/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 107 The crude death rate is the numb... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 10: Problem 107

The crude death rate is the number of deaths in a year, per size of the population, multiplied by 1000 . a. According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, in 1995 Mexico had a crude death rate of 4.6 (i.e., 4.6 deaths per 1000 population) while the United States had a crude death rate of \(8.4 .\) Explain how this overall death rate could be higher in the United States even if the United States had a lower death rate than Mexico for people of each specific age. b. For each age level, the death rate is higher in South Carolina than in Maine. Overall, the death rate is higher in Maine (H. Wainer, Chance, vol. \(12,1999,\) p. 44). Explain how this could be possible.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Crude death rates can be higher in populations with a larger portion of older individuals despite lower age-specific death rates.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Crude Death Rate Formula

The crude death rate is calculated as the number of deaths in a year divided by the size of the population, multiplied by 1000. It is represented as:\[\text{Crude Death Rate} = \left( \frac{\text{Number of Deaths}}{\text{Total Population}} \right) \times 1000\]
02

Explaining US vs Mexico Crude Death Rate

To explain why the U.S. has a higher crude death rate than Mexico despite having lower age-specific death rates, consider the age distribution: the U.S. might have a larger proportion of older people, who naturally have higher death rates than younger people. Therefore, the overall crude death rate can be inflated due to a higher percentage of the population being in older age categories.
03

Explaining South Carolina vs Maine Death Rate Discrepancy

Similar to the U.S. and Mexico scenario, if Maine's population has more older individuals, who have naturally higher death rates, it could lead to a higher overall crude death rate than South Carolina, even if South Carolina has higher age-specific death rates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Age Distribution
Age distribution is a critical component when interpreting the crude death rate of a population. Populations are not uniform; they contain people of different ages. This age structure can greatly affect the overall death rate observed in a country.

Imagine two countries, A and B. Country A has a larger portion of its population over the age of 65 compared to Country B. Since older individuals naturally tend to have higher mortality rates, Country A might report a higher crude death rate despite having better healthcare or lower death rates at every age level. The presence of a larger number of older people, who inherently face higher risks of dying, skews the crude death rate upward.

In contrast, if Country B has a younger age distribution, it might observe a lower crude death rate even if age-specific death rates were slightly worse than those of Country A. This shows how the age distribution, or the percentage of specific age groups within a population, is pivotal in understanding why a country might present a misleadingly higher or lower death rate.
Death Rate Discrepancy
Death rate discrepancy can occur when the overall death rate does not align with age-specific death rates. This can seem puzzling at first, but it's all about population composition.

Consider the puzzling scenario between South Carolina and Maine. Maine reports a higher overall death rate despite having lower age-specific death rates compared to South Carolina. How? The key is the age distribution.

Maine may have a larger proportion of elderly residents, people who have intrinsically higher death rates. Meanwhile, South Carolina might have a younger population. So, while South Carolina's age-specific death rates are higher (perhaps due to lifestyle factors or healthcare differences), the abundance of younger people reduces its overall death rate.

Thus, understanding demographic makeup is crucial when analyzing crude death rates; they can obscure the underlying realities of health across different age groups.
Age-specific Death Rates
Age-specific death rates are measured by examining the number of deaths within a specific age group per 1,000 people of that age. This gives a clear picture of mortality risks for specific age brackets.

These rates are vital for understanding health outcomes beyond the blunt instrument of the crude death rate. By looking at age-specific rates, we can discern the actual mortality risk faced by different age groups. For example, if a country's seniors have a significantly lower mortality risk than expected, yet the crude death rate is high, there might be factors like a naturally older population skewing overall statistics.

