoS ONE \(9(10): \mathrm{e} 107541,2014)\) mentions that anosmic (those with almost no sense of smell) older adults had more than three times the odds of death over a 5-year span compared to normosmic (those with normal smell) individuals. Does this imply that anosmic older adults were more than three times as likely to die over the next 5 years than normosmic ones? Explain.

In the GSS, subjects who were married were asked about the happiness of their marriage, the variable coded as HAPMAR. a. Go to the GSS website sda.berkeley.edu/GSS/, click GSS with no weight as the default, and construct a contingency table for 2012 relating family income (measured as in Table 11.1 ) to marital happiness: Enter FINRELA(r:4;3;2) as the row variable (where \(4=\) "above average," \(3=\) "average, \("\) and \(2=\) "below average") and HAPMAR(r:3;2;1) as the column variable \((3=\) not \(t o 0,2=\) pretty \(,\) and \(1=\) very happy \()\) As the selection filter, enter YEAR(2012). Under Output Options, put a check in the row box (instead of in the column box) for the Percentaging option and put a check in the Summary Statistics box further below. Click on Run the Table. b. Construct a table or graph that shows the conditional distributions of marital happiness, given family income. How would you describe the association? c. Compare the conditional distributions to those in Table \(11.2 .\) For a given family income, what tends to be higher, general happiness or marital happiness for those who are married? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.