Moreover, using age-specific death rates helps in crafting health policies targeted at specific groups. If young adults have a higher death rate in a region, resources might be directed toward reducing risks particular to that demographic. Analyzing these rates independently of the overall population can uncover issues masked by general statistics and help tailor more effective interventions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Danish study of individuals born at a Copenhagen hospital between 1959 and 1961 reported higher mean IQ scores for adults who were breast-fed for longer lengths of time as babies (E. Mortensen et al., \(J A M A,\) vol. \(287,2002,\) pp. \(2365-2371\) ). The mean IQ score was \(98.1(s=15.9)\) for the \(272 \mathrm{sub}\) jects who had been breast-fed for no longer than a month and \(108.2(s=13.1)\) for the 104 subjects who had been breast-fed for seven to nine months. a. With software that can analyze summarized data, use an inferential method to analyze whether the corresponding population means differ, assuming the population standard deviations are equal. Interpret. b. Was this an experimental or an observational study? Can you think of a potential lurking variable?

A National Center for Health Statistics data brief published in 2015 (Nr. 181) looked at the association between lung obstruction and smoking status in adults 40 to 79 years old. In a random sample of 6927 adults without any lung obstruction, \(54.1 \%\) never smoked. In a random sample of 1146 adults with lung obstruction (such as asthma or COPD), \(23.8 \%\) never smoked. a. Find and interpret a point estimate of the difference between the proportion of adults without and with lung obstruction who never smoked. b. A \(99 \%\) confidence interval for the true difference is \((0.267,0.339) .\) Interpret. c. What assumptions must you make for the interval in part b to be valid?

A study of a sample of horseshoe crabs on a Florida island (J. Brockmann, Ethology, vol. \(102,1996,\) pp. \(1-21\) ) investigated the factors that were associated with whether female crabs had a male crab mate. Basic statistics, including the five-number summary on weight (kg) for the 111 female crabs who had a male crab nearby and for the 62 female crabs who did not have a male crab nearby, are given in the table. Assume that these horseshoe crabs have the properties of a random sample of all such crabs. $$\begin{array}{lcccccccc}\hline {\text { Summary Statistics for Weights of Horseshoe Crabs }} \\ \hline & n & \text { Mean } & \text { Std. Dev. } & \text { Min } & \text { Q1 } & \text { Med } & \text { Q3 } & \text { Max } \\\\\hline \text { Mate } & 111 & 2.6 & 0.6 & 1.5 & 2.2 & 2.6 & 3.0 & 5.2 \\ \text { No Mate } & 62 & 2.1 & 0.4 & 1.2 & 1.8 & 2.1 & 2.4 & 3.2 \\ \hline\end{array}$$ a. Sketch box plots for the weight distributions of the two groups. Interpret by comparing the groups with respect to shape, center, and variability. b. Estimate the difference between the mean weights of female crabs who have mates and female crabs who do not have mates. c. Find the standard error for the estimate in part b. d. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference between the population mean weights, and interpret.

To increase Barack Obama's visibility and to raise money for the campaign leading up to the 2008 presidential election, Obama's analytics team conducted an \(\mathrm{A} / \mathrm{B}\) test with his website. In the original version, the button to join the campaign read "Sign Up". In an alternative version, it read "Learn More". Of 77,858 visitors to the original version, 5851 clicked the button. Of 77,729 visitors to the alternative version, 6927 clicked the button. Is there evidence that one version was more successful than the other in recruiting campaign members? a. Sketch an appropriate graph to compare the sample proportions visually. b. Show all steps of a significance test, using the computer output. Define any parameters you are using when specifying the hypotheses. Mention whether there is a significant difference at the 0.05 significance level. c. Interpret the confidence interval shown in the output. Why is this interval more informative than just reporting the P-value?

In the study for cancer death rates, consider the null hypothesis that the population proportion of cancer deaths \(p_{1}\) for placebo is the same as the population proportion \(p_{2}\) for aspirin. The sample proportions were \(\hat{p}_{1}=347 / 11535=0.0301\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=327 / 14035=0.0233 .\) a. For testing \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) against \(\mathrm{H}_{a}: p_{1} \neq p_{2},\) show that the pooled estimate of the common value \(p\) under \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\) is \(\hat{p}=0.026\) and the standard error is 0.002 . b. Show that the test statistic is \(z=3.4\). c. Find and interpret the P-value in context.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.